Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches
Open accessAbstract
Gene therapy has long held promise to correct a variety of human diseases and defects. Discovery of the Clustered Regularly-Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR), the mechanism of the CRISPR-based prokaryotic adaptive immune system (CRISPR-associated system, Cas), and its repurposing into a potent gene editing tool has revolutionized the field of molecular biology and generated excitement for new and improved gene therapies. Additionally, the simplicity and flexibility of the CRISPR/Cas9 site-specific nuclease system has led to its widespread use in many biological research areas including development of model cell lines, discovering mechanisms of disease, identifying disease targets, development of transgene animals and plants, and transcriptional modulation. In this review, we present the brief history and basic mechanisms of the CRISPR/Cas9 system and its predecessors (ZFNs and TALENs), lessons learned from past human gene therapy efforts, and recent modifications of CRISPR/Cas9 to provide functions beyond gene editing. We introduce several factors that influence CRISPR/Cas9 efficacy which must be addressed before effective in vivo human gene therapy can be realized. The focus then turns to the most difficult barrier to potential in vivo use of CRISPR/Cas9, delivery. We detail the various cargos and delivery vehicles reported for CRISPR/Cas9, including physical delivery methods (e.g. microinjection; electroporation), viral delivery methods (e.g. adeno-associated virus (AAV); full-sized adenovirus and lentivirus), and non-viral delivery methods (e.g. liposomes; polyplexes; gold particles), and discuss their relative merits. We also examine several technologies that, while not currently reported for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, appear to have promise in this field. The therapeutic potential of CRISPR/Cas9 is vast and will only increase as the technology and its delivery improves.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review summarizes CRISPR/Cas9 biology, modifications beyond gene editing, factors affecting efficacy, and delivery vehicles for in vivo gene therapy, concluding that delivery is the greatest obstacle. It surveys physical, viral, non-viral, and emerging delivery approaches and their relative merits.
Key findings
- CRISPR/Cas9 is a two-component RNA-guided nuclease that has been repurposed beyond editing, including CRISPRi, CRISPRa, base editing of A•T to G•C at ~50% efficiency with few undesired mutations in human cells, epigenetic modulation, inducible systems, CASFISH, and RNA targeting.
- Delivery remains the greatest obstacle; cargo options are DNA plasmid, Cas9 mRNA plus sgRNA, or Cas9:sgRNA ribonucleoprotein (RNP), with RNP generally giving the best editing and minimal off-target effects. Reported efficiencies include microinjection approaching 100%, DNA nanoclew ~36% versus 5% for bare Cas9:sgRNA plus PEI, gold nanoparticles ~30%, iTOP ~70% knockout, and lipid nanoparticles ~70% in vitro after lipid screening.
- Viral vector capacities differ: AAV ~4.5–5 kb, adenovirus 8 kb, and lentivirus ~10 kb up to 18 kb; AAV is ~20 nm while lentivirus/adenovirus are ~80–100 nm. Viral vectors are common for in vivo work but carry immunogenicity and integration risks.
- Efficacy factors include HDR versus NHEJ repair (in mice, HDR 0.5–20% and NHEJ 20–60%), Scr7 increasing HDR up to 19-fold, low Cas9 turnover of ~0.3–1.0 min−1, and persistent off-target cutting. Early gene therapy tragedies were delivery-related: in the SCID-X1 trial 17 were cured, five developed T-cell leukemia, and one died; an OTC patient died from an adenovirus vector inflammatory response.
Methods
- Narrative review with no primary experiments; it synthesizes published literature on CRISPR/Cas9 history, mechanism, modifications, efficacy factors, and delivery.
- Includes Table 1 comparing delivery vehicles by composition, common cargo, capacity, advantages, limitations, ease of use, and references, and discusses selected preclinical studies.
- Main analysis is qualitative synthesis; no systematic search, meta-analysis, or new data are reported.
Limitations
- Stated: delivery remains the greatest obstacle and no all-purpose method has emerged; off-target effects and poor understanding of them remain; safety and long-term toxicity of nanoparticle components have limited information; many emerging technologies are not yet proven with CRISPR.
- Stated: some methods are in vitro/ex vivo only (microinjection and electroporation generally; hydrodynamic delivery is not being considered clinically due to trauma; CPPs are not generally used in vivo); viral vectors elicit immune responses and cannot completely eliminate integration risk.
- Evident: as a narrative review, it lacks systematic search/meta-analysis and primary data; Table 1 ease-of-use is explicitly described as subjective.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 138 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationcitation
Both early gene therapy tragedies stemmed from the therapeutic delivery method.
“It is important to note that both tragedies stemmed from the therapeutic delivery method (LaFountaine et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites LaFountaine et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Delivery is the most difficult barrier to potential in vivo use of CRISPR/Cas9.
“The focus then turns to the most difficult barrier to potential in vivo use of CRISPR/Cas9, delivery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Effective in vivo human gene therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 is achievable once the factors influencing efficacy and delivery are addressed.
- Premisereasoning
Use of site-specific nucleases and NHEJ or HDR generally results in one of four gene editing products: gene knockout, deletion, correction, or addition.
“The use of site-specific nucleases and NHEJ or HDR generally results in one of four gene editing products. Shown in Figure 2, these include gene knockout, deletion, correction, or addition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Type II CRISPR systems require only one protein, Cas9, to scan, bind and cleave the target DNA sequence.
“Type II CRISPR systems require only one protein, Cas9, to scan, bind and cleave the target DNA sequence (Makarova et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Makarova et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Several factors influence CRISPR/Cas9 efficacy and must be addressed before effective in vivo human gene therapy can be realized.
“We introduce several factors that influence CRISPR/Cas9 efficacy which must be addressed before effective in vivo human gene therapy can be realized.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Effective in vivo human gene therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 is achievable once the factors influencing efficacy and delivery are addressed.
- Interpretationcitation
Gene therapy may greatly benefit from CRISPR/Cas9 technology.
“Gene therapy may greatly benefit from CRISPR/Cas9 technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cox et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Effective in vivo human gene therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 is achievable once the factors influencing efficacy and delivery are addressed.
- Premisecitation
In the SCID X-1 gene therapy trial, 17 of 20 patients were successfully and stably cured.
“Of the 20 patents participating in the trial, 17 were successfully and stably cured (Cavazzana et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cavazzana et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The incidence of HDR for double-stranded break repair is extremely low compared with NHEJ, at least where both pathways are equally available.
“In general, the incidence of HDR for DSB repair is extremely low compared with NHEJ, at least in instances where both pathways are equally available to an organism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
An 18-year-old male with partial OTC deficiency died after developing a massive inflammatory response to an adenovirus vector four hours after treatment.
“In another tragedy, an 18-year-old male suffering from a partial deficiency of ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) died after developing a massive inflammatory response to the genetic cargo delivery vehicle, an adenovirus vector, four hours after receiving the treatment (Marshall, 1999; Authors, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Marshall, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Authors, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Base editing using dCas9-adenosine deaminase converts A•T base pairs to G•C base pairs at efficiencies around 50% with few undesired mutations in human cells.
“Using a seventh-generation evolved transfer RNA adenosine deaminase attached to dCas9, researchers demonstrated conversion of A*T base pairs to G*C base pairs in a targeted fashion at efficiencies of around 50% with few undesired mutations in human cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gaudelli et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Excessive sgRNA increases off-target effects.
“However, excessive sgRNA was also shown to increase off-target effects (Fu et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fu et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
There are three commonly reported CRISPR/Cas9 cargo approaches: DNA plasmid encoding both Cas9 and guide RNA, mRNA for Cas9 translation alongside a separate guide RNA, and Cas9 protein with guide RNA (RNP).
“Regarding CRISPR/Cas9 cargoes, there are three approaches that are commonly reported: (1) DNA plasmid encoding both the Cas9 protein and the guide RNA, (2) mRNA for Cas9 translation alongside a separate guide RNA, and (3) Cas9 protein with guide RNA (ribonucleoprotein complex).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Adding a 32 amino acid spacer between the NLS and Cas9 increases DNA cleavage activity.
“Increasing access to the NLS by adding a 32 amino acid spacer between the NLS and Cas9 was shown to increase DNA cleavage activity (Shen et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shen et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CRISPR/Cas9 can target any approximately 23-bp sequence that contains a PAM motif on either strand of DNA.
“A powerful advantage of the CRISPR/Cas9 system is the ability to target any ∼23-bp sequence that contains a PAM motif on either strand of DNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramakrishna et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several Cas9 proteins from differing species have been identified and used for gene editing, including Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9), Neisseria meningitidis (NmCas9), and S. thermophiles (St1Cas9).
“Several Cas9 proteins from differing species have been identified and used for gene editing, including Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9) (Ran et al., 2013), Neisseria meningitidis (NmCas9) (Hou et al., 2013), and S. thermophiles (St1Cas9) (Kleinstiver et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ran et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hou et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kleinstiver et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Directed evolution and structure-guided rational design have allowed engineering of Cas9 variants with altered PAM specificity, including VGR, EQR, and VRER variants with PAMs 5′-NGAN-3′, 5′-NGAG-3′, and 5′-NGCG-3′.
“Additionally, directed evolution and structure-guided rational design has allowed for engineering of Cas9 variants with altered PAM sequence specificity (Kleinstiver et al., 2015; Anders et al., 2016; Hirano et al., 2016). As examples, the VGR, EQR, and VRER variants of SpCas9 have PAM sequences of 5′-NGAN-3′, 5′-NGAG-3′, and 5′-NGCG-3′, respectively, further reducing limits on genome target sele”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kleinstiver et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Anders et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hirano et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cas9 mutants have been designed to reduce non-specific DNA contacts by weakening binding of the target or non-target DNA strand while maintaining robust on-target cleavage.
