CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The lack of social impact considerations in transitioning towards urban circular economies: a scoping review

Vanhuyse, Fedra, Fejzić, Emir, Ddiba, Daniel, Henrysson, Maryna·2021·Sustainable Cities and Society
DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103394
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103394

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Aguilar-Hernandez, 2021, Macroeconomic, social and environmental impacts of a circular economy up to 2050: A meta-analysis of prospective studies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123421 · DOI
  2. Agyeman, 2003, Toward Just Sustainability in Urban Communities: Building Equity Rights with Sustainable Solutions, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 590, 35, 10.1177/0002716203256565 · DOI
  3. Alhawari, 2021, Insights from Circular Economy Literature: A Review of Extant Definitions and Unravelling Paths to Future Research, Sustainability, 13, 1, 10.3390/su13020859 · DOI
  4. Andersson, 2018, Direct and indirect effects of waste management policies on household waste behaviour: The case of Sweden, Waste Management, 76, 19, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.038 · DOI
  5. Banaitė, 2016, Towards circular economy: Analysis of indicators in the context of sustainable development, Social Transformation in Contemporary Society, 4, 142
  6. Bassens, 2020, Placing cities in the circular economy: Neoliberal urbanism or spaces of socio-ecological transition?, Urban Geography, 41, 893, 10.1080/02723638.2020.1788312 · DOI
  7. Becerra, 2020, When Circular Economy Meets Inclusive Development. Insights from Urban Recycling and Rural Water Access in Argentina, Sustainability, 12, 9809, 10.3390/su12239809 · DOI
  8. Bouzguenda, 2019, Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability, Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101627 · DOI
  9. Burneo, 2020, Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Urban Waste Recycling as Part of Circular Economy. The Case of Cuenca (Ecuador), Sustainability, 12, 3406, 10.3390/su12083406 · DOI
  10. Calisto Friant, 2020, A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Camón Luis, 2020, Circular Economy. A Review and Bibliometric Analysis, Sustainability, 12, 6381, 10.3390/su12166381 · DOI
  12. Campbell-Johnston, 2019, City level circular transitions: Barriers and limits in Amsterdam, Utrecht and The Hague, Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1232, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.106 · DOI
  13. Carrière, 2020, Circular cities: The case of Singapore, Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10, 491, 10.1108/BEPAM-12-2019-0137 · DOI
  14. Chateau, J., & Mavroeidi, E. (2020). The jobs potential of a transition towards a resource efficient and circular economy. oecd-ilibrary.org. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/28e768df-en.
  15. Chen, 2021, Clarifying rebound effects of the circular economy in the context of sustainable cities, Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102622 · DOI
  16. Cherry, 2018, Why is ownership an issue? Exploring factors that determine public acceptance of product-service systems, Sustainability (Switzerland), 10
  17. 2015, Circle Scan—Mapping circular opportunities—Circle Economy, Circle Economy
  18. Corona, 2019, Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498 · DOI · Paper page
  19. EESC. (2019, March 6). Workshop 3 SOCIAL DIMENSION OF CIRCULAR ECONOMY – REPORT OF THE WORKSHOP. https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/files/ecesp_2019_workshop_3_social_report_final.pdf.
  20. 2019, The European Green Deal (COM(2019) 640 final), European Commission
  21. Ferronato, 2020, Assessment of municipal solid waste selective collection scenarios with geographic information systems in Bolivia, Waste Management, 102, 919, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.010 · DOI
  22. Geissdoerfer, 2017, The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Geng, 2012, Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: An evaluation and critical analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 23, 216, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.005 · DOI
  24. Girard, 2019, Moving Towards the Circular Economy/City Model: Which Tools for Operationalizing This Model?, Sustainability, 11, 6253, 10.3390/su11226253 · DOI
  25. Girard, 2019, Matera: City of nature, city of culture, city of regeneration. Towards a landscape-based and culture-based urban circular economy, Aestimum, 74, 5
  26. Goldstein, 2017, Just how “wicked” is Beijing's waste problem? A response to “The rise and fall of a ‘waste city’ in the construction of an ‘urban circular economic system’: The changing landscape of waste in Beijing” by Xin Tong and Dongyan Tao, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 117, 177, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.018 · DOI
  27. Govender, K. D. (2017). Circular economy design visioning: Exploring industrial and urban symbiosis in South African cities. [PhD Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal]. http://ukzn-dspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/16957.
  28. Gravagnuolo, A., Angrisano, M., & Fusco Girard, L. (2019). Circular Economy Strategies in Eight Historic Port Cities: Criteria and Indicators Towards a Circular City Assessment Framework. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133512. · DOI
  29. Heurkens, 2020, Circling the square: Governance of the circular economy transition in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27, 11, 10.18778/1231-1952.27.2.02 · DOI
  30. Homrich, 2018, The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways, Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 525, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064 · DOI
  31. Izdebska, 2020, Citizen involvement in waste management and circular economy in cities: Key elements for planning and implementation, European Spatial Research and Policy, 27, 115, 10.18778/1231-1952.27.2.08 · DOI
  32. James, 2016, A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences, Environmental Evidence, 5, 7, 10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kębłowski, 2020, Circular economy and the city: An urban political economy agenda, Culture and Organization, 26, 142, 10.1080/14759551.2020.1718148 · DOI
  34. Knickmeyer, 2020, Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas, Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Korhonen, 2018, Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations, Ecological Economics, 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Koumparou, D. (2017). Circular economy and social sustainability. 5th International Conference of the Hellenic Solid Waste Management Association in Co-Operation with the International Solid Waste Association: Solid Waste Management & Its Contribution to Circular Economy. https://bit.ly/2uahByn.
