Cited by 151Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMental Health Treatment and AccessMedication Adherence and Compliance

Willingness to use ADHD treatments: A mixed methods study of perceptions by adolescents, parents, health professionals and teachers

Open access
Bussing, Regina, Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka, Noguchi, Kenji, Mason, Dana, Mayerson, Gillian, Garvan, Cynthia W.·2012·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Little is known about factors that influence willingness to engage in treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). From 2007 to 2008, in the context of a longitudinal study assessing ADHD detection and service use in the United States, we simultaneously elicited ADHD treatment perceptions from four stakeholder groups: adolescents, parents, health care professionals and teachers. We assessed their willingness to use ADHD interventions and views of potential undesirable effects of two pharmacological (short- and long-acting ADHD medications) and three psychosocial (ADHD education, behavior therapy, and counseling) treatments. In multiple regression analysis, willingness was found to be significantly related to respondent type (lower for adolescents than adults), feeling knowledgeable, and considering treatments acceptable and helpful, but not significantly associated with stigma/embarrassment, respondent race, gender and socioeconomic status. Because conceptual models of undesirable effects are underdeveloped, we used grounded theory method to analyze open-ended survey responses to the question: "What other undesirable effects are you concerned about?" We identified general negative treatment perceptions (dislike, burden, perceived ineffectiveness) and specific undesirable effect expectations (physiological and psychological side effects, stigma and future dependence on drugs or therapies) for pharmacological and psychosocial treatments. In summary, findings indicate significant discrepancies between teens' and adults' willingness to use common ADHD interventions, with low teen willingness for any treatments. Results highlight the need to develop better treatment engagement practices for adolescents with ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.009

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Glaser B 1978 Theoretical sensitivity Mill Valley, CA The Sociology Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bussing, R., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Noguchi, K., Mason, D., Mayerson, G., & Garvan, C. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Bussing, Regina
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
92-100
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010120345
Cited by
151
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (RO1MH57399)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD treatment, treatment engagement, adolescents, parents, healthcare workers, teachers, treatment perceptions, ADHD medication, psychosocial interventions, stigma, treatment acceptability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Attitude to Health, Faculty, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review