“Cas9 mutants have also been designed to reduce non-specific DNA contacts by weakening binding of the target DNA strand (Kleinstiver et al., 2016) or the non-target DNA strand (Slaymaker et al., 2016) to Cas9 while maintaining robust on-target cleavage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kleinstiver et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Slaymaker et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Even in the presence of donor template DNA, NHEJ is the more frequent repair mechanism observed from CRISPR/Cas9 editing.
“Even in the presence of donor template DNA, NHEJ is the more frequent repair mechanism observed from CRISPR/Cas9 editing (Maruyama et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maruyama et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Increasing the relative concentration of sgRNA to Cas9 increases on-target cutting activity.
“Increasing the relative concentration of sgRNA to Cas9 protein was also shown in increase on-target cutting activity, presumably by ensuring all Cas9 proteins formed the active ribonucleoprotein complex (Kim et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Use of paired nickase CRISPR/Cas9 in mammalian cells reduced off-target cutting by three orders of magnitude with little to no reduction in on-target cutting efficacy.
“The use of this system in mammalian cells reduced off-target cutting by three orders of magnitude with little to no reduction in on-target cutting efficacy (Mali et al., 2013; Ran et al., 2013; Cho et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mali et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ran et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cho et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Delivery remains the major obstacle for use of CRISPR for in vivo applications.
“As delivery remains the major obstacle for use of CRISPR for in vivo applications, efforts addressing other factors will be briefly summarized here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Effective in vivo human gene therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 is achievable once the factors influencing efficacy and delivery are addressed.
- Interpretationreasoning
The CRISPR/Cas9 system is the most convenient, simple, and flexible tool for site-directed gene editing currently available.
“This simplicity makes the CRISPR/Cas9 system the most convenient, simple, and flexible tool for site-directed gene editing currently available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Target site selection and sgRNA design are not as simple as perhaps originally assumed.
“Reports from several groups, however, have shown that target site selection and sgRNA design are not as simple as perhaps originally assumed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Scr7 and other inhibitors of NHEJ may have toxic effects on host cells.
“While the use of Scr7 and other inhibitors have resulted in increased HDR-mediated gene editing efficiency, these inhibitors may have toxic effects on the host cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Cas9 is less like a catalytic enzyme and more like a single-shot actuator.
“Thus, Cas9 is less like a catalytic enzyme and more like a single-shot actuator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Introducing Cas9 DNA instead of protein makes it more difficult to ascertain precisely how many functional Cas9 units are present at any given timepoint.
“Additionally, considerations for how tightly controlled the overall concentration of Cas9 is must also be made; by introducing Cas9 DNA instead of protein, it becomes more difficult to ascertain precisely how many functional Cas9 units are present in the system at any given timepoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
One cannot guarantee that the viral payload goes to the same precise location every time.
“one cannot guarantee that the viral payload goes to the same precise location every time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Several groups have shown good success with the use of Cas9:sgRNA RNP complexes for lipid nanoparticle delivery.
“However, several groups have shown good success with the use of Cas9:sgRNA RNP complexes (Zuris et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zuris et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
It is rare to see particularly high efficacies when delivering CRISPR/Cas9 components via lipid nanoparticles.
“Because of this, it is rare to see particularly high efficacies when delivery CRISPR/Cas9 components via lipid nanoparticles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
If delivering Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA via lipid nanoparticles, this method is functionally like microinjection in result.
“If delivering Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA, this method is functionally like microinjection in result (Yin et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yin et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Microinjection allows for controlled delivery of known quantities of cargo, improving control over off-target effects.
“This method also allows for the controlled delivery of known quantities of the cargo, improving control over off-target effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
LV delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 has been used to modify up to five genes using a single LV delivering plasmid DNA encoding Cas9, sgRNA and a fluorescent marker to develop a mouse model of acute myeloid leukemia.
“Examples of LV delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 include modification of up to five genes using a single LV to deliver plasmid DNA encoding Cas9, sgRNA and a fluorescent marker to develop a mouse model of acute myeloid leukemia (Heckl et al., 2014)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heckl et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
CRISPR/Cas9 seems to be particularly well-suited to lipid nanoparticle delivery because Cas9 and the sgRNA as a ribonucleoprotein complex are highly anionic.
“CRISPR/Cas9 seems to be particularly well-suited to this type of delivery because Cas9 and the sgRNA as a ribonucleoprotein complex are highly anionic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Genomics screening using CRISPR/Cas9 and LV was used to identify the genes essential for West-Nile-virus-induced cell death.
“genomics screening using CRISPR/Cas9 and LV was used to identify the genes essential for West-Nile-virus-induced cell death (Figure 6(e)) (Ma et al., 2015)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ma et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Microinjection is best suited for in vitro and ex vivo work only, as the use of a microscope to target individual cells precludes its use in a true in vivo setting.
“Naturally, microinjection is best suited for in vitro and ex vivo work only, as the use of a microscope to target individual cells (and precisely inject cargoes to specific locations within them) precludes the use of microinjection in a true in vivo setting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The detection of immune responses to AdV and SpCas9 indicates the importance of studying the immunogenicity of specific Cas9s for in vivo delivery of CRISPR.
“This indicates the importance of also studying the immunogenicity of specific Cas9s for in vivo delivery of CRISPR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AAV only allows for ∼4.5-5 kb of genomic material to be packaged.
“While this is within the realm of technical possibility, the SpCas9 and sgRNA are roughly 4.2kB in size, and the overall size of AAV (∼20 nm) only allows for ∼4.5–5 kb of genomic material to be packaged within it (Wu et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wu et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Shorter Cas9 variants identified to date have longer PAM sequences and thus greater limitations on sequences available for targeting.
“It should be noted, however, that shorter Cas9 variants identified to date have longer PAM sequences and thus greater limitations on sequences available for targeting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Injection of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA into the zygote cytoplasm is the most efficient method for yielding normal embryos and full-term mouse pups harboring the desired modification.
“In addition, there is evidence that injection of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA into the zygote cytoplasm is the most efficient method for yielding normal embryos and full-term mouse pups harboring the desired modification (Horii et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Horii et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
It is not currently possible to completely eliminate the chances of integration into the host for LV or AdV delivery systems.
“it is not currently possible to completely eliminate the chances of integration into the host.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen and Goncalves, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 RNA components into cells results in a finite duration of action owing to the natural decay of mRNA within eukaryotic cells.
“With some exceptions, microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 RNA components into cells results in a finite duration of action of the system, owing to the natural decay of mRNA within eukaryotic cells (Ross, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ross, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Genomics screening using CRISPR/Cas9 and LV was used to define a signal peptide pathway required by flaviviruses.
“and define a signal peptide pathway required by flaviviruses (Zhang et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Electroporation is typically not suitable for in vivo applications owing to the large amounts of voltage needed to be applied across cell membranes.
“Owing to the oftentimes-large amounts of voltage needed to be applied across cell membranes, however, electroporation is typically not suitable for in vivo applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Wang et al. used LV to deliver a pool of 73,000 sgRNAs to two human cell lines that had been previously engineered to express Cas9.
“Wang et al. (2014) used LV to deliver a pool of 73,000 sgRNAs to two human cells lines that had been previously engineered to express Cas9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LV delivery has been used to target herpes simplex virus-1 genome regions essential to viral protein expression during early and late phases of viral infection/reinfection to suppress infection and prevent new infection.
“target of herpes simplex virus-1 genome regions essential to viral protein expression during early and late phases of viral infection/reinfection to suppress infection and prevent new infection (Roehm et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roehm et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Two microinjections into a single cell, even when separated by several hours, typically result in non-viable cells.
“Further, two microinjections, even when separated by several hours, typically results in non-viable cells (Yang et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LV delivery has been used to mutate genes in mouse primary immune cells.
“and the use of LV to mutate genes in mouse primary immune cells (Platt et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Platt et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The LV system has been used to create gene libraries for studying mechanisms of disease.
“Leveraging the integration ability of LV, this system has also been used to create gene libraries for studying mechanisms of disease.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Shalem et al. delivered 64,751 unique sgRNA sequences by LV to human cancer cells.
“Shalem et al. (2014) delivered 64,751 unique sgRNA sequences by LV to human cancer cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shalem et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AdV delivery of Cas9 and sgRNA targeting Pten in mouse liver resulted in massive hepatomegaly and features of NASH four months post treatment.
“Four months post treatment, Pten gene-edited mice showed massive hepatomegaly and features of NASH.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Hydrodynamic delivery can be traumatic, resulting in potential physiological complications including cardiac dysfunction, elevated blood pressure, and liver expansion.
“The process of hydrodynamic delivery can be quite traumatic, resulting in potential physiological complications, including cardiac dysfunction, elevated blood pressure, and liver expansion (Suda et al., 2007; Bonamassa et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Suda et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bonamassa et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Typical AdVs and LVs elicit strong immune responses.
“typical AdVs and LVs elicit strong immune responses (Follenzi et al., 2007; Ahi et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Follenzi et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ahi et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
None of SLO, MENDs, lipid-coated mesoporous silica particles, and inorganic nanoparticles have been demonstrated in the literature for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery.
“While none of these have been demonstrated in the literature for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, their properties make them naturally amenable for use as CRISPR/Cas delivery vehicles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because CPPs are roughly 40-fold more efficient than transfection from bare plasmids, CPPs are a serviceable method for delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components to cells.
