The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthetic organic dyes as contaminants of the aquatic environment and their implications for ecosystems: A review
Abstract
In recent years interest in the fate of chemical compounds in the aquatic environment has increased. There are many reports of the presence of chemical compounds such as pesticides, steroid hormones or antibiotics in the aquatic environment. At present, little is known about synthetic organic dyes as contaminants of water bodies. These dyes are omnipresent in many application areas from the textile, tannery, cosmetic and food industries to human and veterinary medicine. Their large-scale production and widespread applications have caused synthetic organic dyes to permeate into different compartments of water and soil environment. So far, dyes have been determined in environmental samples such as water, suspended particulate matters, sediment and wild fish. For this reason, they are considered micropollutants of aquatic ecosystems. Due to the toxicological properties and pharmacological activity of some synthetic organic dyes their occurrence in water bodies should be monitored. The hazard potential of synthetic organic dyes should be assessed, especially their influence on aquatic biota, not least because dyes in water ecosystems may pose a threat to animal or human health as higher-order consumers. This review collects scientific data considering application areas, toxicity, sources, environmental occurrence and the fate of synthetic organic dyes and the ecological implications of synthetic organic dyes presence in the total environment. Moreover, analytical methods for dye determination and methods for dye removal from wastewater are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard
Kant, R. (2012) · Natural Science · doi:10.4236/ns.2012.41004 · Cited by 1,545
Dye Sensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy
Ormond, A., & Freeman, H. (2013) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma6030817 · Cited by 847
Biodegradation of Synthetic Dyes—A Review
Ali, H. (2010) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-010-0382-4 · Cited by 817
Textile Dyes: Dyeing Process and Environmental Impact
Drumond Chequer, F. M., de Oliveira, G. A. R., Anastacio Ferraz, E. R., Carvalho, J., Boldrin Zanoni, M. V., & de Oliveir, D. P. (2013) · Eco-Friendly Textile Dyeing and Finishing · doi:10.5772/53659 · Cited by 706
(2012) · doi:10.5772/32373 · Cited by 640
Ogugbue, C. J., & Sawidis, T. (2011) · Biotechnology Research International · doi:10.4061/2011/967925 · Cited by 331
Analysis of Dyes in Cosmetics: Challenges and Recent Developments
Guerra, E., Llompart, M., & Garcia-Jares, C. (2018) · Cosmetics · doi:10.3390/cosmetics5030047 · Cited by 183
Classification and naming of dyes, stains and fluorochromes
Kiernan, J. (2001) · Biotechnic & Histochemistry · doi:10.1080/bih.76.5-6.261.278 · Cited by 129
Croce, R., Cinà, F., Lombardo, A., Crispeyn, G., Cappelli, C. I., Vian, M., Maiorana, S., Benfenati, E., & Baderna, D. (2017) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.05.046 · Cited by 128
Toxic textile dyes accumulate in wild European eel Anguilla anguilla
Belpaire, C., Reyns, T., Geeraerts, C., & Van Loco, J. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.007 · Cited by 112
Cited by
A Brief History of Colour, the Environmental Impact of Synthetic Dyes and Removal by Using Laccases
Ardila-Leal, L. D., Poutou-Piñales, R. A., Pedroza-Rodríguez, A. M., & Quevedo-Hidalgo, B. E. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26133813 · Cited by 544
Karić, N., Maia, A. S., Teodorović, A., Atanasova, N., Langergraber, G., Crini, G., Ribeiro, A. R. L., & Đolić, M. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100239 · Cited by 466
A review on magnetic sensors for monitoring of hazardous pollutants in water resources
Hojjati-Najafabadi, A., Mansoorianfar, M., Liang, T., Shahin, K., & Karimi-Maleh, H. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153844 · Cited by 367
RetractedHama Aziz, K. H., Fatah, N. M., & Muhammad, K. T. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.232033 · Cited by 128
Fundamental properties and sustainable applications of the natural zeolite clinoptilolite
Grifasi, N., Ziantoni, B., Fino, D., & Piumetti, M. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-33656-5 · Cited by 88
“They are classified as micropollutants due to their low concentration (ng/l to μg/l) and exhibit toxicity and non-biodegradability (Tkaczyk et al. 2020; Yusuf 2019).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Tkaczyk, A., Mitrowska, K., & Posyniak, A.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 717
- Pages
- 137222
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3004673318
- Cited by
- 1,876
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 41.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic organic dyes as contaminants of the aquatic environment and their implications for ecosystems: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137222
- The paper
- Tkaczyk, A., Mitrowska, K., & Posyniak, A. (2020). Synthetic organic dyes as contaminants of the aquatic environment and their implications for ecosystems: A review. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.