Cited by 219Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio Processing

Class-level spectral features for emotion recognition

Open access
Bitouk, Dmitri, Verma, Ragini, Nenkova, Ani·2010·Speech Communication

Abstract

The most common approaches to automatic emotion recognition rely on utterance level prosodic features. Recent studies have shown that utterance level statistics of segmental spectral features also contain rich information about expressivity and emotion. In our work we introduce a more fine-grained yet robust set of spectral features: statistics of Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients computed over three phoneme type classes of interest-stressed vowels, unstressed vowels and consonants in the utterance. We investigate performance of our features in the task of speaker-independent emotion recognition using two publicly available datasets. Our experimental results clearly indicate that indeed both the richer set of spectral features and the differentiation between phoneme type classes are beneficial for the task. Classification accuracies are consistently higher for our features compared to prosodic or utterance-level spectral features. Combination of our phoneme class features with prosodic features leads to even further improvement. Given the large number of class-level spectral features, we expected feature selection will improve results even further, but none of several selection methods led to clear gains. Further analyses reveal that spectral features computed from consonant regions of the utterance contain more information about emotion than either stressed or unstressed vowel features. We also explore how emotion recognition accuracy depends on utterance length. We show that, while there is no significant dependence for utterance-level prosodic features, accuracy of emotion recognition using class-level spectral features increases with the utterance length.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.010

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automatic emotion recognition based on utterance level prosodic features may play an important role within speaker-independent emotion recognition.

    “Automatic emotion recognition based on utterance level prosodic features may play an important role within speaker-independent emotion recognition [30].”

    From Survey on AI-Based Multimodal Methods for Emotion Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bitouk, D., Verma, R., & Nenkova, A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Bitouk, Dmitri
Venue
Speech Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
52
Issue
7-8
Pages
613-625
ISSN
0167-6393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058819080
Cited by
219
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
18.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Speech Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH073174)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
emotion recognition, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, stressed vowels, unstressed vowels, consonants, speaker-independent emotion recognition, prosodic features, utterance length, feature selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review