CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Gaussian Boson sampling

Zhong, Han-Sen, Peng, Li-Chao, Li, Yuan, Hu, Yi, Li, Wei, Qin, Jian, Wu, Dian, Zhang, Weijun, Li, Hao, Zhang, Lu, Wang, Zhen, You, Lixing, Jiang, Xiao, Li, Li, Liu, Nai-Le, Dowling, Jonathan P., Lu, Chao-Yang, Pan, Jian-Wei·2019·Science Bulletin
DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.007

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Harrow, 2017, Quantum computational supremacy, Nature, 549, 203, 10.1038/nature23458 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aaronson, 2014, Boson sampling is far from uniform, Quan Inf Comput, 14, 1383
  3. Wang, 2017, High-efficiency multiphoton Boson sampling, Nat Photonics, 11, 361, 10.1038/nphoton.2017.63 · DOI
  4. He, 2017, Time-bin-encoded Boson sampling with a single-photon device, Phys Rev Lett, 118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.190501 · DOI
  5. Wang, 2018, Toward scalable Boson sampling with photon loss, Phys Rev Lett, 120, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.230502 · DOI
  6. Ding, 2016, On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar, Phys Rev Lett, 116, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.020401 · DOI · Paper page
  7. He YM, Wang H, Gerhardt S, et al., Polarized indistinguishable single photons from a quantum dot in an elliptical micropillar. ArXiv:1809.10992, 2018. · arXiv
  8. Somaschi, 2016, Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state, Nat Photonics, 10, 340, 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lund, 2014, Boson sampling from a Gaussian State, Phys Rev Lett, 113, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.100502 · DOI
  10. Aaronson, 2016, Boson sampling with lost photons, Phys Rev A, 93, 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012335 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Barkhofen, 2017, Driven Boson sampling, Phys Rev Lett, 118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.020502 · DOI
  12. Hamilton, 2017, Gaussian Boson sampling, Phys Rev Lett, 119, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.170501 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Motes, 2013, Spontaneous parametric down-conversion photon sources are scalable in the asymptotic limit for Boson sampling, Phys Rev A, 88, 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.063822 · DOI
  14. Renema J, Shchesnovich V, Garcia-Patron R, Quantum-to-classical transition in many-body bosonic interference. ArXiv:1809.01953, 2018. · arXiv
  15. Huh, 2015, Boson sampling for molecular vibronic spectra, Nat Photonics, 9, 615, 10.1038/nphoton.2015.153 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Banchi L, Fingerhuth M, Babej T, et al., Molecular docking with Gaussian Boson sampling. ArXiv:1902.00462, 2019. · DOI
  17. Arrazola, 2018, Quantum approximate optimization with Gaussian Boson sampling, Phys Rev A, 98, 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012322 · DOI
  18. Brádler, 2018, Gaussian Boson sampling for perfect matchings of arbitrary graphs, Phys Rev A, 98, 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032310 · DOI
  19. Arrazola, 2018, Using Gaussian Boson sampling to find dense subgraphs, Phys Rev Lett, 121, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.030503 · DOI
  20. Bradler K, Friedland S, Izaac J, et al., Graph isomorphism and Gaussian Boson sampling. ArXiv:1810.10644, 2018. · arXiv
  21. Mosley, 2008, Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states, Phys Rev Lett, 100, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.133601 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rahimi-Keshari, 2015, What can quantum optics say about computational complexity theory?, Phys Rev Lett, 114, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.060501 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 73

Metadata

Authors
Zhong, H.-S., Peng, L.-C., Li, Y., Hu, Y., Li, W., Qin, J., Wu, D., Zhang, W., Li, H., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., You, L., Jiang, X., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Dowling, J. P., Lu, C.-Y., & Pan, J.-W.
Venue
Science Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
64
Issue
8
Pages
511-515
ISSN
2095-9273
DOI
10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.007
Cited by
73
References
9
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91836303, 11674308, 11525419)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences, the National Fundamental Research Program (2018YFA0306100)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review