Cited by 25Fire effects on ecosystemsThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Stable polycyclic aromatic carbon (SPAC) formation in wildfire chars and engineered biochars

Howell, Alexandra, Helmkamp, Sophia, Belmont, Erica·2022·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Pyrogenic carbon (PyC) is an important component of wildfire chars and engineered biochars due to its potential environmental longevity, the most environmentally stable fraction of which is called stable polycyclic aromatic carbon (SPAC) and is projected to persist in global environments for >1000 yr. Rigorous characterization of SPAC, whether formed in wildfires or engineered, is essential for accurate global carbon cycle models. However, the quantification of SPAC remains challenging and methods for its direct characterization are often inaccessible and/or highly specialized. Additionally, these methods often rely on SPAC formation measured in laboratory biochars produced in inert environments, which have been shown to correlate poorly with wildfire chars and/or engineered biochars manufactured in oxidative environments. The present study investigated the relationship between SPAC formation and physicochemical metrics - mass loss and molar H:C and O:C ratios - that capture the influences of multiple formation variables, including gas environment temperature, O 2 availability, and pyrolysis duration, and negates the need for these variables to be directly measured. SPAC content is measured in this study using hydrogen pyrolysis (HyPy), which is an established accurate method for characterizing that most environmentally stable PyC fraction. Results show that SPAC formation and elemental ratios correlate linearly with increased mass loss, which is reflective of increased pyrol…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157610

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howell, A., Helmkamp, S., & Belmont, E.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
Belmont, Erica
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
849
Pages
157610
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288060873
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1847498)
  • NSF
  • University of Wyoming (1655726)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
pyrogenic carbon, engineered biochar, mass loss, carbon sequestration
MeSH terms
Wildfires, Carbon, Charcoal, Hydrogen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review