Biochar application rate regulates soil microbial processes and nutrient dynamics in compost-amended urban agricultural soils
Open accessAbstract
Urban agriculture soils are commonly amended with compost to improve fertility, yet the functional responses of these systems to biochar additions across application rates remain poorly understood. We conducted a field experiment at Three Sisters Gardens (West Sacramento, CA, USA) to evaluate how biochar applied at 0, 10, 20, and 30 t ha −1 influenced soil physical, chemical, and biological indicators in compost-amended plots under corn and squash production. Late-season soils were analyzed for various physical and biochemical properties. Results showed that biochar effects varied across application rates and functional domains. Intermediate application rates (10–20 t ha −1 ) improved aggregate stability and increased soil respiration, indicating moderate effects on soil physical structure and microbial activity. In contrast, the highest biochar rate (30 t ha −1 ) produced the strongest biological responses, including increases in microbial biomass, fungal:bacterial ratios, and extracellular enzyme activities involved in nitrogen and phosphorus cycling. Despite these biological responses, soil pH and cation exchange capacity did not differ significantly among treatments. Regression analyses indicated that nutrient availability was more strongly associated with microbial indicators than with bulk soil chemical properties, suggesting that biochar-associated changes in nutrient dynamics were consistent with microbial mediation of nutrient cycling. These patterns were broadly consistent across cropping systems despite crop-specific differences in nutrient pools and microbial biomass. Together, these results indicate that biochar application produced distinct functional responses along a dose gradient, with intermediate rates influencing soil physical properties and higher rates being associated with stronger microbial and biochemical responses related to nutrient cycling. Optimizing biochar application rates may therefore be important for enhancing soil biological activity and nutrient availability in compost-amended urban agricultural systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: Biochar modulating soil biological health: A review
Bolan, S., Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, M., Rao, C. S., Nataraj, K. C., Singh, G., Vinu, A., Bhowmik, A., Sharma, H., et al. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169585 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
RetractedSoil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960 · see citing works
Effects of biochar on soil available inorganic nitrogen: a review and meta-analysis
Nguyen, T. T. N., Xu, C.-Y., Tahmasbian, I., Che, R., Xu, Z., Zhou, X., Wallace, H. M., & Bai, S. H. (2017) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.004 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Borchard, N., Schirrmann, M., Cayuela, M. L., Kammann, C., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Estavillo, J. M., Fuertes-Mendizábal, T., Sigua, G., Spokas, K., Ippolito, J. A., et al. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.060 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Pokharel, P., Ma, Z., & Chang, S. X. (2020) · Biochar · doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00039-1 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Comparison of Soil Quality Index Using Three Methods
Mukherjee, A., & Lal, R. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105981 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Gao, S., Hoffman-Krull, K., Bidwell, A. L., & DeLuca, T. H. (2016) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.028 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationStable polycyclic aromatic carbon (SPAC) formation in wildfire chars and engineered biochars
Howell, A., Helmkamp, S., & Belmont, E. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157610 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Gao, S., Burce, K., Smith, L., Espinoza, N., & Melbourne, A.
- Affiliations
- California State University System (US)
- Three Sisters Gardens
- Venue
- Frontiers in Soil Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2026-05-20
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2673-8619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7161768106
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Soil Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
- Keywords
- biochar application rate, compost application, soil microbial processes, nutrient cycling, soil respiration, soil aggregate stability, microbial biomass, fungal to bacterial ratio, extracellular enzyme activity, nitrogen cycling, phosphorus cycling, soil physical properties, soil chemical properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review