The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separation and recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium ion batteries: Simultaneous recovery of Li and Co in a single step
Abstract
Abstract Sustainable recovery of metals from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) may be of great significance regarding the conservation of metal resources and alleviation of potential risk towards eco-system. Herein an environmentally benign process was proposed for the recovery of high value-added metals (Co and Li) from typical waste cathode materials (LiCoO2) of spent LIBs using mild tartaric acid as both leaching and precipitating reagent. Leaching results indicate that Co and Li can be effectively separated under experimental conditions of reaction temperature- 80 °C, retention time- 30 min, pulp density- 30 mL/g, reducatant dosage- 3 vol% H2O2 and acid concentration- 0.6 mol/L. After leaching, 98% Co and 97% Li can be recovered as precipitate and Li+ enriched solution, respectively. And the leaching of Co and Li fits well to logarithmic rate model, with apparent activation energy of 34.5 and 29.7 KJ/mol, respectively. In addition, characterization results (i.e. FT-IR, SEM-EDS and TGA-DSC) suggest that Co can be directly recovered as relatively pure cobalt tartrate (C4H4O6Co, with a purity of 96.4%) in leaching residues. This whole process can be a sustainable alternative for the simultaneous recovery of Li and Co from waste cathode materials of spent LIBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sun, L., & Qiu, K. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.114 · Cited by 493
Cited by
A novel method for screening deep eutectic solvent to recycle the cathode of Li-ion batteries
Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Lu, Z., & Xu, Z. (2020) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d0gc00701c · Cited by 365
Mao, J., Ye, C., Zhang, S., Xie, F., Zeng, R., Davey, K., Guo, Z., & Qiao, S. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d2ee00162d · Cited by 365
Lithium battery reusing and recycling: A circular economy insight
Pagliaro, M., & Meneguzzo, F. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01866 · Cited by 321
Electrochemical Technologies for Lithium Recovery from Liquid Resources: A Review
Wang, J., Yue, X., Wang, P., Yu, T., Du, X., Hao, X., Abudula, A., & Guan, G. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111813 · Cited by 211
Ding, Y., Nhung, N. T. H., An, J., Chen, H., Liao, L., He, C., Wang, X., & Fujita, T. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16114190 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, X., Kang, D., Cao, L., Li, J., Zhou, T., & Ma, H.
- Venue
- Separation and Purification Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 210
- Pages
- 690-697
- ISSN
- 1383-5866 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889368167
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation and recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium ion batteries: Simultaneous recovery of Li and Co in a single step. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.072
- The paper
- Chen, X., Kang, D., Cao, L., Li, J., Zhou, T., & Ma, H. (2019). Separation and recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium ion batteries: Simultaneous recovery of Li and Co in a single step. Separation and Purification Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
