Cited by 810Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Mindfulness broadens awareness and builds eudaimonic meaning: A process model of mindful positive emotion regulation

Open access
Garland, Eric L., Farb, Norman A., R. Goldin, Philippe, Fredrickson, Barbara L.·2015·Psychological Inquiry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Contemporary scholarship on mindfulness casts it as a form of purely nonevaluative engagement with experience. Yet, traditionally mindfulness was not intended to operate in a vacuum of dispassionate observation, but was seen as facilitative of eudaimonic mental states. In spite of this historical context, modern psychological research has neglected to ask the question of how the practice of mindfulness affects downstream emotion regulatory processes to impact the sense of meaning in life. To fill this lacuna, here we describe the mindfulness-to-meaning theory, from which we derive a novel process model of mindful positive emotion regulation informed by affective science, in which mindfulness is proposed to introduce flexibility in the generation of cognitive appraisals by enhancing interoceptive attention, thereby expanding the scope of cognition to facilitate reappraisal of adversity and savoring of positive experience. This process is proposed to culminate in a deepened capacity for meaning-making and greater engagement with life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1047840x.2015.1064294

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness-based decentering has been linked to greater acceptance, reduced avoidance-oriented responding, and less rigid self-focused appraisal.

    “Mindfulness-based decentering has been linked to greater acceptance, reduced avoidance-oriented responding, and less rigid self-focused appraisal (34, 36, 63).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    In “The role of mindfulness in positive reappraisal,” the paper describes decentering as loosening schematized narratives about the self and enabling more flexible responses. The Conclusion links mindfulness with acceptance of experience. Although “Positive reappraisal as an adaptive cognitive change strategy” contrasts reappraisal with avoidant coping, our copy does not directly establish that decentering reduces avoidance-oriented responding. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness to Manage Moral Injury cultivates metacognitive awareness and attentional broadening-processes empirically associated with decentering and meaning-oriented cognitive-affective reappraisal.

    “Mindfulness to Manage Moral Injury (MMMI), for example, cultivates metacognitive awareness and attentional broadening—processes empirically associated with decentering and meaning-oriented cognitive–affective reappraisal (30, 36, 39, 85).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    In “The role of mindfulness in positive reappraisal” (page not provided), the paper links mindfulness with metacognitive decentering and broader attention. Its neural account describes how widened attention may allow adaptive reappraisal, but it presents this as a proposed process rather than an empirically established link in Mindfulness to Manage Moral Injury. Our copy does not discuss MMMI or show that this specific program cultivates those processes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Self-transcendence is conceptualized as a unifying psychological process, reflected in coordinated changes in self-processing, attention, affect, and meaning, that engages core and proximal moral injury mechanisms-including experiential avoidance, rigid moral appraisals, maladaptive self-referential processing, and negative moral emotions-while potentially supporting downstream moral-existential修复

    “ST is conceptualized as a unifying psychological process, reflected in coordinated changes in self-processing, attention, affect, and meaning, that engages core and proximal MI mechanisms—including experiential avoidance, rigid moral appraisals, maladaptive self-referential processing, and negative moral emotions—while potentially supporting downstream moral–existential repair processes such as”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although self-transcendence has not yet been directly examined as a mediating mechanism, converging evidence of overlapping processes-including decentering, broadened awareness, affective integration, eudaimonic meaning-making, and reappraisal-suggests that self-transcendence may function as a latent therapeutic pathway underlying observed clinical gains.

    “Although ST has not yet been directly examined as a mediating mechanism, converging evidence of overlapping processes—including decentering, broadened awareness, affective integration, eudaimonic meaning-making, and reappraisal—suggests that ST may function as a latent therapeutic pathway underlying observed clinical gains (36, 39).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) links decentering, new appraisals and eudaimonic well-being to positive therapeutic outcomes; the section on mindfulness and positive reappraisal also reports relevant clinical findings. But the paper proposes a mindfulness-to-meaning pathway, not self-transcendence as a latent mediator, and it does not establish that self-transcendence has not been directly examined as one. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reappraisal results in a durable form of positive affectivity and the sense of meaningfulness in life.

    “ultimately 5) resulting in a durable form of positive affectivity and the sense of meaningfulness in life.”

    From Testing the mindfulness-to-meaning theory: Evidence for mindful positive emotion regulation from a reanalysis of longitudinal data (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

    In “Positive Reappraisal Begets Savoring of Pleasant Life Experience” (page unavailable), the paper proposes that reappraisal and savoring may build meaning and, over time, consolidate into sustainable positive affectivity. The claim presents this proposed outcome as a result of reappraisal alone, omitting both the paper’s uncertainty and the role of savoring. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]2. Affleck G, Tennen H. Construing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings. Journal of Personality. 1996; 64(4):899-922. [PubMed: 8956517]
  2. [4]4. Bauer JJ, McAdams DP, Pals JL. Narrative identity and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2008; 9:81-104.
  3. [86]86. King, LA.; Hicks, JA. Positive affect and meaning in life: The intersection of hedonism and eudaimonia. In: Wong, PT., editor. The Human Quest for Meaning. New York: Routledge; 2012. p. 125-142.
  4. [140]140. Williams JMG. Mindfulness and psychological process. Emotion. 2010; 10(1):1-7. [PubMed: 20141295]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garland, E. L., Farb, N. A., R. Goldin, P., & Fredrickson, B. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Garland, Eric L.
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Published
2015-10-02
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
293-314
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
OpenAlex
W2180982102
Cited by
810
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 2
FWCI
51.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R34DA037005)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness, positive emotion regulation, meaning in life, process model, cognitive appraisal, interoceptive attention, cognitive reappraisal, savoring, meaning-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review