Cited by 78Phytochemicals and Medicinal PlantsSleep and related disordersMedicinal Plant Extracts Effects

A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the effects of ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) extract on sleep quality in healthy adults

Deshpande, Abhijit, Irani, Nushafreen, Balkrishnan, Ratna, Benny, Irin Rosanna·2020·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objective Non-restorative sleep (NRS) affects 10% people worldwide, leading to poor sleep quality, as well as physical and cognitive fatigue. This is the first human study in which an extract of ashwagandha (Withania somnifera Dunal L.) was evaluated for effects in improving overall sleep quality in subjects with NRS.Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 150 healthy subjects scoring high on non-restorative sleep measures were given 120 mg of standardized ashwagandha extract (Shoden®) once daily for six weeks. Subjects were evaluated using the Restorative Sleep Questionnaire-weekly version and World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL) scale. Sleep actigraphy was used to measure the onset of sleep latency, sleep efficiency, total sleep time and wake after sleep onset. Safety of the treatment was determined by testing of vitals, hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis.Results A total of 144 subjects completed the study, with no dropouts due to adverse events. A 72% increase in self-reported sleep quality was found for the treatment group, compared with 29% in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Based on activity monitoring data, the treatment group showed significant improvement in sleep efficiency (SE) (p < 0.01), total sleep time (p < 0.001) and sleep latency (p < 0.01) and wake after sleep onset (WASO) (p < 0.05) versus placebo after six weeks. In the ashwagandha group quality of life (QOL) scores showed significant improvement in physical (p < 0.001), psychological (p < 0.001), and environment domains (p < 0.01).Conclusions Supplementation with the standardized ashwagandha extract for six weeks improved the overall quality of sleep by significantly improving the NRS condition in healthy subjects. No treatment related adverse events were reported in the study.Trial registration Clinical Trials Registry-India (www.ctri.nic.in). Registration number: CTRI/2017/02/007801.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.03.012

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deshpande, A., Irani, N., Balkrishnan, R., & Benny, I. R.
Affiliations
Amala Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Deshpande, Abhijit
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
72
Pages
28-36
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012707869
Cited by
78
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arjuna Natural Private Ltd., Kerala
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
Keywords
Withania somnifera, non-restorative sleep, sleep quality, herbal supplementation, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, total sleep time, quality of life, actigraphy
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Humans, India, Plant Extracts, Quality of Life, Sleep, Withania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review