Cited by 94Voice and Speech DisordersParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Quantitative assessment of motor speech abnormalities in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder

Rusz, Jan, Hlavnička, Jan, Tykalová, Tereza, Bušková, Jitka, Ulmanová, Olga, Růžička, Evžen, Šonka, Karel·2016·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objective Patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) are at substantial risk for developing Parkinson's disease (PD) or related neurodegenerative disorders. Speech is an important indicator of motor function and movement coordination, and therefore may be an extremely sensitive early marker of changes due to prodromal neurodegeneration.Methods Speech data were acquired from 16 RBD subjects and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. Objective acoustic assessment of 15 speech dimensions representing various phonatory, articulatory, and prosodic deviations was performed. Statistical models were applied to characterise speech disorders in RBD and to estimate sensitivity and specificity in differentiating between RBD and control subjects.Results Some form of speech impairment was revealed in 88% of RBD subjects. Articulatory deficits were the most prominent findings in RBD. In comparison to controls, the RBD group showed significant alterations in irregular alternating motion rates (p = 0.009) and articulatory decay (p = 0.01). The combination of four distinctive speech dimensions, including aperiodicity, irregular alternating motion rates, articulatory decay, and dysfluency, led to 96% sensitivity and 79% specificity in discriminating between RBD and control subjects. Speech impairment was significantly more pronounced in RBD subjects with the motor score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale greater than 4 points when compared to other RBD individuals.Conclusion Simple quantitative speech motor measures may be suitable for the reliable detection of prodromal neurodegeneration in subjects with RBD, and therefore may provide important outcomes for future therapy trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.07.030

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rusz, J., Hlavnička, J., Tykalová, T., Bušková, J., Ulmanová, O., Růžička, E., & Šonka, K.
Affiliations
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Corresponding author
Rusz, Jan
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
19
Pages
141-147
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1431429584
Cited by
94
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (MZ ČR 15-28038A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, speech disorders, speech acoustics, prodromal Parkinson's disease, disfluency, aperiodicity
MeSH terms
Aged, Articulation Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Severity of Illness Index, REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review