Cited by 12Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity, Physical Activity, DietBody Contouring and Surgery

Unveiling the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery: insights from a matched cohort study

Lloyd, S. Julie-Ann, Wall-Wieler, Elizabeth, Liu, Yuki, Zheng, Feibi, LaMasters, Teresa·2025·Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract

Background Obesity is a global health problem with alarming rates of morbidity and mortality. Although bariatric surgery is a proven safe and effective treatment for obesity, only a small fraction of eligible patients utilizes it. Objectives Assess the economic impact of bariatric surgery costs within 2 years of the index date and identify factors associated with cost differences. Setting U.S. national employer-based retrospective claims database. Methods Adults with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kilograms per square meter) were identified in the Merative claims database. Individuals who had a bariatric procedure between January 2017 and December 2019, inclusive, were matched 1:1 with nonsurgical patients, based on age, BMI, sex, comorbidities, and health care costs in the year before the index date. Total and clinical care-specific costs were compared in the 2 years after the index date (excluding the cost of surgery). Results The study included 9432 surgical patients and 9432 well-matched controls. In the 2 years after the index date, follow-up was complete, and total health care costs were $5677 lower among surgical patients (P < .01). In 29 of 35 characteristics examined, health care costs were significantly reduced after surgery. The largest savings were noted among patients with type 2 diabetes ($15,270), steatohepatitis ($11,648), or ages 50-65 years ($11,105). Conclusions Bariatric surgery is associated with an average 22.6% reduction in health care costs within 2 years postindex date. Differences in health care costs varied substantially by baseline demographics, health conditions, and health care usage, highlighting surgery's economic and clinical benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soard.2025.04.004

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lloyd, S. J.-A., Wall-Wieler, E., Liu, Y., Zheng, F., & LaMasters, T.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Intuitive Surgical (United States) (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Lloyd, S. Julie-Ann
Venue
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
987-995
ISSN
1550-7289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409429478
Cited by
12
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Intuitive
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Retrospective Studies, United States, Body Mass Index, Health Care Costs, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review