Cited by 22Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsEpilepsy research and treatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

Psychiatric and personality factors in pediatric functional seizures: A prospective case-control study

Open access
Stager, Lindsay, Morriss, Skylar, Szaflarski, Jerzy P., Fobian, Aaron D.·2022·Seizure

Abstract

Purpose This study assessed psychiatric and personality characteristics in relation to pediatric functional seizures (FS).Methods In a 1:1 prospectively matched-control study design, children with documented FS (confirmed via video EEG; ages 13-18) were matched to controls (MCs) on income, sex, race, and age. Primary outcomes were Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2) and Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory (MACI). Secondary measures included questionnaires assessing trauma, somatization, body awareness and quality of life (QOL). T-tests investigated differences between groups on T-scores. Due to lack of significant outcomes, an experimental analysis was conducted assessing differences in number of clinically elevated BASC-2 and MACI scores between groups. Binary logistic regressions determined the influences of clinically elevated scores on likelihood participants have FS. T-tests assessed differences on secondary measures.Results Participants included 84 children, 42 with FS and 42 MCs (Children with FS: Mean age=15.4, Interquartile Range age=3; 73.5% female; 59.5% white). Children with FS had greater parent-reported somatization (t(23)=5.67, p<0.001) on BASC-2, greater somatization on CSSI-24 (t(35)=6.83, p<0.001), and poorer QOL (t(41)=-6.22; p<0.001) than MCs. There were no differences in clinically elevated BASC-2 or MACI scores compared to MCs and clinically elevated scores did not influence likelihood participants have FS.Conclusions Children with FS had greater somatization and poorer QOL but similar rates of psychiatric symptoms, trauma, and maladaptive personality traits compared to MCs. Psychiatric or personality factors did not predict likelihood of FS. Explanations of pediatric FS should consider novel contributors to FS rather than relying solely on a psychiatric etiology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.04.006

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a different study using the MACI with children with functional seizures (n = 42), no differences between patients and controls were found.

    “In a different study using the MACI with children with functional seizures (n = 42), no differences between patients and controls were found [64].”

    From Illness-Promoting Psychological Processes in Children and Adolescents with Functional Neurological Disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Results report no differences between children with functional seizures and matched controls on MACI self-report subscales. They also specify that the study enrolled 42 children with functional seizures, but the MACI outcome sample was 42 participants total—not 42 children with functional seizures. The quoted sample size is therefore misleading if it refers to those who completed the MACI. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]Kozlowska K, Sawchuk T, Waugh JL, Changing the Culture of Care for Children and Adolescents with Functional Neurological Disorder. Epilepsy & Behavior Reports. 2021: 100486. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100486 PMC8567196 34761194 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [43]Fobian A, Szaflarski JP. Identifying and evaluating novel treatment targets for the development of evidence-based interventions for Functional Neurological Disorder Epilepsy & Behavior Reports. 2021; 16: 100479. 34568805 PMC8449163

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stager, L., Morriss, S., Szaflarski, J. P., & Fobian, A. D.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Fobian, Aaron D.
Venue
Seizure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
98
Pages
105-112
ISSN
1059-1311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224036250
Cited by
22
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seizure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (EP160028)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R61MH127155)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK106570)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
psychiatric comorbidity, personality traits, somatization, quality of life, trauma, maladaptive personality, Behavior Assessment System for Children, Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Seizures, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review