The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards sustainable production and consumption: Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations
Abstract
Abstract Environmental degradation has gained significant momentum over the past few decades. Globally, researchers have focused on environmental pollution due to its impact on billions of human lives. With the growing demand for fossil fuels across developing markets, there has been little global consensus on reducing the energy use and carbon emissions. Then again, many countries are making efforts to comply with the Paris Climate Agreement of 2015. Past literature suggests that international trade leads to favorable socioeconomic outcomes, yet some experts believe that international trade causes natural resource scarcity and environmental degradation. The environmental economics literature offers but no empirical studies on the nexus between energy productivity and consumption-based carbon dioxide. This paper has attempted to fill this knowledge gap by analyzing the impact of international trade (imports and exports), eco-innovation, energy productivity, and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions for G7 countries from 1990 to 2018. Data were analyzed using different tests: slope homogeneity and cross-section dependence test; second-generation panel unit root test; Westerlund panel co-integration test; cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lag; augmented mean group; panel causality test. The results suggested that exports, imports, eco-innovation, GDP, renewable energy consumption, and energy productivity are primary factors of consumption-based CO2 emissions in the G7 countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
A rapid and robust method for single cell chromatin accessibility profiling
Chen, X., Miragaia, R. J., Natarajan, K. N., & Teichmann, S. A. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07771-0 · Cited by 1,147
Cited by
Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Murshed, M., Shehzad, K., Akram, R., Cui, L., & Khan, Z. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102881 · Cited by 489
Self-citationKirikkaleli, D., Güngör, H., & Adebayo, T. S. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2945 · Cited by 369
Does digital investment affect carbon efficiency? Spatial effect and mechanism discussion
Xu, Q., Zhong, M., & Cao, M. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154321 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, Q., Khattak, S. I., & Ahmad, M.
- Venue
- Sustainable Production and Consumption
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 254-268
- ISSN
- 2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3116170787
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 52.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards sustainable production and consumption: Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.004
- The paper
- Ding, Q., Khattak, S. I., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Towards sustainable production and consumption: Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. Sustainable Production and Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.