Cited by 63Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth disparities and outcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Three-item loneliness scale: psychometric properties and normative data of the Spanish version

Open access
Trucharte, A., Calderón, L., Cerezo, E., Contreras, A., Peinado, V., Valiente, C.·2023·Current Psychology

Abstract

Loneliness is a common social phenomenon across countries with negative effects in health. Thus, the measurement of loneliness is of paramount importance. The Three-Item Loneliness Scale (TILS) was designed to be used in large-population surveys as a quick measure of loneliness. The aim of this study is to provide a Spanish validation of the TILS. A representative sample of the Spanish population (N = 1951) was used. We analysed the psychometric properties, factor structure, and distribution demographics characteristics of the Spanish TILS. Analyses showed differences regarding age, gender, educational level, employment status, household composition and annual gross income in line with previous literature. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a unifactorial structure, with significant moderate correlations between the TILS and depression, anxiety, paranoia and well-being, and mild significant correlations with belongingness and mistrust. The internal consistency of the Spanish TILS was good (α = 0.82). Our study indicates that the TILS is a valid and reliable measure of loneliness in the Spanish population. Loneliness is a modern epidemic and a precursor of mental and health problems that reduced the quality of life. Therefore, it is important to have reliable measures of this phenomenon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-021-02110-x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2005). People Thinking About People: The Vicious Cycle of Being a Social Outcast in One's Own Mind. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 91–108). Psychology Press.
  2. Peplau LA Perlman D Peplau LA Perlman D Perspectives on loneliness Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1–18) 1982 Wiley

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trucharte, A., Calderón, L., Cerezo, E., Contreras, A., Peinado, V., & Valiente, C.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Trucharte, A.
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2021-07-16
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
7466-7474
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W3183947086
Cited by
63
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Innovation ((PSI2016-74987-P))
  • Instituto Carlos III ((COV20/00737-CM))
  • UCM for consolidated research groups ((GR29/20))
  • doctoral fellowship ((CT42/18))
  • Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness doctoral Fellowship ((BES- 2017082015))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
loneliness, Spanish adaptation, psychometric validation, reference values, factor structure, depression, anxiety, paranoia, well-being, sense of belonging, distrust, internal consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review