Cited by 6Analytical chemistry methods developmentIonic liquids properties and applicationsPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Extraction for Isolating Non-Phthalate Plastic Additives from Radish Samples (Raphanus sativus L.)

Open access
Capilla-Flores, Raquel, Carbonell-Rozas, Laura, López-Ruíz, Rosalía, Garrido Frenich, Antonia, Romero-González, Roberto·2025·Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy

Abstract

Non-phthalate plastic additives (NPPAs) are increasingly used as alternatives to phthalates in plastic manufacturing, but their presence in food crops and associated health risks remain largely underexplored. Thus, a natural deep eutectic solvent-based solid-liquid extraction (NADES-SLE) was developed for determining NPPAs in radish ( Raphanus sativus L.) roots and leaves. Five NADES were synthetized and tested, and the hydrophobic combination of choline chloride and 2,3-butanediol (1:4 molar ratio) yielded the highest extraction efficiency. Its supramolecular structure was confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, with nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) effects. Key extraction parameters, NADES type and volume, extraction time, and agitation, were optimised. Seventeen NPPAs were identified and quantified using ultra-high performance liquid-chromatography coupled to quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap-MS). The method showed low quantification limits (6–300 μg/kg), recoveries between 70.0 and 119.1 %, and precision below 20.0 % at three concentration levels. Total NPPA concentrations ranged from 93.9 to 929.4 μg/kg in roots and from 51.4 to 515.6 μg/kg in leaves. Acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC) and 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone (HCPK) were the most abundant compounds in roots and leaves, respectively. The analytical greenness metric for sample preparation (AGREEprep) metric scored the method at 0.52, outperforming conventional approaches (0.34–0.42) and confirming its greener profile. Estimated daily intake (EDI) were below tolerable daily intake (TDI) thresholds, indicating minimal dietary risk. This study highlights NADES-SLE as a sustainable and reliable approach for monitoring NPPAs in food crops and supports their safer use in plastic production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scp.2025.102138

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For solid and semi-solid samples, DES-assisted UAE, MAE, PLE, and NADES-based solid-liquid extraction offer several advantages compared with traditional microextraction techniques.

    “For solid and semi-solid samples, DES-assisted ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), and NADESbased solid-liquid extraction offer several advantages compared with traditional microextraction techniques [91,93,95,98,103].”
  • NADES-based solid-liquid extraction has emerged as a promising approach for recovery of natural products because NADESs typically exhibit lower toxicity, improved biocompatibility, and greater suitability for food and pharmaceutical applications than many traditional extraction solvents.

    “In addition, NADES-based solid-liquid extraction has emerged as a promising approach for the recovery of natural products because NADESs typically exhibit lower toxicity, improved biocompatibility, and greater suitability for food and pharmaceutical applications than many traditional extraction solvents [91,93,95,98,103].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capilla-Flores, R., Carbonell-Rozas, L., López-Ruíz, R., Garrido Frenich, A., & Romero-González, R.
Affiliations
University of Almería (ES)
Venue
Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-10
Volume
47
Pages
102138
ISSN
2352-5541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412930280
Cited by
5
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositorio de Patentes de la Universidad de Almería (Universidad de Almería) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • State Agency of Research (PID2022\u2013137122OB-I00, FPU21/00858)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
  • Consejería de Transformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
natural deep eutectic solvents, solid-liquid extraction, radish, choline chloride, 2,3-butanediol, food contamination, acetyl tributyl citrate, dietary risk assessment, extraction optimization, green sample preparation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review