Cited by 34Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychology and Mental Health

Insight in paranoia: The role of experiential avoidance and internalized stigma

Valiente, Carmen, Provencio, Maria, Espinosa, Regina, Duque, Almudena, Everts, Franziska·2015·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Evidence suggests that insight in psychosis has been related to treatment adherence, recovery and good prognosis, but also to depression, low self-esteem, and diminished quality of life. Thus, insight might not be advantageous under all circumstances. Internalized-stigma (i.e. self-acceptance of stigmatizing images of illness) and experiential avoidance (i.e. unwillingness to experience negative private events) have been proposed as moderating variables between insight, and psychological health variables and/or distress. We investigated the patterns of association of insight with satisfaction with life, self-esteem, depression, anxiety and psychotic psychopathology as moderated by self-stigmatizing beliefs and experiential avoidance, in a sample of 47 participants with persecutory beliefs and diagnosed with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder. Moderation analyses confirm the importance of internalized-stigma and experiential avoidance. The presence of insight was associated with more depression when there were high levels of self-stigma. Whereas, the absence of insight was associated with a greater life satisfaction when there were high levels of experiential avoidance. To summarize, our results help understand the complex relationship between insight, psychological health variables and emotional distress, pointing to a differential pattern of moderation for negative and positive outcomes. We discuss the implications of these results for research and treatment of paranoia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2015.03.010

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valiente, C., Provencio, M., Espinosa, R., Duque, A., & Everts, F.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Valiente, Carmen
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
164
Issue
1-3
Pages
214-220
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097032204
Cited by
34
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
I+D+I Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (PSI2009-13472, PSI2012-31494)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
insight, paranoia
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Paranoid Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review