CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of training methods on Distributed Situation Awareness of industrial operators

Nazir, Salman, Sorensen, Linda Johnstone, Øvergård, Kjell Ivar, Manca, Davide·2015·Safety Science
DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Aggarwal, 2006, Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons’ endovascular skills, Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg., 31, 588, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.009 · DOI
  2. Antonovsky, 2013, Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation, Proc. Human Factors Ergon. Soc., 2, 1296
  3. Bouloiz, 2010, Contribution of a systemic modeling approach applied to support risk analysis of a storage unit of chemical products in morocco, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 23, 312, 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.12.001 · DOI
  4. Brambilla, 2011, Recommended features of an industrial accident simulator for the training of operators, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 24, 344, 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.01.009 · DOI
  5. Burkolter, 2010, Comparative study of three training methods for enhancing process control performance: emphasis shift training, situation awareness training, and drill and practice, Comput. Hum. Behav., 26, 976, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.011 · DOI
  6. Cohen, 1992, A power primer, Psychol. Bull., 112, 155, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Coleman, 1994, Industry, school, government cooperate in model training for operators, Tappi J., 77, 113
  8. Damm, 2011, The evaluation of traditional and early driver training with simulated accident scenarios, Hum. Factors, 53, 323, 10.1177/0018720811413765 · DOI
  9. Dekker, 1999, To Intervene or not to Intervene: the dilemma of management by exception, Cognition, Technol. Work, 1, 86, 10.1007/s101110050035 · DOI
  10. Emigholz, 1996, Improving the operators capabilities during abnormal operations; observations from the control house, Process Saf. Prog., 15, 154, 10.1002/prs.680150308 · DOI
  11. Endsley, 1995, Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems, Hum. Factors, 37, 32, 10.1518/001872095779049543 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Helmreich, 1999, The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation, Inter. J. Aviat. Psychol., 9, 19, 10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2 · DOI
  13. Hollnagel, E., 2001. Anticipating failures: what should predictions be about? In the human factor in system reliability – is human performance predictable? In: RTO Meeting Proceedings 32, RTO-MP-32, January, Cedex, France, RTO, NATO.
  14. Hollnagel, 2008, The changing nature of risks, Ergon. Aust., 22, 33
  15. Kluge, 2009, Designing training for process control simulators: a review of empirical findings and common practice, Theor. Issue Ergon. Sci., 10, 489, 10.1080/14639220902982192 · DOI
  16. Lele, 2013, Virtual reality and its military utility, J. Ambient Intel. Humanized Comput., 4, 17, 10.1007/s12652-011-0052-4 · DOI
  17. Manca, 2013, Bridging between virtual reality and accident simulation for training of process-industry operators, Adv. Eng. Softw., 55, 1, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.09.002 · DOI
  18. Manca, 2012, Performance indicators for the assessment of industrial operators, Comput. Aided Chem. Eng., 30, 1422, 10.1016/B978-0-444-59520-1.50143-3 · DOI
  19. Nazir, 2014, How distributed situation awareness influences process safety, Chem. Eng. Trans., 36, 409
  20. Nazir, 2014, Automation in process industry: cure or curse? how can training improve operator’s performance, Comput. Aided Chem. Eng., 33, 889, 10.1016/B978-0-444-63456-6.50149-6 · DOI
  21. Nazir, 2012, Virtual reality and augmented-virtual reality as tools to train industrial operators, Comput Aided Chem. Eng., 30, 1397, 10.1016/B978-0-444-59520-1.50138-X · DOI
  22. Nazir, 2013, Minimizing the risk in the process industry by using a plant simulator: a novel approach, Chem. Eng. Trans., 32, 109
  23. Pariyani, 2010, Incidents investigation and dynamic analysis of large alarm databases in chemical plants: a fluidized-catalytic-cracking unit case study, Ind. Chem. Eng. Res., 49, 8062, 10.1021/ie9019648 · DOI
  24. Patrick, 2010, Approaches to understanding, analysing and developing situation awareness, Theor. Issue Ergon. Sci., 11, 41, 10.1080/14639220903009946 · DOI
  25. Peniche, A., Diaz, C., Trefftz, H., Paramo, G., 2011. An immersive virtual reality training system for mechanical assembly, pp. 109–113.
  26. Rizzo, 2004, The challenge of using virtual reality in telerehabilitation, Telemed. J. E-Health, 10, 184, 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.184 · DOI
  27. Rupasinghe, 2011, Virtual reality training integrated curriculum: an aircraft maintenance technology (AMT) education perspective, Inter. J. Eng. Educ., 27, 778
  28. Salas, 2001, The science of training: a decade of progress, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52, 471, 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Salmon, 2008, Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: a case study in the energy distribution domain, Ergonomics, 51, 367, 10.1080/00140130701636512 · DOI
  30. Saus, 2010, Perceived learning outcome: the relationship between experience, realism and situation awareness during simulator training, Inter. Marit. Health, 61, 258
  31. Sorensen, 2013, Y is best: how distributed situational awareness is mediated by organizational structure and correlated with task success, Saf. Sci., 56, 72, 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.026 · DOI
  32. Sorensen, 2011, Is SA shared or distributed in team work? an exploratory study in an intelligence analysis task, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 41, 677, 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.001 · DOI
  33. Sorensen, 2011, Back to SA school: contrasting three approaches to situation awareness in the cockpit, Theor. Issue Ergon. Sci., 12, 451, 10.1080/1463922X.2010.491874 · DOI
  34. Stanton, 1996, A systems approach to human error identification, Saf. Sci., 22, 215, 10.1016/0925-7535(96)00016-1 · DOI
  35. Stanton, 2001, Situational awareness and safety, Saf. Sci., 39, 189, 10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00010-8 · DOI
  36. Stanton, 2006, Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology, Ergonomics, 49, 1288, 10.1080/00140130600612762 · DOI
  37. Stout, 1998, What do we know about training situational awareness?, vol. 2, 1371
  38. Wilson, 2007, Group learning, Acad. Manag. Rev., 32, 1041, 10.5465/AMR.2007.26585724 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nazir, S., Sorensen, L. J., Øvergård, K. I., & Manca, D.
ORCID
Manca, Davide
Venue
Safety Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
73
Pages
136-145
ISSN
0925-7535
DOI
10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.015
Cited by
56
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review