Cited by 124Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Do paranoid delusions exist on a continuum with subclinical paranoia? A multi-method taxometric study.

Open access
Elahi, A., Perez Algorta, G., Varese, F., McIntyre, J.C., Bentall, R.P.·2017·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is widespread interest in whether psychosis exists on a continuum with healthy functioning. Previous research has implied that paranoia, a common symptom of psychosis, exists on a continuum but this has not been investigated using samples including both patients and non-patients and up-to-date taxometric methods. AIM: To assess the latent structure of paranoia in a diverse sample using taxometric methods. METHOD: We obtained data from 2836 participants, including the general population as well as at-risk mental state and psychotic patients using the P-scale of the Paranoia and Deservedness Scale. Data were analysed using three taxometric procedures, MAMBAC, MAXEIG and L-MODE (Ruscio, 2016), and two sets of paranoia indicators (subscales and selected items from the P scale), including and excluding the patient groups. RESULTS: Eleven of the twelve analyses supported a dimensional model. Using the full sample and subscales as indicators, the MAMBAC analysis was ambiguous. Overall, the findings converged on a dimensional latent structure. CONCLUSIONS: A dimensional latent structure of paranoia implies that the processes involved in sub-clinical paranoia may be similar to those in clinical paranoia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.022

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Ahmed, A.O., Green, B.A., Buckley, P.F., McFarland, M.E., 2012. Taxometric analyses of paranoid and schizoid personality disorders. Psychiatry Res. 196 (1), 123 -132.
  2. Ahmed, A.O., Green, B.A., Goodrum, N.M., Doane, N.J., Birgenheir, D., Buckley, P.F., 2013. Does a latent class underlie schizotypal personality disorder? Implications for schizophrenia. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 122 (2), 475.
  3. Bebbington, P.E., McBride, O., Steel, C., Kuipers, E., Radovanovi č , M., Brugha, T., Jenkins, R., Meltzer, H.I., Freeman, D., 2013. The structure of paranoia in the general population. Br. J. Psychiatry http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.119032. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bentall, R.P., 2003. Madness Explained: Psychosis and Human Nature. Penguin Group, London.
  5. Claridge, G., 1987. ' The schizophrenias as nervous types ' revisited. Br. J. Psychiatry 151 (6), 735 -743.
  6. Dunn, T.J., Baguley, T., Brunsden, V., 2014. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br. J. Psychol. 105 (3), 399 -412. Everett, K.V., Linscott, R.J., 2015. Dimensionality vs taxonicity of schizotypy: some new data and challenges ahead. Schizophr. Bull. 41 (Suppl. 2), S465 -S474.
  7. Lawrie, S.M., Hall, J., Owens, D.G.C., Johnstone, E.C., 2010. The ' continuum of psychosis ' : scienti fi cally unproven and clinically impractical. Br. J. Psychiatry 197, 423 -425. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0075)
  8. Lenzenweger, M.F., 2010. Schizotypy and Schizophrenia. Guilford, New York. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0080)
  9. Linscott, R.J., Marie, D., Arnott, K.L., Clarke, B.L., 2006. Over-representation of Maori New Zealanders among adolescents in a schizotypy taxon. Schizophr. Res. 84 (2), 289 -296. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0085)
  10. Linscott, R.J., Allardyce, J., van Os, J., 2010. Seeking verisimilitude in a class: a systematic review of evidence that the criterial clinical symptoms of schizophrenia are taxonic. Schizophr. Bull. 36 (4), 811 -829. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0090)
  11. Meehl, P.E., Yonce, L.J., 1994. Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychol. Rep. 74 (3), 1059 -1274. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0100)
  12. Morrison, A.P., Shryane, N., Beck, R., Heffernan, S., Law, H., McCusker, M., Bentall, R.P., 2013. Psychosocial and neuropsychiatric predictors of subjective recovery from psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 208 (3), 203 -209.
  13. Morton, S.E., O'Hare, K.J., Maha, J.L., Nicolson, M.P., Machado, L., Topless, R., Merriman, T.R., Linscott, R.J., 2016. Testing the validity of taxonic schizotypy using genetic and environmental risk variables. Schizophr. Bull. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw108. · DOI
  14. van Os, J., Kapur, S., 2009. Schizophrenia. Lancet 374:635 -645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(09)60995-8.
  15. Pickering, L., Simpson, J., Bentall, R.P., 2008. Insecure attachment predicts proneness to paranoia but not hallucinations. Personal. Individ. Differ. 44 (5), 1212 -1224. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0130)
  16. Poulton, R., Caspi, A., Mof fi tt, T.E., Cannon, M., Murray, R., Harrington, H., 2000. Children's self-reported psychotic symptoms and adult schizophreniform disorder: a 15-year longitudinal study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 57 (11), 1053 -1058.
  17. Rawlings, D., Williams, B., Haslam, N., Claridge, G., 2008. Taxometric analysis supports a dimensional latent structure for schizotypy. Personal. Individ. Differ. 44 (8), 1640 -1651.
  18. Reininghaus, U., Böhnke, J.R., Hosang, G., Farmer, A., Burns, T., McGuf fi n, P., Bentall, R.P., 2016. Evaluation of the validity and utility of a transdiagnostic psychosis dimension encompassing schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry http://dx.doi. org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.167882. · DOI
  19. Ruscio, J., Haslam, N., Ruscio, A.M., 2006. Introduction to the Taxometric Method: a Practical Guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0155)
  20. Ruscio, J., Ruscio, A.M., Meron, M., 2007. Applying the bootstrap to taxometric analysis: generating empirical sampling distributions to help interpret results. Multivar. Behav. Res. 42 (2), 349 -386. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0160)
  21. Varese, F., Barkus, E., Bentall, R.P., 2011. Dissociative and metacognitive factors in hallucination-proneness when controlling for comorbid symptoms. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 16 (3), 193 -217.
  22. Varese, F., Barkus, E., Bentall, R.P., 2012. Dissociation mediates the relationship between childhood trauma and hallucination-proneness. Psychol. Med. 42, 1025 -1036. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0180)
  23. Waller, N.G., Meehl, P.E., 1998. Multivariate Taxometric Procedures: Distinguishing Types From Continua. Sage Publications Inc.
  24. Walters, G.D., Ruscio, J., 2009. Where do we draw the line? Assigning cases to subsamples for MAMBAC, MAXCOV, and MAXEIG taxometric analyses. Assessment 17 (3), 321 -333.
  25. Wickham, S., Sitko, K., Bentall, R.P., 2015. Insecure attachment is associated with paranoia but not hallucinations in psychotic patients: the mediating role of negative self-esteem. Psychol. Med. 45 (07), 1495 -1507. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0920-9964(1730142-1/rf0205)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elahi, A., Perez Algorta, G., Varese, F., McIntyre, J. C., & Bentall, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Elahi, A.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
190
Pages
77-81
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593267984
Cited by
124
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
persecutory delusions
MeSH terms
Adult, Delusions, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Paranoid Behavior, Paranoid Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Risk, Principal Component Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review