Cited by 63Sleep and related disordersChild Development and Digital TechnologyCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Sleep duration in preschool children and impact of screen time

Lan, Qiu-Ye, Chan, Kate C., Yu, Kwan N., Chan, Ngan Y., Wing, Yun K., Li, Albert M., Au, Chun T.·2020·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate sleep duration in a representative sample of preschoolers and examine the relationships between screen time and use of different electronic media devices with sleep duration and social jetlag. Methods 2903 preschoolers were included. Parent-completed questionnaire provided information on socioeconomic status, electronic media use of the children and sleep patterns of both parents and children. Preschoolers were divided according to whether they met the international screen time recommendations for their age. Comparisons between the two groups in various sleep measures and effects of different devices on sleep were evaluated. Results 40% of preschoolers in our cohort did not achieve the recommended sleep duration. Subjects who adhered to the screen time recommendations were from families of higher socioeconomic status, had longer sleep duration and better sleep habits. Each hour increase on portable electronic device use was associated with 11 (95%CI: -15 to -6) and 6 (95%CI: -10 to -2) minutes less of average daily sleep duration in boys and girls, respectively. Every additional hour of non-portable electronic devices use was associated with 3 min shift in social jetlag in boys. Presence of electronic devices in bedroom and their use at bedtime increased risk of social jetlag in boys with an OR of 1.40 (95%CI: 1.01 to 1.92) and 1.39 (95%CI: 1.00 to 1.95) respectively. Conclusion A significant proportion of preschoolers does not obtain the recommended am…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.09.024

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lan, Q.-Y., Chan, K. C., Yu, K. N., Chan, N. Y., Wing, Y. K., Li, A. M., & Au, C. T.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Au, Chun T.
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
76
Pages
48-54
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3090521074
Cited by
63
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
from the Research Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (2019.071)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
sleep duration, preschool children, screen time, electronic media use, social jetlag, portable devices, bedtime screen use, socioeconomic status, sleep recommendations, circadian rhythm
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Child, Preschool, Female, Habits, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Jet Lag Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review