  37. Kumble, 2019, Reflections on Service Learning for a Circular Economy Project in a Guatemalan Neighborhood, Central America, Sustainability, 11, 4776, 10.3390/su11174776 · DOI
  38. Leipold, 2021, Do we need a ‘circular society’? Competing narratives of the circular economy in the French food sector, Ecological Economics, 187, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107086 · DOI
  39. Lekan, 2020, Digitally enabled diverse economies: Exploring socially inclusive access to the circular economy in the city, Urban Geography, 41, 898, 10.1080/02723638.2020.1796097 · DOI
  40. Liu, 2015, Urban household solid waste generation and collection in Beijing, China, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 31, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.004 · DOI
  41. Marchesi, 2021, Social innovation for a circular economy in social housing, Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102925 · DOI
  42. Merli, 2018, How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
  43. Michelini, 2017, From Linear to Circular Economy: PSS Conducting the Transition, Procedia CIRP, 64, 2, 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.012 · DOI
  44. Miranda, 2020, The Integration of Recycling Cooperatives in the Formal Management of Municipal Solid Waste as a Strategy for the Circular Economy—The Case of Londrina, Brazil, Sustainability, 12, 10513, 10.3390/su122410513 · DOI
  45. Moreau, 2017, Coming Full Circle: Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 497, 10.1111/jiec.12598 · DOI
  46. Nogueira, 2020, Infrastructuring the Circular Economy, Energies, 13, 1805, 10.3390/en13071805 · DOI
  47. OECD. (2019, November). Preparing for the jobs of the future | Regions in Industrial Transition: Policies for People and Places. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/07bfdc43-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/07bfdc43-en.
  48. Padilla-Rivera, 2020, Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review, Sustainability, 12, 7912, 10.3390/su12197912 · DOI
  49. Paiho, 2020, Towards circular cities—Conceptualizing core aspects, Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102143 · DOI
  50. Pauliuk, 2018, Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 81, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019 · DOI
  51. Petit-Boix, 2018, Circular economy in cities: Reviewing how environmental research aligns with local practices, Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1270, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.281 · DOI
  52. Pitkänen, K., Karppinen, T. K. M., Kautto, P., Turunen, S., Judl, J., & Myllymaa, T. (2020). Sex, drugs and the circular economy: The social impacts of the circular economy and how to measure them. In Handbook of the Circular Economy (1st ed., Vol. 1–1). Edward Elgar Publishing. · DOI
  53. Prendeville, 2018, Circular Cities: Mapping Six Cities in Transition, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 171, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Prieto-Sandoval, 2018, Towards a consensus on the circular economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 605, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224 · DOI
  55. Rathore, 2020, Formality and informality in e-waste economies: Exploring caste-class in urban land and labor practices, Urban Geography, 41, 902, 10.1080/02723638.2020.1785745 · DOI
  56. Reike, 2018, The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 246, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027 · DOI
  57. Ruiz-Real, 2018, Worldwide Research on Circular Economy and Environment: A Bibliometric Analysis, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 2699, 10.3390/ijerph15122699 · DOI
  58. Saidani, 2017, How to Assess Product Performance in the Circular Economy? Proposed Requirements for the Design of a Circularity Measurement Framework, Recycling, 2, 6, 10.3390/recycling2010006 · DOI
  59. Samson, D., & Schoelles, K. M. (2012). Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks. In Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews [Internet]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK98235/.
  60. Schroeder, 2019, The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23, 77, 10.1111/jiec.12732 · DOI
  61. Siman, 2020, Governance tools: Improving the circular economy through the promotion of the economic sustainability of waste picker organizations, Waste Management, 105, 148, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.040 · DOI
  62. Soto, C. (2020). Circularity in Cities: Socio-spatial dimension of the circular economy as a step towards climate-sensitive urban planning. [MSc Thesis, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University]. http://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/349332.
  63. Steuer, 2018, Is there a future for the informal recycling sector in urban China?, Detritus, 4, 189
  64. Steuer, 2018, Can Beijing's informal waste recycling sector survive amidst worsening circumstances?, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 59, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.026 · DOI
  65. Suárez-Eiroa, 2019, Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice, In Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 952, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271 · DOI
  66. Suchek, 2021, Innovation and the circular economy: A systematic literature review, Business Strategy and the Environment, 10.1002/bse.2834 · DOI
  67. Tong, 2017, Waste is “wicked” when we try to solve it. Author's response to Joshua Goldstein's comments, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 117, 175, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.019 · DOI
  68. Tong, 2016, The rise and fall of a “waste city” in the construction of an “urban circular economic system”: The changing landscape of waste in Beijing, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 107, 10, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.003 · DOI
  69. Trudeau, 2018, Integrating social equity in sustainable development practice: Institutional commitments and patient capital, Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 601, 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.007 · DOI
  70. Vanclay, 2003, International Principles For Social Impact Assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21, 5, 10.3152/147154603781766491 · DOI
  71. Vanclay, 2015, Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and managing the social impact of projects (p. 107), International Association for Impact Assessment
  72. Veleva, 2017, The need for better measurement and employee engagement to advance a circular economy: Lessons from Biogen's “zero waste” journey, Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 517, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.177 · DOI
  73. Williams, 2019, Circular cities, Urban Studies, 56, 2746, 10.1177/0042098018806133 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Vanhuyse, F., Fejzić, E., Ddiba, D., & Henrysson, M.
Venue
Sustainable Cities and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
75
Pages
103394
ISSN
2210-6707
DOI
10.1016/j.scs.2021.103394
Cited by
103
References
7
Language
en
Licence
Funders
VINNOVA (2019-03237)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review