Cited by 15Philosophy and History of ScienceEthics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Predicting and explaining with machine learning models: Social science as a touchstone

Buchholz, Oliver, Grote, Thomas·2023·Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models recently led to major breakthroughs in predictive tasks in the natural sciences. Yet their benefits for the social sciences are less evident, as even high-profile studies on the prediction of life trajectories have shown to be largely unsuccessful - at least when measured in traditional criteria of scientific success. This paper tries to shed light on this remarkable performance gap. Comparing two social science case studies to a paradigm example from the natural sciences, we argue that, in addition to explanation, prediction is an important goal of social science - and we identify constraints that impede pure ML prediction from being successful in that field. As a remedy, we outline elements of an integrative modelling approach that combines explanatory models and predictive ML models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.10.004

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchholz, O., & Grote, T.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Buchholz, Oliver
Venue
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
102
Pages
60-69
ISSN
0039-3681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388064706
Cited by
15
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4
FWCI
13.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fund for Folk Culture
  • Baden-Württemberg Stiftung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
machine learning, prediction, explanation, predictive success, integrative modeling, explanatory models, philosophy of social science, natural sciences versus social sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review