Cited by 185Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal outcomes: a national cohort

Open access
Bourjeily, Ghada, Danilack, Valery A., Bublitz, Margaret H., Lipkind, Heather, Muri, Janet, Caldwell, Donna, Tong, Iris, Rosene-Montella, Karen·2017·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objective Pregnancy and the obesity epidemic impacting women of reproductive age appear to predispose women to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in pregnancy. The aim of this study is to examine the association between OSA and adverse maternal outcomes in a national cohort. Methods The National Perinatal Information Center in the US was used to identify women with a delivery discharge diagnosis of OSA from 2010 to 2014. We used the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision to classify OSA diagnosis and maternal outcomes. Results The sample consisted of 1,577,632 gravidas with a rate of OSA of 0.12% (N=1963). There was a significant association between OSA and preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.94–2.54), eclampsia (aOR 2.95, 1.08–8.02) and gestational diabetes (aOR 1.51, 1.34–1.72) after adjusting for a comprehensive list of covariates which includes maternal obesity. OSA status was also associated with a 2.5- to 3.5-fold increase in risk of severe complications such as cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure and hysterectomy. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer (5.1 ± 5.6 vs 3.0 ± 3.0 days, p<0.001) and odds of an admission to an intensive care unit higher (aOR 2.74, 2.36–3.18) in women with OSA. Conclusions Compared to pregnant women without OSA, pregnant women with OSA have a significantly higher risk of pregnancy-specific complications such as gestational hypertensive conditions and gestational diabetes, and rare medical and surgical complications such as cardiomyopathy, pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure and hysterectomy. OSA diagnosis was also associated with a longer hospital stay and significantly increased odds for admission to the intensive care unit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.06.035

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have found increased risks for severe maternal morbidity including eclampsia, cardiomyopathy, pulmonary embolism, and in-hospital mortality.

    “Other studies have found increased risks for severe maternal morbidity including eclampsia, cardiomyopathy, pulmonary embolism, and in-hospital mortality.1008,1009”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1008]

    The Results (page not supplied) report increased risks of eclampsia and cardiomyopathy among pregnant women with OSA. The Discussion says that, unlike this cohort, Louis et al. found a significantly higher risk of pulmonary embolism; the paper does not report increased in-hospital maternal mortality. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bourjeily, G., Danilack, V. A., Bublitz, M. H., Lipkind, H., Muri, J., Caldwell, D., Tong, I., & Rosene-Montella, K.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • National Perinatal Information Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bourjeily, Ghada
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
38
Pages
50-57
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2737467089
Cited by
185
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01HD078515, R01HL130702)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, pregnancy, adverse maternal outcomes, preeclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, hysterectomy, pulmonary edema, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission
MeSH terms
Adult, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Risk Factors, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review