“As CPPs are roughly 40-fold more efficient than transfection from bare plasmids, CPPs are a serviceable method for delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components to cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Naked plasmids can achieve tangible long-term effects with an efficiency rate of just 0.4%.
“As shown above, however, naked plasmids can achieve tangible long-term effects with an efficiency rate of just 0.4%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Naked plasmids can achieve tangible long-term effects with an efficiency rate of just 0.4%.
- Premisecitation
Lee et al. (2017) reported use of AuNPs to deliver Cas9:sgRNA RNP to mice suffering from DMD.
“Lee et al. (2017) also reported use of AuNPs to deliver Cas9:sgRNA RNP to mice suffering from DMD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Zuckermann et al. (2015) reported the use of PEI to deliver Cas9- and sgRNA-encoding plasmid DNA into mouse brains to generate a malignant brain tumor model.
“Zuckermann et al. (2015) reported the use of PEI to deliver Cas9- and sgRNA-encoding plasmid DNA into mouse brains to generate a malignant brain tumor model (Figure 7(B)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zuckermann et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ramakrishna et al. (2014) showed separate delivery of CPP-Cas9 and CPP-sgRNA to multiple human cell lines.
“Some work with CPPs and CRISPR/Cas9 was accomplished as early as 2014 by Ramakrishna et al. (2014), who showed separate delivery of CPP–Cas9 and CPP–sgRNA to multiple human cell lines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramakrishna et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lipofectamine has been used to deliver Cas9- and sgRNA-encoding plasmid DNA to human pluripotent stem cells to generate a model for ICF syndrome with 63% transfection efficiency.
“Lipofectamine has been used to deliver Cas9- and sgRNA-encoding plasmid DNA to human pluripotent stem cells to generate a model for Immunodeficiency, Centromeric region instability, Facial anomalies syndrome (ICF) syndrome with 63% transfection efficiency (Horii et al., 2013)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Horii et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lipofectamine has been used to transfect human cells with an all-in-one expression cassette with up to seven sgRNAs and a Cas9 nuclease/nickase.
“transfect human cells with an all-in-one expression cassette with up to seven sgRNAs and a Cas9 nuclease/nickase (Sakuma et al., 2014)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sakuma et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
iTOP was used to deliver CRISPR/Cas9 RNP into primary human KBM7 and H1 cells, conferring diphtheria toxin resistance with approximately 70% gene knockout efficiency.
“iTOP was used to delivery CRISPR/Cas9 RNP into primary human KBM7 and H1 cells, conferring diphtheria toxin resistance with ∼70% gene knockout efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites D'Astolfo et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing components has been reported using other nanocomplexes that generally rely on electrostatic interactions.
“Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing components has been reported using other nanocomplexes that generally rely on electrostatic interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Ebina et al. (2013) used calcium phosphate transfection to deliver plasmid DNA encoding Cas9 and sgRNA into latent HIV-1-infected human 293T cells.
“Ebina et al. (2013) used calcium phosphate transfection to deliver plasmid DNA encoding Cas9 and sgRNA into latent HIV-1-infected human 293 T cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ebina et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Lipid nanoparticles are like virus particles in that the nature and size of the cargo, along with the target cell type, highly affect transfection efficiency and the types of lipids that are appropriate or useful.
“Finally, lipid nanoparticles are like virus particles in that the nature and size of the cargo, along with the target cell type, highly affect transfection efficiency and the types of lipids that are appropriate or useful in the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Liang et al. (2015) showed greater efficiencies for electroporation transfection versus lipofectamine.
“They showed greater efficiencies for electroporation transfection versus lipofectamine”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liang et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lipofectamine has been used to introduce modular AND gate circuits based on CRISPR/Cas9 that detect bladder cancer cells, inhibit bladder cancer cell growth, induce apoptosis, and decrease cell motility.
“introduce modular ‘AND’ gate circuits based on CRISPR/Cas9 that detects bladder cancer cells, inhibits bladder cancer cell growth, induces apoptosis, and decreases cell motility (Liu et al., 2014)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because of the level of detail required for optimization, CPPs are not generally currently utilized to deliver components in vivo.
“Because of the level of detail required for this optimization, CPPs are not generally currently utilized to deliver components in vivo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
As a relatively new delivery technology, the DNA nanoclew has currently only been utilized in an in vitro setting.
“As this is a relatively new delivery technology, it has currently only been utilized in an in vitro setting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Lipofectamine has been used to correct the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductor receptor locus in cultured intestinal stem cells of cystic fibrosis patients.
“correct the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductor receptor locus in cultured intestinal stem cells of cystic fibrosis patients (Schwank et al., 2013)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwank et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PEI was used to deliver CRISPR plasmid DNA to inhibit HBV replication and gene expression in HBV-infected mice.
“PEI was also used to deliver CRISPR plasmid DNA to inhibit HBV replication and gene expression in HBV-infected mice (Zhen et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhen et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Typically, CPPs show low efficiency of the desired targeted mutation in cells, usually around 10-20%.
“Typically, CPPs show low efficiency of the desired targeted mutation in cells – usually around 10–20%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CPPs typically show low efficiency of the desired targeted mutation in cells, usually around 10–20%.
- Premisecitation
By coating the nanoclew with PEI to induce endosomal escape, Sun et al. demonstrated roughly 36% efficiency in delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 RNP with the nanoclew, compared with 5% with bare Cas9:sgRNA and PEI.
“By coating the nanoclew with PEI to induce endosomal escape (Figure 8(A-b)), the group demonstrated roughly 36% efficiency in delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 RNP with the nanoclew (compared with 5% with bare Cas9:sgRNA and PEI).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lipofectamine has been used to deliver Cas9:sgRNA RNP in vivo to modify the hair cells within mouse inner ear.
“and deliver Cas9:sgRNA RNP in vivo to modify the hair cells within mouse inner ear (Zuris et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zuris et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Liang et al. (2015) showed lower off-target effects using RNP over plasmid DNA or mRNA cargo.
“and lower off-target effects using RNP over plasmid DNA or mRNA cargo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liang et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Sun et al. (2015) repurposed the nanoclew for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery by designing the palindromic sequences to be partially complementary to the sgRNA within the Cas9:sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complex.
“In 2015, the group repurposed the nanoclew for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery by designing the palindromic sequences to be partially complementary to the sgRNA within the Cas9:sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complex (Figure 8(A-a)) (Sun et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Instead of an all-purpose method, multiple methods are seen for delivering CRISPR to cells.
“Instead, multiple methods are seen for delivering CRISPR to cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The best gene editing results with minimal off-target effects are generally obtained from delivery of the ribonucleoprotein, as opposed to plasmid DNA or mRNA.
“Further, the best gene editing results with minimal off-target effects are generally obtained from delivery of the ribonucleoprotein, as opposed to plasmid DNA or mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
MENDs are composed of condensed plasmid DNA, a PLL core, and a lipid film shell.
“MENDs, developed by the Harashima group at Hokkaido University, are a non-viral gene editing and therapeutic delivery system that is composed of condensed plasmid DNA, a PLL core, and a lipid film shell (Kogure et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kogure et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lipid-coated mesoporous silica particles are composed of a mesoporous silica nanoparticle core and a lipid membrane shell.
“this biological delivery system is composed of a mesoporous silica nanoparticle core and a lipid membrane shell (Liu et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
MEND has been used to successfully deliver cargoes of plasmid DNA, short interfering RNA, and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin cell wall therapeutic agents.
“MEND has been used to successfully deliver cargoes of plasmid DNA, short interfering RNA (siRNA), and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) cell wall therapeutic agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Addition of the cell-penetrating peptide stearyl octaarginine to the lipid shell increased transfection rates by 1000-fold over bare DNA/PLL.
“Addition of the cell-penetrating peptide stearyl octaarginine to the lipid shell increased transfection rates by 1000-fold over bare DNA/PLL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Walev et al. (2001) developed a system to allow SLO to act in a reversible manner.
“Walev et al. (2001) developed a system in 2001 to allow for this toxin to act in a reversible manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walev et al., 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Pore size, pore chemistry, and overall particle size can be individually tailored, allowing for the loading of various types of cargo.
“In addition, pore size, pore chemistry, and overall particle size can be individually tailored, allowing for the loading of various types of cargo (Du et al., 2014; Durfee et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Du et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Durfee et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Regarding gene cargo delivery systems, this remains the greatest obstacle for CRISPR/Cas9 use.
“Regarding gene cargo delivery systems, this remains the greatest obstacle for CRISPR/Cas9 use, and an all-purpose delivery method has yet to emerge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Our understanding of off-target effects remains poor.
“however, our understanding of off-target effects remains poor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
An all-purpose delivery method for CRISPR/Cas9 has yet to emerge.
“and an all-purpose delivery method has yet to emerge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The silica core has a large internal surface area, leading to high cargo loading capacities.
“The silica core has a large internal surface area, leading to high cargo loading capacities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
CRISPR/Cas9 components, whether in an RNP complex, as mRNA, or as DNA plasmids, are larger than other components that have been reported to load within lipid-coated mesoporous silica particles.
“CRISPR/Cas9 components, whether in an RNP complex, as mRNA, or as DNA plasmids, are larger than other components that have been reported to load within the particles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CRISPR/Cas9 components, whether in an RNP complex, as mRNA, or as DNA plasmids, are larger than other components that have been reported to load within lipid-coated mesoporous silica particles.
- Interpretationnone given
Within the CRISPR/Cas9 system itself, off-target cutting remains a problem.
“Within the system itself, off-target cutting remains a problem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Packaging the DNA/PLL core with lipids increased transfection rates by ten-fold over bare DNA/PLL.
