Cited by 109Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluoride Effects and RemovalWater Treatment and Disinfection

Perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in the Pra and Kakum River basins and associated tap water in Ghana

Essumang, David K., Eshun, Albert, Hogarh, Jonathan N., Bentum, John K., Adjei, Joseph K., Negishi, Junya, Nakamichi, Shihori, Habibullah-Al-Mamun, Md +1 more·2017·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) are persistent environmental pollutants that have been detected in various media including human serum. Due to concerns regarding their bioaccumulation and possible negative health effects, an understanding of routes of human exposure is necessary. PFAAs are recalcitrant in many water treatment processes, making drinking water a potential source of human exposure. This study presents the first report on contamination from PFAAs in river and drinking water in Ghana. The targeted PFAAs were perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) with C 4-14 carbon chain and perfluoroalkane sulphonic acids (PFSAs) with C 6, 8, 10 . Five PFAA congeners - PFOA, PFOS, PFHxA, PFDA and PFPeA - were commonly detected in river and tap water. The mean concentrations of ∑PFAAs in the Kakum and Pra Rivers were 281 and 398ng/L, while tap water (supplied from the treatment of water from those rivers) contained concentrations of 197 and 200ng/L, respectively. PFOA and PFOS constituted about 99% of the ∑PFAAs. The risk quotient (RQ) attributed to drinking of tap water was estimated at 1.01 and 1.74 for PFOA and PFOS, respectively. For a country that has not produced these compounds, the RQs were unexpectedly high, raising concerns particularly about contamination from such emerging pollutants in local water sources. The study revealed limitations of local tap water treatment in getting rid of these emerging pollutants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.035

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Essumang, D. K., Eshun, A., Hogarh, J. N., Bentum, J. K., Adjei, J. K., Negishi, J., Nakamichi, S., Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M., & Masunaga, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Coast (GH)
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
  • Yokohama National University (JP)
Corresponding author
Essumang, David K.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
579
Pages
729-735
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549091123
Cited by
109
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H02973)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
perfluoroalkyl acids, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, perfluorohexanoic acid, perfluorodecanoic acid, PFPeA, tap water, drinking water contamination, human exposure, risk quotient, emerging contaminants, Ghana
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Ghana, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Rivers, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review