Cited by 89Digital Communication and LanguageImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital Communication

U txt WHEN? College students’ social contexts of text messaging

Harrison, Marissa A., Gilmore, Angela L.·2012·The Social Science Journal

Abstract

Highlights► College students use text messaging for favorable and unfavorable social interactions. ► Some uses of text may be considered social breaches. ► Texting may involve disinhibition and inattention to immediate social environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soscij.2012.05.003

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, M. A., & Gilmore, A. L.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Marissa A.
Venue
The Social Science Journal
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
513-518
ISSN
  • 0362-3319 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-5355
OpenAlex
W2072836518
Cited by
89
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Social Science Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
text messaging, university students, social interaction, disinhibition, inattention, mobile communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review