“Packaging the DNA/PLL core with lipids increased transfection rates by ten-fold over bare DNA/PLL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kogure et al., 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lipid-coated mesoporous silica particles have been loaded with a variety of imaging agents, chemotherapeutics, and phototherapy agents for both in vitro and in vivo work.
“To date, lipid-coated mesoporous silica particles have been loaded with a variety of imaging agents, chemotherapeutics, and phototherapy agents for both in vitro and in vivo work (Mackowiak et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Durfee et al., 2016; Su et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mackowiak et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Durfee et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
This allows for the delivery of proteins of up to 100 kDa to the cytosol of both adherent and non-adherent cells in culture without compromising overall viability.
“This allows for the delivery of proteins of up to 100 kDa to the cytosol of both adherent and non-adherent cells in culture without compromising overall viability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walev et al., 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 65
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the SCID X-1 trial, five children subsequently developed T-cell leukemia, with one child dying from chemotherapy-refractory leukemia.
“However, five children subsequently developed T-cell leukemia, with one child dying from chemotherapy-refractory leukemia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNHEJ repairs double-stranded breaks without a homologous DNA template, regularly leading to mutations and deletions, and is error-prone.
“In NHEJ, protein factors re-ligate the broken DNA strand either directly or by including nucleotide insertions or deletions (indels) (Hefferin & Tomkinson, 2005). This process occurs without a homologous DNA template, regularly leading to mutations and deletions in the repaired strand (Bibikova et al., 2002), as shown in Figure 1(A). NHEJ is, therefore, characterized as error-prone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hefferin & Tomkinson, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bibikova et al., 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDiscovery of CRISPR, its function as an adaptive prokaryotic immune system, and its development into a genomic editing tool has revolutionized molecular biology.
“Discovery of the Clustered Regularly-Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) (Ishino et al., 1987; Mojica et al., 1993; van Soolingen et al., 1993), their function as part of an adaptive prokaryotic immune system (CRISPR-associated system, Cas) (Bolotin et al., 2005; Mojica et al., 2005; Pourcel et al., 2005; van der Oost et al., 2009), and subsequent development into a genomic editing tool”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ishino et al., 1987
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jinek et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mali et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTALENs are substantially larger than ZFNs, requiring 3 kb of cDNA per TALEN versus 1 kb per ZFN, making delivery of a pair of TALENs more challenging due to cargo size limitations.
“TALENs, however, are substantially larger than ZFNs, requiring 3 kb of cDNA encoding for one TALEN versus just 1 kb for a single ZFN. This makes delivery of a pair of TALENs more challenging than a pair of ZFNs due to delivery vehicle cargo size limitations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCRISPR/Cas9 avoids the need for protein engineering to target a specific DNA sequence, requiring only synthesis of new RNA, which simplifies and reduces the time needed for gene editing design and implementation.
“The use of CRISPR/Cas9 avoids the need for protein engineering to develop a site-specific nuclease against a specific DNA target sequence, requiring only the synthesis of a new piece of RNA. This dramatically simplifies and greatly reduces the time needed for gene editing design and implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSingle mismatches, and sometimes multiple mismatches, can be tolerated by the Cas9:RNA complex, with mismatches more tolerated downstream of the seed region.
“Single mismatches, and sometimes multiple mismatches, can be tolerated by the Cas9:RNA complex, with mismatches being more tolerated in regions downstream of the seed region (Cong et al., 2013; Sternberg et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cong et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sternberg et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTALEN design and engineering is simpler and faster than ZFNs, and TALENs are less limited in target site selection.
“Unlike ZFNs, design and engineering of TALENs is much simpler and can be done in a shorter time (Cermak et al., 2011; Reyon et al., 2012). TALENs are also not as limited as ZFNs in target site selection due to the 1:1 TALE–DNA binding (Zhu et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cermak et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reyon et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhu et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOver 3000 genes have been associated with disease-causing mutations.
“To date, over 3000 genes have been associated with disease-causing mutations (Cox et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cox et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn all cases of leukemia in the SCID X-1 trial, the correcting gene inserted within or near tumor-promoting genes and caused transcriptional activation.
“In all cases of leukemia, the SCID X-1 correcting gene had inserted into the patient genome within or near tumor-promoting genes and caused transcriptional activation (Check, 2002; Kaiser, 2003; Thomas et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Check, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kaiser, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thomas et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHDR uses a homologous repair template to precisely repair double-stranded breaks and typically occurs in late S- or G2-phase.
“In contrast, HDR uses a homologous repair template to precisely repair the DSB (Capecchi, 1989; Takata et al., 1998) (see Figure 1(B)). HDR typically occurs in late S- or G2-phase, when a sister chromatid can serve as the repair template.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Capecchi, 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Takata et al., 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe simplicity and flexibility of the CRISPR/Cas9 site-specific nuclease system has led to its widespread use in many biological research areas, including development of model cell lines, discovering mechanisms of disease, identifying disease targets, development of transgene animals and plants, and transcriptional modulation.
“Additionally, the simplicity and flexibility of the CRISPR/Cas9 site-specific nuclease system has led to its widespread use in many biological research areas including development of model cell lines, discovering mechanisms of disease, identifying disease targets, development of transgene animals and plants, and transcriptional modulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Cas9:RNA complex randomly interrogates DNA, searches for a PAM, unwinds the seed region, and cleaves the target and non-target DNA strands via its HNH and RuvC domains.
“The Cas9:RNA complex randomly interrogates DNA in the cell, searching first for the appropriate protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), a short motif (5′-NGG-3′ for Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes) adjacent to the target sequence (Chylinski et al., 2013).”
- Also stated in: § Biological mechanism of CRISPR · plain
“If the interrogated DNA sequence matches the crRNA target sequence, the HNH nuclease domain of the Cas9 nuclease lobe cleaves the target strand while the RuvC-like nuclease domain of the Cas9 α-helical lobe cleaves the non-target strand (Anders et al., 2014; Jinek et al., 2014; Nishimasu et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chylinski et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Anders et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jinek et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Biological mechanism of CRISPR · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationZFNs are a fusion protein of Cys2-His2 zinc finger proteins and a non-specific FokI endonuclease.
“ZFNs are a fusion protein of Cys2-His2 zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) and a non-specific DNA restriction enzyme derived from FokI endonucleases, as shown in Figure 3(A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bibikova et al., 2002, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn one side-by-side comparison study, TALENs were more specific and less cytotoxic than ZFNs.
“While off-target cutting remains a concern, TALENs have been shown in one side-by-side comparison study to be more specific and less cytotoxic than ZFNs (Mussolino et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mussolino et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChallenges with ZFNs include design and engineering of the zinc finger protein for high-affinity binding, limited target site selection, and off-target cutting.
“Challenges with ZFNs include design and engineering of the ZFP for high-affinity binding of the desired sequence, which can prove non-trivial (Ramirez et al., 2008). Also, not all sequences are available for ZFP binding, so site selection is limited. Using open-source ZFP domains, sites could be targeted only every 200-bps in a random DNA sequence (Gupta & Musunuru, 2014).”
- Also stated in: § Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) · plain
“Another significant challenge is off-target cutting (Gabriel et al., 2011; Pattanayak et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ramirez et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gupta & Musunuru, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gabriel et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCRISPR/Cas9 is a naturally occurring RNA-guided endonuclease.
“The most recently developed site-specific gene editing tool, CRISPR/Cas9, is a naturally occurring RNA-guided endonuclease.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenVehicles used to deliver CRISPR cargo can be classified into three general groups: physical delivery, viral vectors, and non-viral vectors.
“Vehicles used to deliver the gene editing system cargo (Table 1) can be classified into three general groups: physical delivery, viral vectors, and non-viral vectors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe dCas9-FokI nuclease dimer system increases specificity and reduces off-target cutting, but the number of potential target sites is lower due to PAM and sgRNA design constraints, and it significantly increases the size of the gene editing tool, constraining in vivo delivery.
“While these approaches increase specificity and reduce off-target cutting, the number of potential target sites is lower due to PAM and other sgRNA design constraints. This system also significantly increased the size of the gene editing tool, providing greater constraints on in vivo delivery approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Guilinger et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tsai et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEspecially for in vivo work, viral vectors are the most common CRISPR/Cas9 delivery vectors.
“Especially for in vivo work, viral vectors have found favor and are the most common CRISPR/Cas9 delivery vectors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCas9 subtypes II-A and II-C can recognize and cleave RNA in a directed manner independent of a PAM site, and this cleavage protected E. coli from MS2 bacteriophage, suggesting Cas9 can provide cellular defense against both DNA and RNA viruses.
“Strutt and colleagues demonstrated that Cas9 subtypes II-A and II-C can recognize and cleave RNA in a directed manner utilizing RNA–RNA interactions independent of the presence of a PAM site in the target RNA molecule (Strutt et al., 2018). This cleavage protected E. coli cells from infection with bacteriophage MS2 particles, suggesting that Cas9 can provide cellular defense against both DNA and R”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Strutt et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCas9 has low activity compared with other enzymes, with a single turnover rate of ∼0.3-1.0 min−1.
“Finally, in comparison with other enzymes, the activity of Cas9 is quite low, with a single turnover rate of ∼0.3–1.0 min−1(Jinek et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jinek et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe delivery vehicle used often dictates which of the three cargos can be packaged and whether the system is usable in vitro and/or in vivo.
“The delivery vehicle used will often dictate which of these three cargos can be packaged, and whether the system is usable in vitro and/or in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHaeussler et al. (2016) compared predictions from several sgRNA design tools with experimental results from eight SpCas9 off-target studies and showed evidence of algorithmic overfitting and the importance of using a model trained on data from the same guide RNA expression system.
