Cited by 224Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPublic Health Policies and EducationGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Tackling racism as a “wicked” public health problem: Enabling allies in anti-racism praxis

Open access
Came, Heather, Griffith, Derek·2018·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Racism is a "wicked" public health problem that fuels systemic health inequities between population groups in New Zealand, the United States and elsewhere. While literature has examined racism and its effects on health, the work describing how to intervene to address racism in public health is less developed. While the notion of raising awareness of racism through socio-political education is not new, given the way racism has morphed into new narratives in health institutional settings, it has become critical to support allies to make informing efforts to address racism as a fundamental cause of health inequities. In this paper, we make the case for anti-racism praxis as a tool to address inequities in public health, and focus on describing an anti-racism praxis framework to inform the training and support of allies. The limited work on anti-racism rarely articulates the unique challenges or needs of allies or targets of racism, but we seek to help fill that gap. Our anti-racism praxis for allies includes five core elements: reflexive relational praxis, structural power analysis, socio-political education, monitoring and evaluation and systems change approaches. We recognize that racism is a modifiable determinant of health and racial inequities can be eliminated with the necessary political will and a planned system change approach. Anti-racism praxis provides the tools to examine the interconnection and interdependence of cultural and institutional factors as a foundation for examining where and how to intervene to address racism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.028

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bonnett, A. (2000). Anti-racism. London, England: Routledge.
  2. Byrd, W. M., & Clayton, L. A. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare: A background and history. In B. D. Smedley, A. Y. Stith, & A. R. Nelson (Eds.), Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care (pp. 455- 527). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  3. Durie, M., Fitzgerald, E., Kingi, T. K., McKinley, S., & Stevenson, B. (2003). Monitoring Māori progress: Te ngahuru: A Māori outcome framework. Paper presented at the Social Policy Research and Evaluation Conference: Connecting Policy and Practice Wellington, New Zealand.
  4. Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd Expanded ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave
  5. Ramsden, I. (2002). Cultural safety and nursing education in Aotearoa and Te Waipounamu. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis), Palmerston North, New Zealan: Massey University.
  6. Robson, B., & Harris, R. (Eds.). (2007). Hauora: Māori standards of health IV. A study of the years 2000-2005. Wellington, New Zealand: Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare, University of Otago.
  7. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London, England: Penguin.
  8. Watts, R. J., Griffith, D. M., & Abdul-Adil, J. (1999). Sociopolitical development as an antidote for oppression. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 255-271.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Came, H., & Griffith, D.
Affiliations
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Came, Heather
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
199
Pages
181-188
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595397208
Cited by
224
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
32.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
racism, wicked problems, health disparities, systemic racism, allies, monitoring and evaluation, systemic change, racial inequity, public health interventions, New Zealand, United States
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Humans, New Zealand, Public Health, United States, Racial Groups, Health Status Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review