Cited by 45Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAlgal biology and biofuel productionWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Production of lipid-containing algal-bacterial polyculture in wastewater and biomethanation of lipid extracted residues: Enhancing methane yield through hydrothermal pretreatment and relieving solvent toxicity through co-digestion

Open access
Bohutskyi, Pavlo, Phan, Duc, Spierling, Ruth E., Kopachevsky, Anatoliy M., Bouwer, Edward J., Lundquist, Trygve J., Betenbaugh, Michael J.·2019·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The feasibility of generating a lipid-containing algal-bacterial polyculture biomass in municipal primary wastewater and enhancing biomethanation of lipid-extracted algal residues (LEA) through hydrothermal pretreatment and co-digestion with sewage sludge (SS) was investigated. In high-rate algal ponds, the polyculture of native algal and bacteria species demonstrated a monthly average net and gross biomass productivity of 30 ± 3 and 36 ± 3 g AFDW m-2 day-1 (summer season). The algal community was dominated by Micractinium sp. followed by Scenedesmus sp., Chlorella sp., pennate diatoms and Chlamydomonas sp. The polyculture metabolic activities resulted in average reductions of wastewater volatile suspended solids (VSS), carbonaceous soluble biochemical oxygen demand (csBOD 5) and total nitrogen (N total) of 63 ± 18%, 98 ± 1% and 76 ± 21%, respectively. Harvested biomass contained nearly 23% lipid content and an extracted blend of fatty acid methyl esters satisfied the ASTM D6751 standard for biodiesel. Anaerobic digestion of lipid extracted algal residues (LEA) demonstrated long lag-phase in methane production of 17 days and ultimate methane yield of 296 ± 2 mL/gVS (or ~50% of theoretical), likely because to its limited biodegradability and toxicity due to presence of the residual solvent (hexane). Hydrothermal pretreatment increased the ultimate methane yield and production rate by 15-30% but did not mitigate solvent toxicity effects completely leading to less substantial improvement in energy output of 5-20% and diminished Net Energy Ratio (NER < 1). In contrast, co-digestion of LEA with sewage sludge (10% to 90% ratio) was found to minimize solvent toxicity and improve methane yield enhancing the energy output ~4-fold, compared to using LEA as a single substrate, and advancing NER to 4.2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.026

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although methane production of the lipid-extracted biomass was low (296 ± 2 mL/gVS), the biomethane potential was maximized by hydrothermal liquefaction pretreatment and co-digestion with sewage sludge.

    “Although methane production of the lipid-extracted biomass was low (296 ± 2 mL/gVS), the biomethane potential was maximized by hydrothermal liquefaction pretreatment (to increase biomass biodegradability) and co-digestion with sewage sludge (to reduce toxicity due to solvent residues).”
  • The harvested biomass contained around 23% lipid content, including fatty acid methyl esters optimal for biodiesel production.

    “The harvested biomass contained around 23% lipid content, including fatty acid methyl esters optimal for biodiesel production.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohutskyi, P., Phan, D., Spierling, R. E., Kopachevsky, A. M., Bouwer, E. J., Lundquist, T. J., & Betenbaugh, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • California Polytechnic State University (US)
  • V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University (UA)
Corresponding author
Bohutskyi, Pavlo
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
653
Pages
1377-1394
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899970160
Cited by
45
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • DOE (DE-AC05-76L01830, DE-EE0005994)
  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  • CEC (ARV-10-027)
  • CBET (1236691)
  • U.S. EPA (SU835717)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
lipid extraction, biodiesel feedstock, municipal wastewater treatment, hydrothermal pretreatment, anaerobic digestion, co-digestion, sewage sludge, methane yield, fatty acid methyl esters, net energy ratio, high rate algal ponds, algal community composition, nitrogen removal
MeSH terms
Chlorophyta, Bacteria, Kinetics, Lipids, Methane, Sewage, Solvents, Biomass, Coculture Techniques, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review