“However, caution is still needed, as shown in a recent study by Haeussler et al. (2016) that compared predictions from several sgRNA design tools with experimental results published in eight SpCas9 off-target studies. The authors showed evidence of algorithmic overfitting and the importance of using a model trained on data from the same guide RNA expression system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haeussler et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnce bound to target DNA, displacement of Cas9 from the DNA strand is challenging; 1 nM Cas9 cleaved ∼2.5 nM plasmid DNA after 120 min.
“And, once bound to the target DNA sequence, displacement of Cas9 from the DNA strand, even after DSB formation, is challenging – 1 nM Cas9 cleaved ∼2.5 nM plasmid DNA after 120 min (Jinek et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jinek et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicroinjection is considered the gold standard for introducing CRISPR components into cells, with efficiencies approaching 100%.
“Microinjection is considered the ‘gold standard’ for introducing CRISPR components into cells, with efficiencies approaching 100% (Yang et al., 2013; Horii et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Yang et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Horii et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationScr7 targets the NHEJ component DNA ligase IV and has been reported to increase the efficiency of HDR from Cas9 editing by up to 19-fold.
“One of the most commonly used inhibitors, Scr7, targets the NHEJ component DNA ligase IV, and has been reported to increase efficiency of HDR from Cas9 editing by up to 19-fold (Srivastava et al., 2012; Chu et al., 2015; Vartak & Raghavan, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Srivastava et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chu et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vartak & Raghavan, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOne report suggests that CRISPR/Cas9 may be less specific than ZFNs or TALENs due to its relatively shorter targeting sequence.
“One report suggests that CRISPR/Cas9 may be less specific than ZFNs or TALENs due to the relatively shorter targeting sequence (Cradick et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cradick et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationJinek et al. (2012) first used CRISPR/Cas9 to introduce double-stranded breaks in target DNA and showed that duo-tracrRNA:crRNA units could be engineered into a single guide RNA chimera that still directs efficient DNA cleavage.
“In 2012, Doudna and Charpentier showed the first use of CRISPR/Cas9 to introduce DSBs in target DNA (Jinek et al., 2012). Further, they showed that the duo-tracrRNA:crRNA units could be engineered into a single, truncated RNA chimera and still direct efficient DNA cleavage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jinek et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe SpCas9 PAM occurs every eight bps on average.
“This motif has been reported to occur every eight bps, on an average, for the SpCas9 PAM (Ramakrishna et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramakrishna et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCas9 protein is positively charged, while oligonucleotides and Cas9:sgRNA RNP are negatively charged.
“As an example, Cas9 protein is positively-charged, but oligonucleotides and Cas9:sgRNA RNP are negatively charged (Sun et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCas9-based gene editing in mice resulted in HDR repair efficiencies of 0.5-20%, while NHEJ-mediated repair occurred at 20-60%.
“For example, Cas9-based gene editing in mice resulted in HDR repair efficiencies of 0.5–20%, while NHEJ-mediated repair occurred at 20–60% (Maruyama et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maruyama et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany reports show no detectable off-target cleavage from CRISPR/Cas9 editing, with off-target effects being guide-RNA-specific.
“This contrasts with many reports that show no detectable off-target cleavage from CRISPR/Cas9 editing, with off-target effects being guide-RNA-specific (Cradick et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2013; Hsu et al., 2013; Pattanayak et al., 2013;Cho et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cradick et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fu et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hsu et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEach Cas9 ortholog has differing PAM sequences and variable activity.
“Each has differing PAM sequences and variable activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFactors that influence CRISPR/Cas9 efficacy include target DNA site selection, sgRNA design, off-target cutting, incidence/efficiency of HDR versus NHEJ, Cas9 activity, and method of delivery.
“These factors include target DNA site selection, sgRNA design, off-target cutting, incidence/efficiency of HDR vs. NHEJ, Cas9 activity, and the method of delivery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCRISPRi, using catalytically dead Cas9, represses expression of multiple genes simultaneously without altering the genome, as demonstrated in E. coli and human cells.
“They showed that this system, termed CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), could repress expression of multiple genes simultaneously without altering the genome. They demonstrated this gene repression in both Escherichia coli and human cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Qi et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe PAM from Neisseria meningitidis Cas9 is 5′-NNNNGATT-3′.
“As an example, the PAM from Neisseria meningitidis Cas9 is reported to be 5′-NNNNGATT-3′ (Jiang et al., 2013; Ma et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ma et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWang et al. (2016) could achieve approximately 70% in vitro modification efficiency in cells using lipid nanoparticles, but only after an intense screen to determine the most optimal lipids.
“While Wang et al. (2016) could achieve ∼70% in vitro modification efficiency in cells (see Figure 7(A)), that only came after an intense screen to determine the most optimal lipids with which to construct their liposomes for their system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationRandom insertion of the viral payload can result in an increase of expression and off-target effects, or even potential damage to the cell if the insertion randomly occurs within an important cellular protein.
“This can result in an increase of expression and off-target effects, or even potential damage to the cell if the insertion randomly occurs within an important cellular protein (Bestor, 2000; Papapetrou and Schambach, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bestor, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Papapetrou and Schambach, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSaCas9 is roughly 70% the size of SpCas9 while retaining the same potent cutting ability.
“This version of Cas9 is roughly 70% the size of SpCas9 while retaining the same potent cutting ability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ran et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdV vector-associated immunotoxicity in the liver and humoral immunity against SpCas9, as well as a potential SpCas9-specific cellular immune response, were detected.
“Importantly, in addition to displaying AdV vector-associated immunotoxicity in the liver, humoral immunity against SpCas9 was detected, as was a potential SpCas9-specific cellular immune response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationImmune responses are eventually seen to the AAV capsid, sometimes even causing CD-8 T-cell toxicity.
“Immune responses are eventually seen to the capsid, sometimes even causing CD-8 T-cell toxicity (Samulski and Muzyczka, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Samulski and Muzyczka, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLVs and AdVs are roughly 80-100 nm in diameter, compared with ∼20 nm for AAV, so larger insertions are better tolerated in these systems.
“The biggest difference between LV/AdV delivery and AAV delivery is the size of the particle; both LVs and AdVs are roughly 80–100 nm in diameter. Compared with the ∼20 nm diameter of AAV, larger insertions are better tolerated in these systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBoth LV and AdV can infect dividing and non-dividing cells; however, unlike LV, AdV does not integrate into the genome.
“Both LV and AdV can infect dividing and non-dividing cells; however, unlike LV, AdV does not integrate into the genome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMicroinjection is not limited by the molecular weight of the cargo, which is a significant limiting factor with viral vector delivery systems.
“Further, microinjection is not limited by the molecular weight of the cargo, which is a significant limiting factor with viral vector delivery systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAdV does not integrate into the genome, which is advantageous for limiting off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-based editing.
“This is advantageous in the case of CRISPR/Cas9-based editing for limiting off-target effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPackaging SpCas9 and sgRNA into one AAV vector is challenging and makes it difficult to include other elements such as reporters, fluorescent tags, multiple sgRNAs, or DNA templates for HDR.
“This makes consistent packaging of this construct challenging, and it is also extremely difficult to include other elements (such as reporters, fluorescent tags, multiple sgRNAs, or DNA templates for HDR) to help ensure successful delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components to cells and meet desired gene editing objectives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenLipid nanoparticles can be utilized in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo, allowing for extensive testing on a variety of scales of cell populations.
“They can also, like viral particles, be utilized in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo, allowing for extensive testing on a variety of scales of cell populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenElectroporation is less dependent on cell type than other delivery techniques and can efficiently transfer cargo into cells that are traditionally difficult to manipulate.
“Electroporation is less dependent on cell type than other delivery techniques and can efficiently transfer cargo into cells that are traditionally difficult to manipulate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSingle-stranded DNA is prone to random integration into the host genome, which may disrupt genes, result in constitutive expression of Cas9, and lead to greater off-target effects.
“However, single-stranded DNA is prone to random integration into the host genome, which may disrupt genes, result in constitutive expression of Cas9, and lead to greater off-target effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHydrodynamic delivery is significantly enriched in the liver, but also includes cells of the kidneys, lung, muscles, and heart.
“Delivery of cargo using this method is significantly enriched in the liver, but also includes cells of the kidneys, lung, muscles, and heart.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLipid nanoparticles do not contain any viral components, which helps minimize safety and immunogenicity concerns.
“Lipid nanoparticles do not contain any viral components, which helps minimize safety and immunogenicity concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUse of Cas9:sgRNA RNP reduces off-target effects versus plasmid transfection and is less stressful on cells, producing two-fold more embryonic stem cell colonies than plasmid transfection.
“The use of RNP was shown to reduce off-target effects versus plasmid transfection and be less stressful on the cells, producing two-fold more embryonic stem cell colonies than with plasmid transfection (Kim et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAAV-delivered genomic material can exist indefinitely in cells either as exogenous DNA or, with some modification, be directly integrated into the host DNA.
“Finally, unlike some other methods, the use of AAV for gene therapy provides a persistent source of the provided DNA, as AAV-delivered genomic material can exist indefinitely in cells either as exogenous DNA or, with some modification, be directly integrated into the host DNA (Deyle and Russell, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deyle and Russell, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKoike-Yusa et al. delivered 87,897 sgRNAs targeting 19,150 protein coding genes in mouse embryonic stem cells, both again constitutively expressing Cas9.
