Cited by 128Educational Games and GamificationDigital Games and MediaRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

Connection, meaning, and distraction: A qualitative study of video game play and mental health recovery in veterans treated for mental and/or behavioral health problems

Open access
Colder Carras, Michelle, Kalbarczyk, Anna, Wells, Kurrie, Banks, Jaime, Kowert, Rachel, Gillespie, Colleen, Latkin, Carl·2018·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Rationale Mental and behavioral health recovery includes concepts related not just to symptom improvement, but also to participating in activities that contribute to wellness and a meaningful life. Video game play can relieve stress and provide a way to connect, which may be especially important for military veterans.Objective We examined how military veterans used video game play to further their mental and behavioral health recovery by conducting an exploratory thematic analysis of the gaming habits of 20 United States military veterans who were in treatment for mental or behavioral health problems.Method We conducted semi-structured interviews in 2016 and used a framework analytic approach to determine salient themes linking video gaming to mental and behavioral health recovery.Results Veteran participants reported that video games helped not only with managing moods and stress, but also with three areas related to other aspects of recovery: adaptive coping (e.g. distraction, control, symptom substitution); eudaimonic well-being (confidence, insight, role functioning); and socializing (participation, support, brotherhood). Meaning derived from game narratives and characters, exciting or calming gameplay, and opportunities to connect, talk, and lead others were credited as benefits of gaming. Responses often related closely to military or veteran experiences. At times, excessive use of games led to life problems or feeling addicted, but some veterans with disabilities felt the advantages of extreme play outweighed these problems.Conclusion Video games seem to provide some veterans with a potent form of "personal medicine" that can promote recovery. Although reasons and results of gaming may vary within and among individuals, clinicians may wish to discuss video game play with their patients to help patients optimize their use of games to support recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.044

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inclusion of both clinicians and users in mHealth app development can ensure strategies meet client needs, encouraging wider acceptability and utility and helping clinicians identify evidence-based features.

    “the inclusion of both clinicians and users in their development can both ensure strategies meet the needs of their clients, thus encouraging wider acceptability and utility and helping clinicians better identify evidence-based features [30,57,58].”

    From Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Discussion recommends that experts in relevant fields and gamers themselves help decide what to include in game-based interventions. The Conclusions also advise clinicians to consider designs that foster connection and engagement. Neither passage establishes that including clinicians and users in mHealth app development ensures client needs are met, increases acceptability or utility, or helps clinicians identify evidence-based features. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A collaborative approach to development using both expert and user input has been noted in recent studies as an effective approach to increasing the success of apps.

    “A collaborative approach to development, using both expert and user input, has been noted in recent studies as an effective approach to increasing the success of apps [57,58,60].”

    From Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Discussion recommends that design and health experts, along with gamers, help decide what to consider when creating game-based interventions. It does not report that this collaborative approach increases the success of apps; that effectiveness claim goes beyond the paper's recommendation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hoge CW, 2016 ‘Emerging PTSD Treatment Strategies’, paper presented at Second Annual Service Members & Veterans Conference: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Today and Tomorrow, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, April 18 2016.
  2. Yoder M, 2016 ‘Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Established Treatment Strategies’, paper presented at Second Annual Service Members & Veterans Conference: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Today and Tomorrow, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, April 18 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colder Carras, M., Kalbarczyk, A., Wells, K., Banks, J., Kowert, R., Gillespie, C., & Latkin, C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
216
Pages
124-132
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894472757
Cited by
128
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4
FWCI
20.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5T32MH014592-39)
  • Johns Hopkins Military and Veterans Health Institute
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
video gaming, military veterans, mental health recovery, behavioral health, coping, eudaimonic well-being, social connectedness, game narrative, gaming addiction, disabled veterans, stress reduction
MeSH terms
Mental Health Recovery, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Veterans, Video Games, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review