Integrated ABR and UASB System for Dairy Wastewater Treatment: Engineering Design and Practice
Abstract
This work designed and assessed the engineering performance of dairy wastewater treatment by an integrated system consisting of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) and an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB). With fats adsorbed and decomposed, proteins were first denatured coagulated into solids in the ABR treatment process, and this process created suitable conditions for sludge retention in the sludge bed of the UASB. As a result, the combined system achieved a substantial reduction in excess sludge from 3 to 5 t/d to 3 t/m, notable biogas generation, and 98% COD removal, while the other pollutants in the effluent met relevant standards. In addition, the system attained an excellent performance in terms of the energy consumption and water treatment agent amount. Two active plants achieved operation costs lower than 0.5 kW h/t, while stable operations under ambient temperature conditions lasted longer than three years. Engineering practices both technically and economically affirmed the potential of the proposed system for dairy wastewater treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Miniaturized dielectric barrier discharge-molecular emission spectrometry determines total sulfur dioxide in algae food with a good linear relationship, accurate detection results, low cost, and compact and small detection equipment.
“In addition, the total sulfur dioxide in algae food was determined by miniaturized dielectric barrier discharge—molecular emission spectrometry, this method has a good linear relationship, accurate detection results, low cost, compact and small detection equipment [106].”
From Current Status and Future Trends in Removal, Control, and Mitigation of Algae Food Safety Risks for Human Consumption (2022) · cites this paper as [106]
Cites
Demirel, B., & Scherer, P. (2008) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-008-9131-1 · Cited by 1,200 · see citing works
Cheese whey wastewater: Characterization and treatment
Carvalho, F., Prazeres, A. R., & Rivas, J. (2013) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.038 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Treatment and utilization of dairy industrial waste: A review
Ahmad, T., Aadil, R. M., Ahmed, H., Rahman, U. U., Soares, B. C. V., Souza, S. L. Q., Pimentel, T. C., Scudino, H., Guimarães, J. T., Esmerino, E. A., et al. (2019) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.003 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste—Effects of lipid concentration
Cirne, D. G., Paloumet, X., Björnsson, L., Alves, M. M., & Mattìasson, B. (2006) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2006.04.003 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Dilemma of Sewage Sludge Treatment and Disposal in China
Feng, L., Luo, J., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01455 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Treatment of dairy effluents by electrocoagulation using aluminium electrodes
Tchamango, S. R., Nanseu‐Njiki, C. P., Ngameni, E., et al. (2009) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.026 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Mainardis, M., Buttazzoni, M., & Goi, D. (2020) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering7020043 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Biosorption of long-chain fatty acids in UASB treatment process
Hwu, C.-S., Tseng, S., Yuan, C.-Y., et al. (1998) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(97)00352-7 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Industrial wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation process
Babu, D. S., Singh, T. S. A., Nidheesh, P. V., & Kumar, M. S. (2019) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/01496395.2019.1671866 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Akansha, J., Nidheesh, P. V., Gopinath, A., et al. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126652 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Sustainability of dairy and soy processing: A review on wastewater recycling
Wang, Y., & Serventi, L. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117821 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
de Andrade, L. H., Mendes, F. D. S., Espíndola, J. C., et al. (2014) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.056 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Goswami, L., Kumar, R. V., Pakshirajan, K., & Pugazhenthi, G. (2018) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.029 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Ashekuzzaman, S. M., Forrestal, P. J., Richards, K. G., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.025 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Liew, Y. X., Chan, Y. J., Manickam, S., Chong, M. F., Chong, S., Tiong, T. J., Lim, J. W., & Pan, G. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136373 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Dairy Industry Wastewater Sources, Characteristics & its Effects on Environment
Shete, B. S., & Shinkar, N. P. (2013) · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Digestion of a milk-fat emulsion
Petruy, R. (1997) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(97)00042-4 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Protein recovery from sludge: A review
Xiao, K., & Zhou, Y. C. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119373 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Lauer, M., Hansen, J., Lamers, P., et al. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.026 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Feasibility of combined UASB and MBR system in dairy wastewater treatment at ambient temperatures
Buntner, D., Sánchez, A., & Garrido, J. M. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.043 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Vehicle emission trends and spatial distribution in Shandong province, China, from 2000 to 2014
Sun, S., Jiang, W., & Gao, W. (2016) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.065 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
McAteer, P. G., Trego, A. C., Thorn, C. E., et al. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123221 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Charalambous, P., Shin, J., Shin, S. G., et al. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.091 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Rico, C., Muñoz, N., Fernández, J., & Rico, J. L. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.050 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