“Koike-Yusa et al. (2014) delivered 87,897 sgRNAs targeting 19,150 protein coding genes in mouse embryonic stem cells, both again constitutively expressing Cas9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Koike-Yusa et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAAV efficiently infects cells while provoking little to no innate or adaptive immune response or associated toxicity, at least upon first treatment with a serotype.
“The virus itself is able to efficiently infect cells while provoking little to no innate or adaptive immune response or associated toxicity, at least upon first treatment with a serotype (Daya and Berns, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Daya and Berns, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenPLL has been used to complex with Cas9 plasmid DNA, forming a multifunctional envelope-type nanodevice (MEND).
“PLL has been used to complex with Cas9 plasmid DNA, forming a multifunctional envelope-type nanodevice (MEND), described in the Emerging Delivery Technologies section of this review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe nanoclew attained efficiencies on the order of other high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 delivery systems while still containing no viral components or any exogenous material besides repeating DNA and PEI.
“This allowed the nanoclew to attain efficiencies on the order of other high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 delivery systems, but still contain no viral components (or indeed, any exogenous material besides repeating DNA and PEI).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAxford et al. (2017) demonstrated cellular and sub-cellular localization of CPP-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 RNP using confocal microscopy.
“Axford et al. (2017) in which the authors demonstrated cellular and sub-cellular localization of CPP-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 RNP using confocal microscopy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Axford et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMout et al. (2017) demonstrated that engineering Cas9:sgRNA RNP and AuNPs to associate creates a complex that can be efficiently delivered to cells and cause a desired mutation at a rate of roughly 30%.
“Mout et al. (2017) demonstrated that, by engineering Cas9:sgRNA RNP and AuNPs to associate with one another (Figure 8(B)), a complex is created that can be efficiently delivered to cells and cause a desired mutation at a rate of roughly 30%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mout et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSLO is a toxin produced by Group A streptococci that works by creating pores in mammalian cell membranes.
“SLO is a toxin produced by Group A streptococci that works by creating pores in mammalian cell membranes (Sierig et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sierig et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAuNPs are inert and will not trigger an immune response to the nanoparticle itself.
“AuNPs are inert and will not trigger an immune response to the nanoparticle itself (Lee et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationZALs complexed with Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA formed nanoparticles with approximately 15 nm diameter which showed effective transfection in mice, accumulating primarily in the liver, kidney, and lungs.
“ZALs were complexed with Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA, forming nanoparticles with ∼15 nm diameter which showed effective transfection in mice, accumulating primarily in the liver, kidney, and lungs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Miller et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAs a newer delivery technique, applications of iTOP have been limited to in vitro settings at this time.
“As another newer delivery technique, applications of iTOP have been limited to in vitro settings at this time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationKennedy et al. used FuGENE-6 to deliver Cas9 and sgRNA encoding plasmid DNA, inactivating human papillomavirus E6 or E7 gene in cervical carcinoma cells, resulting in cell-cycle arrest and eventual cell death.
“Kennedy et al. used FuGENE-6 to deliver Cas9 and sgRNA encoding plasmid DNA, inactivating human papillomavirus E6 or E7 gene in cervical carcinoma cells, resulting in cell-cycle arrest and eventual cell death (Kennedy et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kennedy et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CRISPR construct targeted the provirus genome, blocking expression of viral components and removing internal viral genes from the host cell chromosome.
“The CRISPR construct targeted the provirus genome, blocking expression of viral components and removing internal viral genes from the host cell chromosome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ebina et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAuNPs have been shown to stimulate immune cytokine production in general.
“Still, AuNPs have been shown to stimulate immune cytokine production in general (for a recent review, see Dykman and Khlebtsov, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dykman and Khlebtsov, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTreated mice further showed partial restoration of muscle function and reduced levels of fibrosis.
“Treated mice further showed partial restoration of muscle function and reduced levels of fibrosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA single injection of the AuNP-Cas9 conjugate corrected 5.4% of the mutated DMD-causing dystrophin gene and showed recovered dystrophin gene expression.
“A single injection of the AuNP-Cas9 conjugate corrected 5.4% of the mutated DMD-causing dystrophin gene and showed recovered dystrophin gene expression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenBranched PEI is cytotoxic.
“However, branched PEI is cytotoxic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBranched PEI have high charge density, facilitating efficient plasmid DNA packing, and pH-buffering ability which enables escape from endosomes.
“Branched PEI have high charge density, facilitating efficient plasmid DNA packing, and pH-buffering ability which enables escape from endosomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEfficiencies of CPPs themselves to penetrate cellular membranes vary with both attached cargo and cell type.
“as efficiencies of the CPP themselves to penetrate cellular membranes vary with both attached cargo and cell type.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEach class of CPPs can facilitate uptake of different types of proteins into different cell types, and often different combinations of CPPs and the desired molecule for uptake will result in different uptake levels.
“Each class of CPPs can facilitate uptake of different types of proteins into different cell types, and often different combinations of CPPs and the desired molecule for uptake will result in different uptake levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCPPs can be used for in vitro and ex vivo work quite readily, and extensive optimization for each cargo and cell type is usually required.
“CPPs can be used for in vitro and ex vivo work quite readily, and extensive optimization for each cargo and cell type is usually required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe same challenges of translocating the Cas9:sgRNA complex into the nucleus once it is within the cell must also be overcome for CPP delivery.
“The same challenges of translocating the Cas9:sgRNA complex into the nucleus once it is within the cell must also be overcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCas9 nickases and mutants that reduce non-specific DNA binding have been engineered specifically to ameliorate off-target cutting, though they are an imperfect solution.
“Cas9 nickases and mutants that reduce non-specific DNA binding have been engineered specifically to ameliorate this problem, though they are an imperfect solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEvery CRISPR delivery method has both advantages and disadvantages, and some can be quite specific or ill-suited to certain types of delivery.
“Every method has both advantages and disadvantages, and some can be quite specific or ill-suited to certain types of delivery (e.g. delivery to cells in a flask vs. delivery to a living organism).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere is currently limited information available on where various components of nanoparticle delivery systems end up in the body, how long they stay there, and whether there is any long-term toxicity associated with any component.
“There is currently limited information available on where various components of nanoparticle delivery systems end up in the body, how long they stay there, and whether there is any long-term toxicity associated with any”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOther groups have used SLO for delivery of siRNA and imaging agents for live-cell microscopy.
“Other groups have used SLO for delivery of siRNA (Brito et al., 2008) and imaging agents for live-cell microscopy (Teng et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Brito et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Teng et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMuch has been published on the altering of cell line genotypes and phenotypes using CRISPR/Cas9.
“Already, much has been published on the altering of cell line genotypes and phenotypes using this gene editing system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExtensive efforts have been made in understanding sgRNA binding and mismatch tolerance, leading to the development of several predictive software sgRNA design tools.
“Extensive efforts have been made in understanding sgRNA binding and mismatch tolerance, leading to the development of several predictive software sgRNA design tools;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCurrently, there are more options for delivery of small-molecule cargo than for the relatively large protein-nucleic acid complex.
“Currently, there are more options for delivery of small-molecule cargo than for the relatively large protein–nucleic acid complex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningEnsuring that the chosen delivery system is both safe and specific is still another barrier for delivery systems.
“Still another barrier for delivery systems is ensuring that the chosen system is both safe and specific.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe lipid coating of the particle can be tailored to maximize cargo loading, increase circulation times, and provide precise targeting and cargo release.
“The lipid coating of the particle can also be tailored to maximize cargo loading, increase circulation times, and provide precise targeting and cargo release.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA delivery vehicle that can target the desired cells with high-specificity will also limit off-target effects and improve safety.
“a delivery vehicle that can target the desired cells with high-specificity will also limit off-target effects and improve safety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe number of peer-reviewed scientific papers with the term CRISPR in the title or abstract has increased by 1,453% since 2011.
“Importantly, the CRISPR field is evolving at an incredible pace, with the number of peer-reviewed scientific papers with the term CRISPR in the title or abstract increasing by 1,453% since 2011.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The number of peer-reviewed scientific papers with the term CRISPR in the title or abstract has increased by 1,453% since 2011.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe therapeutic potential of CRISPR/Cas9 is great.
“As evident through the many examples presented in the ‘Delivery Methods’ portion of this review, the therapeutic potential of CRISPR/Cas9 is great.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA tetra-lamellar MEND targeted the cellular nucleus and mitochondria, and a PEG-peptide-DOPE-conjugated MEND targeted bladder cancer cells.
“Recently, a tetra-lamellar MEND (T-MEND) was developed that targeted the cellular nucleus and mitochondria, and a PEG-peptide-DOPE-conjugated MEND (PPD-MEND) was developed that targeted bladder cancer cells (Nakamura et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nakamura et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCompared with viral and lipid/polymer based vectors, inorganic nanoparticles are simpler to generate, with reproducible composition, size, and size distribution, are simpler to characterize and chemically functionalize, and are more stable over time.
“However, when compared with viral and lipid/polymer based vectors, inorganic nanoparticles are simpler to generate, with reproducible composition, size, and size distribution, are simpler to characterize and chemically functionalize, and are more stable over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWork has moved into animal models, and therapeutic effects are broad-ranging, including inhibition of viral infection, reversal of debilitating conditions such as muscular dystrophy, and elimination of tumors in cancer models.
“Work has even moved into animal models, and therapeutic effects are broad-ranging, including inhibition of viral infection, reversal of debilitating conditions such as muscular dystrophy, and elimination of tumors in cancer models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Effective in vivo human gene therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 is achievable once the factors influencing efficacy and delivery are addressed.
