Cited by 1,840Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsEducational Games and GamificationOnline and Blended Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments?

Open access
Dalgarno, Barney, Lee, Mark J. W.·2010·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

This article explores the potential learning benefits of three‐dimensional (3‐D) virtual learning environments (VLEs). Drawing on published research spanning two decades, it identifies a set of unique characteristics of 3‐D VLEs, which includes aspects of their representational fidelity and aspects of the learner–computer interactivity they facilitate. A review of applications of 3‐D VLEs is presented, leading to the identification of a series of learning affordances of such environments. These affordances include the facilitation of tasks that lead to enhanced spatial knowledge representation, greater opportunities for experiential learning, increased motivation/engagement, improved contextualisation of learning and richer/more effective collaborative learning as compared to tasks made possible by 2‐D alternatives. The authors contend that the continued development of and investment in 3‐D games, simulations and virtual worlds for educational purposes should be considered contingent on further investigation into the precise relationships between the unique characteristics of 3‐D VLEs and their potential learning benefits. To this end, they conclude by proposing an agenda or ‘roadmap’ for future research that encompasses empirical studies aimed at exploring these relationships, as well as those aimed at deriving principles and guidelines to inform the design, development and use of 3‐D virtual environments for learning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Alberti M., 1998, Proceedings of the World Conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (EDMEDIA'98), 104
  2. Bronack S. C., 2005, Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference (SITE'05), 2166
  3. Buchanan K., 2003, Opportunity knocking: co‐opting and games, ALT-N, 43, 10
  4. Jacobson M. J., 2006, Empirical research into learning in 3D virtual and game environments: selected review of the literature [working paper
  5. Jonassen D. H., 1994, Thinking technology, Educational Technology, 34, 34
  6. Jonassen D. H., 1999, Instructional‐design theories and models: Vol. 2. A new paradigm of instructional theory, 215
  7. Kontogeorgiou A. M., 2008, Being inside the quantum atom, PsychNology, 6, 83
  8. Mitchell A., 2005, The use of computer and video games for learning: a review of the literature
  9. Sandford R.(2006).Teaching with COTS. Paper presented at the JISC Online Conference: innovating e‐learning practice March 30.
  10. Squire K., 2004, Embracing diversity in the learning sciences: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the learning sciences (ICLS'04), 513
  11. Steinkuehler C. A., 2004, Embracing diversity in the learning sciences: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the learning sciences (ICLS'04), 521
  12. Whitelock D., 1996, Proceedings of the European Conference on artificial intelligence in education (EuroAIE), 136
  13. Wright W., 1989, SimCity
  14. Yeh A., 2004, Proceedings of World Conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (EDMEDIA'04), 2183

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W.
Affiliations
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lee, Mark J. W.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-20
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
10-32
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2114058809
Cited by
1,840
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 119 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 154 · 2022: 143 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 140 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 70
FWCI
71.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Johnson and Johnson
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
learning affordances, representational fidelity, spatial knowledge representation, experiential learning, contextual learning, cooperative learning, game-based learning, educational simulation, virtual worlds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review