Cited by 61Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Predictors and patterns of insomnia symptoms in OSA before and after PAP therapy

Glidewell, Robert N., Renn, Brenna N., Roby, Emily, Orr, William C.·2014·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objective Identify factors that predict improvement versus persistence of insomnia symptoms following treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy.Methods Archival data from 68 PAP-treated sleep apnea patients aged 25-83 were analyzed using nonparametric tests and stepwise regression to assess the relationships between insomnia symptoms, multiple OSA variables, and PAP use over time.Results Pretreatment insomnia symptom severity (ISS; b = -0.72, p < 0.001), PAP average use (b = -0.01, p = 0.01) and respiratory disturbance index (RDI; b = -0.02, p = 0.03) predict change in insomnia following PAP therapy. Forty-five percent (24/53) of the subjects with moderate to severe insomnia at pretreatment reported no/mild symptoms after PAP therapy and were considered improved. Improved subjects had lower pretreatment ISS (p < 0.001), higher RDI (p = 0.01), and higher average PAP use (p < 0.035) than subjects with persistent insomnia. Number of medications and comorbidities were similar between improved and persistent groups. New onset of insomnia symptoms occurred in 13% (2/15) of the patients with no/mild pretreatment insomnia.Conclusions Although ISS declines following PAP treatment, 55% of OSA patients have persistent moderate to severe symptoms despite treatment. More severe OSA is linked to higher likelihood of insomnia improvement and the effect of PAP therapy on insomnia may be mediated by OSA severity. Persistent insomnia is unrelated to medication use or comorbidities and may represent an independent, self-sustaining disorder requiring targeted intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.05.001

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glidewell, R. N., Renn, B. N., Roby, E., & Orr, W. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
Glidewell, Robert N.
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
899-905
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027880236
Cited by
61
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, insomnia, positive airway pressure, treatment response, chronic insomnia, OSA severity, respiratory disturbance index, PAP adherence, comorbidities, medication use
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review