“We introduce several factors that influence CRISPR/Cas9 efficacy which must be addressed before effective in vivo human gene therapy can be realized.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In eukaryotic cells, Cas9 must translocate into the nucleus.
“For gene editing in eukaryotic cells, Cas9 must translocate into the nucleus.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Blood is incompressible.
“As blood is incompressible, the large bolus of liquid results in an increase in hydrodynamic pressure that temporarily enhances permeability into endothelial and parenchymal cells, allowing for cargo not normally capable of crossing a cellular membrane to pass into cells.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AAV is not known to cause or relate with any diseases in humans.
“AAV is not known to cause or relate with any diseases in humans.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hydrodynamic delivery is not currently being considered for clinical applications.
“Despite these successes, hydrodynamic delivery is not currently being considered for clinical applications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nucleic acids are typically unstable outside of cells and, owing to their highly anionic nature, do not easily pass through the cell membrane.
“Nucleic acids are typically unstable outside of cells, and owing to their highly anionic nature, they do not easily pass through the cell membrane.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Branched PEI is cytotoxic.
“However, branched PEI is cytotoxic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CPPs typically show low efficiency of the desired targeted mutation in cells, usually around 10–20%.
“Typically, CPPs show low efficiency of the desired targeted mutation in cells – usually around 10–20%.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Naked plasmids can achieve tangible long-term effects with an efficiency rate of just 0.4%.
“As shown above, however, naked plasmids can achieve tangible long-term effects with an efficiency rate of just 0.4%.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CRISPR/Cas9 components, whether in an RNP complex, as mRNA, or as DNA plasmids, are larger than other components that have been reported to load within lipid-coated mesoporous silica particles.
“CRISPR/Cas9 components, whether in an RNP complex, as mRNA, or as DNA plasmids, are larger than other components that have been reported to load within the particles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The number of peer-reviewed scientific papers with the term CRISPR in the title or abstract has increased by 1,453% since 2011.
“Importantly, the CRISPR field is evolving at an incredible pace, with the number of peer-reviewed scientific papers with the term CRISPR in the title or abstract increasing by 1,453% since 2011.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Constitutive expression of Cas9 and gRNA from lentiviral vectors increases the risk of off-target effects.
“Moreover, the constitutive expression of both Cas9 protein and gRNA increases the risk of off‐target effects (Lino et al., 2018; Papapetrou & Schambach, 2016).”
From CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Nucleofection for Genome Editing in Primary Human Keratinocytes: Knockouts, Deletions, and Homology‐Directed Repair Mutagenesis (2024) · cites this paper as Lino et al., 2018
The “Lentivirus (LV) and adenovirus (AdV)” section (page unavailable) says viral-payload integration can increase expression and off-target effects. The “Cas9 activity” section (page unavailable) also links excessive sgRNA to off-target effects. Neither passage specifically says that constitutive expression of both Cas9 and gRNA is what increases the risk. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn a Phase I clinical trial, an autologous bispecific CD19/CD22-targeted CAR T cell therapy was manufactured using the FasT CAR platform, reducing cell culture time to less than 24 hours.
“For a Phase I clinical trial, researchers manufactured an autologous, bispecific CD19/CD22-targeted CAR T cell therapy using the FasT CAR platform, reducing cell culture time to less than 24 hours (117,118).”
From Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [117]
The Introduction discusses earlier gene-therapy trials, and the delivery-method sections discuss CRISPR/Cas9 rather than CAR T-cell manufacturing. Searches for FasT CAR, CD19/CD22, the Phase I trial, and a culture time under 24 hours found no passage addressing the claimed therapy or manufacturing time in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNon-viral materials for delivery of genome editing tools are similar to those used for mRNA delivery.
“These materials are similar to those used for mRNA delivery.[202, 205, 207–211]”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [209]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Inorganic nanoparticles are called untested despite reported AuNP delivery
MinorThe emerging-technologies introduction says none of its listed technologies has been demonstrated for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. Its inorganic-nanoparticle section includes AuNPs and explicitly says their CRISPR/Cas9 delivery was described above.
“While none of these have been demonstrated in the literature for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, their properties make them naturally amenable for use as CRISPR/Cas delivery vehicles.”
“Examples of these include AuNPs, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), bare mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNPs), and dense silica nanoparticles (SiNPs). The use of AuNPs for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery was described above.”
Figure 6 cites a different year for Platt et al.
MinorThe Figure 6 caption attributes the adapted material to Platt et al. (2016), whereas the paper's reference entry for the cited lung-cancer work is dated 2014.
“Adapted with permission from Platt et al. (2016). Copyright 2014 Elsevier Inc.”
“148. Platt RJ, Chen S, Zhou Y, et al (2014). CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling.”
MEND delivery is described as both demonstrated and unreported
MinorThe review says PLL has been used to form a MEND with Cas9 plasmid DNA, but later says none of the emerging technologies, including MENDs, has been demonstrated for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery.
“PLL has been used to complex with Cas9 plasmid DNA, forming a multifunctional envelope-type nanodevice (MEND), described in the Emerging Delivery Technologies section of this review.”
“While none of these have been demonstrated in the literature for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, their properties make them naturally amenable for use as CRISPR/Cas delivery vehicles.”
Two advances are said to occur in 2002, but the second is dated 2005
MinorThe paragraph says both significant advances were made in 2002, then dates the second advance to 2005.
“Two significant advances in the understanding of the CRISPR system were then made in 2002”
“The second significant advance occurred in 2005”
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116 · see citing works
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339 · see citing works
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210 · see citing works
CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes
Barrangou, R., Fremaux, C., Deveau, H., Richards, M., Boyaval, P., Moineau, S., Romero, D. A., & Horvath, P. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138140 · Cited by 6,304 · see citing works
Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells
Shalem, O., Sanjana, N. E., Hartenian, E., Shi, X., Scott, D. A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Heckl, D., Ebert, B. L., Root, D. E., Doench, J. G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247005 · Cited by 5,234 · see citing works
Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression
Qi, L. S., Larson, M. H., Gilbert, L. A., Doudna, J. A., Weissman, J. S., Arkin, A. P., & Lim, W. A. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022 · Cited by 5,016 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Qu et al. repurposed CRISPR into an RNA-guided platform for controlling gene expression by developing a catalytically-dead Cas9 enzyme (dCas9) that retained its capability to recognize and bind a target DNA sequence (Qi et al., 2013).”
BackgroundIn Vivo Gene Delivery and Stable Transduction of Nondividing Cells by a Lentiviral Vector
Naldini, L., Blömer, U., Gallay, P., Ory, D., Mulligan, R., Gage, F. H., Verma, I. M., & Trono, D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5259.263 · Cited by 4,903 · see citing works
DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741 · see citing works
Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage
Gaudelli, N. M., Komor, A. C., Rees, H. A., Packer, M. S., Badran, A. H., Bryson, D. I., & Liu, D. R. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24644 · Cited by 4,184 · see citing works
Wang, H., Yang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Dawlaty, M. M., Cheng, A. W., Zhang, F., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · Cited by 3,495 · see citing works
Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Lin, C.-Y., Gootenberg, J. S., Konermann, S., Trevino, A. E., Scott, D. A., Inoue, A., Matoba, S., Zhang, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021 · Cited by 3,299 · see citing works
High-Frequency off-Target Mutagenesis Induced by CRISPR-Cas Nucleases in Human Cells
Fu, Y., Foden, J. A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M. L., Reyon, D., Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2623 · Cited by 3,292 · see citing works
Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M., & Lander, E. S. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246981 · Cited by 2,856 · see citing works
Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex
Konermann, S., Brigham, M. D., Trevino, A. E., Joung, J., Abudayyeh, O. O., Barcena, C., Hsu, P. D., Habib, N., Gootenberg, J. S., Nishimasu, H., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14136 · Cited by 2,825 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…many areas, including identifying and understanding mechanisms of genetic diseases (Findlay et al., 2014; Gilbert et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2014; Konermann et al., 2015), validating disease targets (Shalem et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014), developing animal disease models (Wang et al., 2013;…”
BackgroundGenome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation
Gilbert, L. A., Horlbeck, M. A., Adamson, B., Villalta, J. E., Chen, Y., Whitehead, E. H., Guimaraes, C., Panning, B., Ploegh, H. L., Bassik, M. C., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029 · Cited by 2,728 · see citing works
Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease.