McKeown, R., Scully, C., Mahony, T., et al. (2009) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.01.015 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Luo, J., & Ding, L. (2011) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.025 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Water recovery from dairy rinse water by reverse osmosis: Giving value to water and milk solids
Brião, V. B., Salla, A. C. V., Miorando, T., et al. (2018) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.007 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Amini, M., Younesi, H., Zinatizadeh, A. A., et al. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.111 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Treatment of synthetic milk industry wastewater using batch dissolved air flotation
Pereira, M. D. S., Borges, A. C., Heleno, F. F., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.065 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Kushwaha, J. P., Srivastava, V. C., & Mall, I. D. (2013) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2013.08.018 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Extraction of single-cell protein from activated sewage sludge: thermal solubilization of protein
Shier, W. T., & Purwono, S. K. (1994) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/0960-8524(94)90079-5 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Haridas, A., Suresh, S., Chitra, K., et al. (2005) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.013 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Dąbrowski, W., Żyłka, R., & Malinowski, P. (2016) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.001 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Reynaud, N., & Buckley, C. A. (2015) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2015.539 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Recovery of proteins and lipids from dairy wastewater using food grade sodium lignosulphonate
Kurup, G. G., Adhikari, B., & Zisu, B. (2019) · Water Resources and Industry · doi:10.1016/j.wri.2019.100114 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Passeggi, M., López, I., & Borzacconi, L. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.022 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Hirooka, K., Asano, R., Yokoyama, A., et al. (2009) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.011 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Singh, S., Rinta‐Kanto, J. M., Kettunen, R. H., et al. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.136 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Martín-Rilo, S., Coimbra, R. N., Martín-Villacorta, J., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.026 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Kundu, K., Bergmann, I., Hahnke, S., et al. (2013) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.08.023 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Su, C., Lu, Y., Deng, Q., et al. (2019) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.112 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Anaerobic granular reactors for the treatment of dairy wastewater: A review
Karadağ, D., Köroğlu, E. O., Özkaya, B., Çakmakçı, M., Heaven, S., Banks, C. J., & Serna-Maza, A. (2015) · International Journal of Dairy Technology · doi:10.1111/1471-0307.12252 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Bialek, K., Cysneiros, D., & O’Flaherty, V. (2013) · Archaea · doi:10.1155/2013/346171 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Liu, T., Guo, J., Hu, S., et al. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105501 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
GOMES, D. R. S., Papa, L. G., Cichello, G. C. V., et al. (2011) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.067 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Hurst, J. J., Wallace, J. S., & Aga, D. S. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.028 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Miryahyaei, S., Das, T., Othman, M. Z., et al. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139214 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Wang, K., Soares, A., Jefferson, B., et al. (2020) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.115754 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Effect of Prehydrolysis of Milk Fat on its Conversion to Biogas
Sage, M., Daufin, G., & Gésan-Guiziou, G. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0931 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Tong, S., Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Feng, C., Xu, B., & Zhu, M. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.094 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Coelho, N. M., Rodrigues, A. A., Arroja, L., et al. (2006) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.21095 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Couras, C., dos Louros, V. L., Gameiro, T., et al. (2015) · Environmental Technology · doi:10.1080/09593330.2015.1025102 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Optimal design and operation of a UASB reactor for dairy cattle manure
Haugen, F. A., Bakke, R., Lie, B., et al. (2015) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.01.001 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ryder, K., Ali, M., Billakanti, J., & Carne, A. (2018) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.11.007 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Li, W., & Huang, C. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138089 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wu, G., Zhuang, D., Chew, K. W., Ling, T. C., Khoo, K. S., Van Quyen, D., Feng, S., & Show, P. L. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27196633 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ji, S., Ma, W., Wei, Q., Zhang, W., Jiang, F., & Chen, J.
- Affiliations
- Yunnan University (CN)
- Tianjin Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ji, Siping
- Chen, Jing
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 749
- Pages
- 142267
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3083996691
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Keywords
- dairy wastewater treatment, anaerobic baffled reactor, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket, protein coagulation, sludge retention, excess sludge reduction, biogas production, COD removal, energy consumption, operating costs, room-temperature operation
- MeSH terms
- Anaerobiosis, Sewage, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Bioreactors, Wastewater
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review