Cited by 144Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersRestless Legs Syndrome Research

The clinical features of cataplexy: a questionnaire study in narcolepsy patients with and without hypocretin-1 deficiency

Overeem, Sebastiaan, van Nues, Sofie J., van der Zande, Wendy L., Donjacour, Claire E., van Mierlo, Petra, Lammers, Gert Jan·2011·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Background Narcolepsy is often not recognized or accurately diagnosed. This may be due to the fact that cataplexy, a core symptom which is virtually 100% specific, can-in practice-only be diagnosed based on the patient's history. However, the current definition of cataplexy is not very precise and the common distinction between "typical" and "atypical" cataplexy is not well codified.Methods We aimed to provide a detailed description of the phenotypic variability of cataplexy. We included 109 patients with a definite history of cataplexy and a proven hypocretin-1 deficiency. The questionnaire contained 37 items to broadly cover the clinical aspects of cataplexy, including triggers, pattern and duration of muscle weakness, associated aspects such as sensory phenomena, and limitations in daily life due to cataplexy.Results "Laughing" only listed in place 11th of most frequent triggers. "Laughing excitedly" was much more potent, showing that a certain intensity of the emotion is important for a "cataplectogenic" effect. Anger was the highest ranking "non-humorous" trigger, followed by "unexpectedly meeting someone well known." About 60% of patients also had spontaneous cataplectic attacks. Forty-five percent of patients experienced both partial and complete attacks and 30% only partial cataplexy. Fifteen percent of complete attacks were reported to last longer than 2 min. An abrupt return of muscle function was an important feature. The jaw and the face were most often involved in partial attacks, even more than the knee or the leg.Conclusions Cataplexy presents with a large phenotypical diversity, so the current "typical" versus "atypical" distinction may be difficult to hold. We propose that grading cataplexy with different levels of diagnostic confidence may be more useful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.05.010

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cataplexy concerns paresis or paralysis triggered by emotions, usually laughter, but also by a range of other triggers.

    “Cataplexy concerns paresis or paralysis triggered by emotions, usually laughter, but also by a range of other triggers.”
  • Cataplexy is a key feature of narcolepsy; other cardinal symptoms are excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep-onset paralysis, and hypnagogic hallucinations.

    “Cataplexy is a key feature of narcolepsy; other cardinal symptoms are excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep-onset paralysis, and hypnagogic hallucinations.”
  • In cataplexy, patients are conscious even when considered unconscious by eyewitnesses, and there is no amnesia.

    “Patients are conscious even when considered unconscious by eyewitnesses, and there is no amnesia.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Overeem, S., van Nues, S. J., van der Zande, W. L., Donjacour, C. E., van Mierlo, P., & Lammers, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Overeem, Sebastiaan
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
12-18
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070482396
Cited by
144
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
VENI grant from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (916.56.103)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Restless Legs Syndrome Research
Keywords
cataplexy, narcolepsy, muscle weakness, diagnostic confidence, phenotypic variability
MeSH terms
Orexins, Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anger, Cataplexy, Female, Humans, Laughter, Male, Middle Aged, Narcolepsy, Neuropeptides, Phenotype, Surveys and Questionnaires, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review