The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis on the carbon emission peaks of China's industrial, building, transport, and agricultural sectors
Abstract
Carbon emission peak has become a focus of political and academic concern in global community since the launch of Kyoto Protocol. China, as the largest carbon emitter, has committed to reaching the carbon peak by 2030 in Paris Agreement. This ambitious national goal requires the endeavors of individual sectors, particularly those carbon-intensive ones. Predicting the sectoral peaks under current endeavors and understanding driving forces for the carbon emission changes in the past years are substantial for guiding the allocation of the country's future efforts. In the past studies contextualized in China, the prediction of its carbon peaks seldom appeared at the sectoral level, which is considered as a research gap. Therefore, this study predicts the peaks at four carbon pillar sectors (i.e. industrial, building, transport and agricultural sectors) and identifies the driving forces for the carbon emission changes of them. This study hypothesized Carbon Kuznets curve (CKC) as the theoretical model for predicting the peaks and used Logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) as the method to identify the driving forces. The results show that the carbon emission in the country will peak in 2036, six years later than the agreed year. The lateness of the national peak can be attributed to the significant lateness of three pillar sectors' peaks, occurring in 2031 for the industrial sector, 2035 for the building sector, 2043 for the transport sector, peak for the agricultural sector occurs four years earlier in 2026 though. Furthermore, the results show that carbon emission is significantly driven by the booming economic output and inhibited by decreasing energy intensity, but the slight fluctuation of energy structure plays a minor role in the four sectors. Policy adjustments are proposed for effectively and efficiently urging the on-time occurrence of the national peak.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
Cited by
Ma, M., Ma, X., Cai, W., & Cai, W. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115247 · Cited by 267
Echelon Utilization of Retired Power Lithium-Ion Batteries: Challenges and Prospects
Wang, N., Garg, A., Su, S., Mou, J., Gao, L., & Li, W. (2022) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries8080096 · Cited by 72
Shi, K., Shen, J., Wu, Y., Liu, S., & Li, L. (2021) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2021.1946605 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, X., Shuai, C., Wu, Y., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 709
- Pages
- 135768
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991296655
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis on the carbon emission peaks of China's industrial, building, transport, and agricultural sectors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135768
- The paper
- Chen, X., Shuai, C., Wu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Analysis on the carbon emission peaks of China's industrial, building, transport, and agricultural sectors. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135768
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.