Cited by 395Schizophrenia research and treatmentSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health and Psychiatry

Schizophrenia, neuroleptic medication and mortality

Open access
Joukamaa, Matti, Heliövaara, Markku, Knekt, Paul, Aromaa, Arpo, Raitasalo, Raimo, Lehtinen, Ville·2006·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an excess of death from natural causes among people with schizophrenia. AIMS: Schizophrenia and its treatment with neuroleptics were studied for their prediction of mortality in a representative population sample of 7217 Finns aged >/= 30 years. METHOD: A comprehensive health examination was carried out at baseline. Schizophrenia was determined using the Present State Examination and previous medical records. RESULTS: During a 17-year follow-up, 39 of the 99 people with schizophrenia died. Adjusted for age and gender, the relative mortality risk between those with schizophrenia and others was 2.84 (95% CI 2.06-3.90), and was 2.25 (95% CI1.61-3.15) after further adjusting for somatic diseases, bloodpressure, cholesterol, body mass index, smoking, exercise, alcohol intake and education. The number of neuroleptics used at the time of the baseline survey showed a graded relation to mortality. Adjusted for age, gender, somatic diseases and other potential risk factors for premature death, the relative risk was 2.50 (95% CI1.46-4.30) per increment of one neuroleptic. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need to ascertain whether the high mortality in schizophrenia is attributable to the disorder itself or the antipsychotic medication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.188.2.122

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joukamaa, M., Heliövaara, M., Knekt, P., Aromaa, A., Raitasalo, R., & Lehtinen, V.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • Social Insurance Institution (FI)
Corresponding author
Joukamaa, Matti
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-02
Volume
188
Issue
2
Pages
122-127
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2150154702
Cited by
395
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
FWCI
20.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, mortality, antipsychotic drugs, excess mortality, natural death, adverse drug reactions, Finnish population
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Cholesterol, HDL, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Smoking, Antipsychotic Agents, Exercise, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Polypharmacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review