Cited by 11Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningEmotion and Mood RecognitionMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Bimodal fusion network with multi-head attention for multimodal sentiment analysis

Open access
Zhang, Rui, Xue, Chengrong, Qi, Qingfu, Lin, Liyuan, Zhang, Jing, Zhang, Lun·2023·Applied Sciences

Abstract

The enrichment of social media expression makes multimodal sentiment analysis a research hotspot. However, modality heterogeneity brings great difficulties to effective cross-modal fusion, especially the modality alignment problem and the uncontrolled vector offset during fusion. In this paper, we propose a bimodal multi-head attention network (BMAN) based on text and audio, which adaptively captures the intramodal utterance features and complex intermodal alignment relationships. Specifically, we first set two independent unimodal encoders to extract the semantic features within each modality. Considering that different modalities deserve different weights, we further built a joint decoder to fuse the audio information into the text representation, based on learnable weights to avoid an unreasonable vector offset. The obtained cross-modal representation is used to improve the sentiment prediction performance. Experiments on both the aligned and unaligned CMU-MOSEI datasets show that our model achieves better performance than multiple baselines, and it has outstanding advantages in solving the problem of cross-modal alignment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app13031915

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scale differences and noise in large-scale unlabeled data can affect alignment accuracy.

    “Other challenges include scale differences and noise in large-scale unlabeled data, which can affect alignment accuracy [178].”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [178]

    The Introduction discusses misalignment between text and audio, and the Results discuss aligning their representations, but neither links alignment accuracy to scale differences or noise in large-scale unlabeled data. The Dataset section describes manually annotated data. Searches for scale differences, noise, and unlabeled data found no passage addressing the claimed causes. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yang, K.; Xu, H.; Gao, K. CM-BERT: Cross-Modal BERT for Text-Audio Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '20), Seattle, WA, USA, 12-16 October 2020; pp. 521-528.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, R., Xue, C., Qi, Q., Lin, L., Zhang, J., & Zhang, L.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Gaussian Robotics Pte. Ltd., Tianjin 200100, China
Corresponding author
Lin, Liyuan
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-02-02
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
1915
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319024667
Cited by
11
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Tianjin Intelligent Manufacturing Special Fund Project-Underwater Heterogeneous Node Communication and Positioning Integrated Ad Hoc Network System Research and Development (20201207, ZDKT2018-006)
  • Tianjin Sino-German University of Applied Sciences Technology Project (20201207, ZDKT2018-006)
  • Tianjin Sino-German University of Applied Sciences Video Image Intelligent Analysis and Processing Technology Innovation Team and Tianjin “131” Innovative Talent Team (20201207, ZDKT2018-006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
multimodal sentiment analysis, cross-modal fusion, multi-head attention, modality alignment, CMU-MOSEI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review