Cited by 40Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

“A challenge” – Healthcare professionals' experiences when meeting women with symptoms that might indicate endometriosis

Grundström, Hanna, Kjølhede, Preben, Berterö, Carina, Alehagen, Siw·2016·Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to identify and describe the experiences of healthcare professionals when meeting women with symptoms that might indicate endometriosis.Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 gynecologists, six general practitioners and nine midwives working at one university hospital, one central hospital, one private gynecology clinic and five healthcare centers in south-east Sweden. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative conventional content analysis.Results Three clusters were identified: the corroborating encounter, the normal variation of menstruation cycles, and the suspicion of endometriosis. The healthcare professionals tried to make a corroborating encounter by acknowledging the woman, taking time to listen, and giving an explanation for the problems. Healthcare professionals had different ways to determine what was normal as regards menstrual pain, ovulation pain and dyspareunia. They also needed to have the competence to act and react when the symptoms indicated endometriosis.Conclusions Meeting women with symptoms that might indicate endometriosis is challenging and demands a certain level of competence from healthcare professionals. Sometimes the symptoms are camouflaged as "normal" menstruation pain, making it hard to satisfy the needs of this patient group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.srhc.2015.11.003

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diagnosing endometriosis, particularly by physicians who are not gynecologists, remains a challenge.

    “However, diagnosing endometriosis, particularly by physicians who are not gynecologists, remains a challenge.[6]”

    From Scar endometriosis presenting as a painful abdominal mass (2020) · cites this paper as [6]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grundström, H., Kjølhede, P., Berterö, C., & Alehagen, S.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Grundström, Hanna
Venue
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
7
Pages
65-69
ISSN
1877-5756 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2193917506
Cited by
40
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
endometriosis, health professionals' experiences, gynecologists, general practitioners, midwives, patient encounters, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, professional competence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Delivery of Health Care, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia, Endometriosis, Female, Gynecology, Humans, Male, Menstruation, Middle Aged, Nurse Midwives, Ovulation, Physicians, Professional Competence, Professional-Patient Relations, Sweden, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review