Cited by 1,126Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

The role of cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin measurement in the diagnosis of narcolepsy and other hypersomnias

Mignot, Emmanuel, Lammers, Gert Jan, Ripley, Beth, Okun, Michele, Nevsimalova, Sonia, Overeem, Sebastiaan, Vankova, Jitka, Black, Jed +4 more·2002·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

CONTEXT: Narcolepsy, a neurological disorder affecting 1 in 2000 individuals, is associated with HLA-DQB1*0602 and low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hypocretin (orexin) levels. OBJECTIVES: To delineate the spectrum of the hypocretin deficiency syndrome and to establish CSF hypocretin-1 measurements as a diagnostic tool for narcolepsy. DESIGN: Diagnosis, HLA-DQ, clinical data, the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), and CSF hypocretin-1 were studied in a case series of patients with sleep disorders from 1999 to 2002. Signal detection analysis was used to determine the CSF hypocretin-1 levels best predictive for International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD)-defined narcolepsy (blinded criterion standard). Clinical and demographic features were compared in narcoleptic subjects with and without low CSF hypocretin-1 levels. SETTING: Sleep disorder and neurology clinics in the United States and Europe, with biological testing performed at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. PARTICIPANTS: There were 274 patients with narcolepsy; hypersomnia; obstructive sleep apnea; restless legs syndrome; insomnia; and atypical hypersomnia cases such as familial cases, narcolepsy without cataplexy or without HLA-DQB1*0602, recurrent hypersomnias, and symptomatic cases (eg, Parkinson disease, depression, Prader-Willi syndrome, Niemann-Pick disease type C). The subject group also included 296 controls (healthy and with neurological disorders). INTERVENTION: Venopuncture for HLA typing, lumbar puncture for CSF analysis, primary diagnosis using the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Stanford Sleep Inventory for evaluation of narcolepsy, and sleep recording studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic threshold for CSF hypocretin-1, HLA-DQB1*0602 positivity, and clinical and polysomnographic features. RESULTS: HLA-DQB1*0602 frequency was increased in narcolepsy with typical cataplexy (93% vs 17% in controls), narcolepsy without cataplexy (56%), and in essential hypersomnia (52%). Hypocretin-1 levels below 110 pg/mL were diagnostic for narcolepsy. Values above 200 pg/mL were considered normal. Most subjects with low levels were HLA-DQB1*0602-positive narcolepsy-cataplexy patients. These patients did not always have abnormal MSLT. Rare subjects without cataplexy, DQB1*0602, and/or with secondary narcolepsy had low levels. Ten subjects with hypersomnia had intermediate levels, 7 with narcolepsy (often HLA negative, of secondary nature, and/or with atypical cataplexy or no cataplexy), and 1 with periodic hypersomnia. Healthy controls and subjects with other sleep disorders all had normal levels. Neurological subjects had generally normal levels (n = 194). Intermediate (n = 30) and low (n = 3) levels were observed in various acute neuropathologic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Narcolepsy-cataplexy with hypocretin deficiency is a genuine disease entity. Measuring CSF hypocretin-1 is a definitive diagnostic test, provided that it is interpreted within the clinical context. It may be most useful in cases with cataplexy and when the MSLT is difficult to interpret (ie, in subjects already treated with psychoactive drugs or with other concurrent sleep disorders).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.59.10.1553

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mignot, E., Lammers, G. J., Ripley, B., Okun, M., Nevsimalova, S., Overeem, S., Vankova, J., Black, J., Harsh, J., Bassetti, C., Schrader, H., & Nishino, S.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Mignot, Emmanuel
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
59
Issue
10
Pages
1553
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967884630
Cited by
1,126
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 56
FWCI
21.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-40041)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-23724, NS 33797)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
narcolepsy, orexin-A, orexin, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, HLA-DQB1*0602, hypersomnia, cataplexy, diagnostic thresholds, multiple sleep latency test, obstructive sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, insomnia, Prader-Willi syndrome, Niemann-Pick disease type C
MeSH terms
Orexins, Adult, Carrier Proteins, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Histocompatibility Testing, HLA-DQ Antigens, Humans, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Middle Aged, Narcolepsy, Neuropeptides, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sympathomimetics, Biomarkers, Polysomnography, Neurotransmitter Agents, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, HLA-DQ beta-Chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review