The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach
Open accessAbstract
Blowouts are among the most undesired and feared accidents during drilling operations. The dynamic nature of blowout accidents, resulting from both rapidly changing physical parameters and time-dependent failure of barriers, necessitates techniques capable of considering time dependencies and changes during the lifetime of a well. The present work is aimed at demonstrating the application of bow-tie and Bayesian network methods in conducting quantitative risk analysis of drilling operations. Considering the former method, fault trees and an event tree are developed for potential accident scenarios, and then combined to build a bow-tie model. In the latter method, first, individual Bayesian networks are developed for the accident scenarios and finally, an object-oriented Bayesian network is constructed by connecting these individual networks. The Bayesian network method provides greater value than the bow-tie model since it can consider common cause failures and conditional dependencies along with performing probability updating and sequential learning using accident precursors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future
Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005 · Cited by 649
Self-citationZio, E. (2018) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.020 · Cited by 401
Kabir, S., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.009 · Cited by 389
Fault Tree Analysis Improvements: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review
Yazdi, M., Mohammadpour, J., Li, H., Huang, H., Zarei, E., Pirbalouti, R. G., & Adumene, S. (2023) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.3271 · Cited by 199
Afzal, F., Yunfei, S., Nazir, M., & Bhatti, S. M. (2021) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-02-2019-0047 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Khakzad, N., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P.
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 108-117
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019509828
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022
- The paper
- Khakzad, N., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P. (2013). Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.