Cited by 308Phosphorus and nutrient managementSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Sustainable use of phosphorus: a finite resource

Scholz, Roland W., Ulrich, Andrea E., Eilittä, Marjatta, Roy, Amit·2013·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Phosphorus is an essential element of life and of the modern agricultural system. Today, science, policy, agro-industry and other stakeholder groups are increasingly concerned about the sustainable use of this resource, given the dissipative nature of phosphorus and difficulties in assessing, evaluating, and coping with phosphorus pollution in aquatic and terrestrial systems. We argue that predictions about a forthcoming peak, followed by a quick reduction (i.e., physical phosphate rock scarcity) are unreasoned and stress that access to phosphorus (economic scarcity) is already, and may increasingly become critical, in particular for smallholders farmers in different parts of the world. The paper elaborates on the design, development, goals and cutting-edge contributions of a global transdisciplinary process (i.e. mutual learning between science and society including multiple stakeholders) on the understanding of potential contributions and risks related to the current mode of using phosphorus on multiple scales (Global TraPs). While taking a global and comprehensive view on the whole phosphorus-supply chain, Global TraPs organizes and integrates multiple transdisciplinary case studies to better answer questions which inform sustainable future phosphorus use. Its major goals are to contribute to four issues central to sustainable resource management: i) long-term management of biogeochemical cycles, in particular the challenge of closing the phosphorus cycle, ii) achieving food security, iii) avoiding environmental pollution and iv) sustainability learning on a global level by transdisciplinary processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.043

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scholz, R. W., Ulrich, A. E., Eilittä, M., & Roy, A.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • International Fertilizer Development Center (US)
Corresponding author
Scholz, Roland W.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
461-462
Pages
799-803
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994211429
Cited by
308
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1
FWCI
27.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
phosphorus, phosphorus cycling, phosphorus pollution, transdisciplinary research, smallholder farmers, food security, biogeochemical cycles, environmental pollution, sustainability learning
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fertilizers, Food Supply, International Cooperation, Phosphorus, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review