Cited by 188Impact of Technology on AdolescentsRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Exploring the relationships between college students’ cell phone use, personality and leisure

Lepp, Andrew, Li, Jian, Barkley, Jacob E., Salehi-Esfahani, Saba·2015·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.006

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lepp, A., Li, J., Barkley, J. E., & Salehi-Esfahani, S.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lepp, Andrew
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
43
Pages
210-219
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071986174
Cited by
188
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 1
FWCI
44.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kent State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
mobile phone use, university students, leisure experience, personality, Big Five personality traits, extraversion, introversion, boredom, challenges, well-being, smartphone use patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review