The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of evidence: Are endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the aquatic environment impacting fish populations?
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, evidence from the current literature is presented that addresses either of two questions: 1) do EDCs in the aquatic environment have the potential to impact the reproductive health and survival of various fish species, and 2) are EDCs in the aquatic environment actually impacting the reproductive health and sustainability of indigenous populations of fish? Overall, data from laboratory experiments support the hypothesis that EDCs in the aquatic environment can impact the reproductive health of various fish species, but evidence that EDCs in the aquatic environment are actually impacting the reproductive health and sustainability of indigenous fish populations is less convincing. The scarcity of evidence linking impacts of environmental EDCs with changes in reproductive success of indigenous fish populations may reflect a critical need for a dependable method or indicator to assess reproduction of fish in situ. In addition, more studies that investigate whether fish populations routinely exposed to EDCs in situ are experiencing changes in population structure are needed. Linking endocrine disruption and reproductive impairment with an ecologically relevant impact on the sustainability of real fish populations remains, with few exceptions, an open challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Bayley, M., Junge, M., & Baatrup, E. (2002) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0166-445x(01)00210-7 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Barnes, K. K., Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Zaugg, S. D., Meyer, M. T., & Barber, L. B. (2008) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.028 · Cited by 741
Caldwell, D. J., Mastrocco, F., Anderson, P. D., Länge, R., & Sumpter, J. P. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.1825 · Cited by 373
Indirect Potable Reuse: A Sustainable Water Supply Alternative
Rodriguez, C., Van Buynder, P., Lugg, R., Blair, P., Devine, B., Cook, A., & Weinstein, P. (2009) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph6031174 · Cited by 210
Rice, J., & Westerhoff, P. (2017) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2984 · Cited by 167
Ockenden, A., Tremblay, L. A., Dikareva, N., & Simon, K. S. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148507 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Mills, L. J., & Chichester, C.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 343
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001410930
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of evidence: Are endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the aquatic environment impacting fish populations? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.070
- The paper
- Mills, L. J., & Chichester, C. (2005). Review of evidence: Are endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the aquatic environment impacting fish populations? Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.