Cavazzana-Calvo, M., Hacein-Bey, S., Basile, G. D. S., Gross, F., Yvon, E., Nusbaum, P., Selz, F., Hue, C., Certain, S., Casanova, J., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.669 · Cited by 2,703 · see citing works
In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9
Ran, F. A., Cong, L., Yan, W. X., Scott, D. A., Gootenberg, J. S., Kriz, A. J., Zetsche, B., Shalem, O., Wu, X., Makarova, K. S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14299 · Cited by 2,687 · see citing works
High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects
Kleinstiver, B. P., Pattanayak, V., Prew, M. S., Tsai, S. Q., Nguyen, N. T., Zheng, Z., & Joung, J. K. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16526 · Cited by 2,673 · see citing works
Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes
Brouns, S. J. J., Jore, M. M., Lundgren, M., Westra, E. R., Slijkhuis, R. J. H., Snijders, A. P., Dickman, M. J., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V., & John van der, O. O. S. T. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159689 · Cited by 2,593 · see citing works
CRISPR RNA Maturation by Trans-Encoded Small RNA and Host Factor RNase III
Deltcheva, E., Chylinski, K., Sharma, C. M., Gonzales, K., Chao, Y., Pirzada, Z. A., Eckert, M. R., Vogel, J., & Charpentier, E. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09886 · Cited by 2,563 · see citing works
Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems
Makarova, K. S., Haft, D. H., Barrangou, R., Brouns, S. J. J., Charpentier, E., Horvath, P., Moineau, S., Mojica, F. J. M., Wolf, Y. I., Yakunin, A. F., et al. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2577 · Cited by 2,512 · see citing works
An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems
Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., Alkhnbashi, O. S., Costa, F., Shah, S. A., Saunders, S. J., Barrangou, R., Brouns, S. J. J., Charpentier, E., Haft, D. H., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3569 · Cited by 2,504 · see citing works
Progress and problems with the use of viral vectors for gene therapy
Thomas, C. E., Ehrhardt, A., & Kay, M. A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1066 · Cited by 2,501 · see citing works
RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems
Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F., & Marraffini, L. A. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2508 · Cited by 2,429 · see citing works
Ishino, Y., Shinagawa, H., Makino, K., Amemura, M., & Nakata, A. (1987) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987 · Cited by 2,421 · see citing works
Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity
Slaymaker, I. M., Gao, L., Zetsche, B., Scott, D. A., Yan, W. X., & Zhang, F. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad5227 · Cited by 2,414 · see citing works
Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases
Urnov, F. D., Rebar, E. J., Holmes, M. C., Zhang, H. S., & Gregory, P. D. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2842 · Cited by 2,285 · see citing works
Intervening Sequences of Regularly Spaced Prokaryotic Repeats Derive from Foreign Genetic Elements
Mojica, F. J. M., D�ez-Villase�or, C., Garc�a-Mart�nez, J., & Soria, E. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3 · Cited by 2,219 · see citing works
A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing
Miller, J. C., Tan, S., Qiao, G., Barlow, K. A., Wang, J., Xia, D. F., Meng, X., Paschon, D. E., Leung, E., Hinkley, S. J., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1755 · Cited by 2,098 · see citing works
Altering the Genome by Homologous Recombination
Capecchi, M. R. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2660260 · Cited by 2,037 · see citing works
Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes
Jansen, R., van Embden, J. D. A., Gaastra, W., & Schouls, L. M. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x · Cited by 2,035 · see citing works
Čermák, T., Doyle, E., Christian, M. L., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Schmidt, C. L., Baller, J. A., Somia, N. V., Bogdanove, A. J., & Voytas, D. F. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr218 · Cited by 2,034 · see citing works
Targeting DNA Double-Strand Breaks with TAL Effector Nucleases
Christian, M. L., Čermák, T., Doyle, E., Schmidt, C. L., Zhang, F., Hummel, A. W., Bogdanove, A. J., & Voytas, D. F. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.110.120717 · Cited by 2,033 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas9 Knockin Mice for Genome Editing and Cancer Modeling
Platt, R. J., Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Yim, M. J., Swiech, L., Kempton, H. R., Dahlman, J. E., Parnas, O., Eisenhaure, T. M., Jovanovic, M., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.014 · Cited by 2,001 · see citing works
Hilton, I. B., D’Ippolito, A. M., Vockley, C. M., Thakore, P. I., Crawford, G. E., Reddy, T. E., & Gersbach, C. A. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3199 · Cited by 1,878 · see citing works
Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease
Cho, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, J. M., & Kim, J.-S. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2507 · Cited by 1,863 · see citing works
Kim, S., Kim, D., Cho, S. W., Kim, J., & Kim, J.-S. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.171322.113 · Cited by 1,856 · see citing works
DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9
Sternberg, S. H., Redding, S., Jínek, M., Greene, E. C., & Doudna, J. A. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13011 · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
Haeussler, M., Schönig, K., Eckert, H., Eschstruth, A., Mianné, J., Renaud, J.-B., Schneider-Maunoury, S., Shkumatava, A., Teboul, L., Kent, J., et al. (2016) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2 · Cited by 1,756 · see citing works
Mali, P., Aach, J., Stranges, P. B., Esvelt, K. M., Moosburner, M., Kosuri, S., Yang, L., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2675 · Cited by 1,752 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Cho et al. (2013) used the S. pyogenes Cas9 system (SpCas9) to edit human cells to incorporate GFP and RFP. Mali et al. (2013) engineered the SpCas9 system and cloned it into human cells, then performed multiplexed editing of target loci.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBolotin, A., Quinquis, B., Sorokin, A., & Ehrlich, S. D. (2005) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.28048-0 · Cited by 1,733 · see citing works
TALENs: A widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing
Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3486 · Cited by 1,650 · see citing works
Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities
Kleinstiver, B. P., Prew, M. S., Tsai, S. Q., Topkar, V. V., Nguyen, N. T., Zheng, Z., Gonzales, A. P. W., Li, Z., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14592 · Cited by 1,624 · see citing works
Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation
Doench, J. G., Hartenian, E., Graham, D. B., Tothova, Z., Hegde, M., Smith, I., Sullender, M., Ebert, B. L., Xavier, R. J., & Root, D. E. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3026 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
Yang, H., Wang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Cheng, A. W., Shi, L., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.022 · Cited by 1,596 · see citing works
A Protein-Tagging System for Signal Amplification in Gene Expression and Fluorescence Imaging
Tanenbaum, M. E., Gilbert, L. A., Qi, L. S., Weissman, J. S., & Vale, R. D. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.039 · Cited by 1,559 · see citing works
Pattanayak, V., Lin, S., Guilinger, J. P., Ma, E., Doudna, J. A., & Liu, D. R. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2673 · Cited by 1,487 · cited 17× · see citing works
“As an example, the PAM from Neisseria meningitidis Cas9 is reported to be 50-NNNNGATT-30 (Jiang et al., 2013; Ma et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialZuris, J. A., Thompson, D. B., Shu, Y., Guilinger, J. P., Bessen, J. L., Hu, J. H., Maeder, M. L., Joung, J. K., Chen, Z.-Y., & Liu, D. R. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3081 · Cited by 1,460 · see citing works
Schwank, G., Koo, B.-K., Sasselli, V., Dekkers, J. F., Heo, I., Demircan, T., Sasaki, N., Boymans, S., Cuppen, E., van der Ent, C. K., et al. (2013) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.002 · Cited by 1,424 · see citing works
Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases
Cho, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, Y., Kweon, J., Kim, H. S., Bae, S., & Kim, J.-S. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.162339.113 · Cited by 1,356 · see citing works
Pourcel, C., Salvignol, G., & Vergnaud, G. (2005) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.27437-0 · Cited by 1,347 · see citing works
Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges
Cox, D. B. T., Platt, R. J., & Zhang, F. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3793 · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
mRNA stability in mammalian cells
Ross, J. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.3.423-450.1995 · Cited by 1,324 · see citing works
Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease
Anders, C., Niewoehner, O., Duerst, A., & Jínek, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13579 · Cited by 1,319 · see citing works
CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo
Moreno-Mateos, M. A., Vejnar, C. E., Beaudoin, J.-D., Fernandez, J. P., Mis, E. K., Khokha, M. K., & Giraldez, A. J. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3543 · Cited by 1,290 · see citing works
Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation
Jinek, M., Jiang, F., Taylor, D. W., Sternberg, S. H., Kaya, E., Ma, E., Anders, C., Hauer, M., Zhou, K., Lin, S., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247997 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Takata, M., Sasaki, M. S., Sonoda, E., Morrison, C., Hashimoto, M., Utsumi, H., Yamaguchi‐Iwai, Y., Shinohara, A., & Takeda, S. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.18.5497 · Cited by 1,229 · see citing works
Discovery and Functional Characterization of Diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas Systems
Shmakov, S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., Gootenberg, J. S., Semenova, E., Станиславович, М. Л., Joung, J., Konermann, S., Severinov, K., et al. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.008 · Cited by 1,221 · see citing works
Chu, V. T., Weber, T., Wefers, B., Wurst, W., Sander, S., Rajewsky, K., & Kühn, R. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3198 · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
Lin, S., Staahl, B. T., Alla, R. K., & Doudna, J. A. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.04766 · Cited by 1,189 · see citing works
FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing
Reyon, D., Tsai, S. Q., Khayter, C., Foden, J. A., Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2170 · Cited by 1,171 · see citing works
In vivo genome editing improves muscle function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Nelson, C. E., Hakim, C. H., Ousterout, D. G., Thakore, P. I., Moreb, E. A., Rivera, R. M. C., Madhavan, S., Pan, X., Ran, F. A., Yan, W. X., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad5143 · Cited by 1,144 · see citing works
Maruyama, T., Dougan, S. K., Truttmann, M. C., Bilate, A. M., Ingram, J. R., & Ploegh, H. L. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3190 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR-Cas9–mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids
Matano, M., Date, S., Shimokawa, M., Takano, A., Fujii, M., Ohta, Y., Watanabe, T., Kanai, T., & Sato, T. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3802 · Cited by 1,135 · see citing works
Sustained Correction of X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency by ex Vivo Gene Therapy
Hacein‐Bey‐Abina, S., Deist, F. L., Carlier, F., Bouneaud, C., Hue, C., de Villartay, J., Thrasher, A. J., Wulffraat, N. M., Sorensen, R., Dupuis‐Girod, S., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012616 · Cited by 1,094 · see citing works
Genome Engineering With Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Carroll, D. (2011) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.131433 · Cited by 1,076 · see citing works
Koike-Yusa, H., Li, Y., Tan, E.-P., Velasco-Herrera, M. D. C., & Yusa, K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2800 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
DNA Recognition by Cys<sub>2</sub>His<sub>2</sub> Zinc Finger Proteins
Wolfe, S. A., Nekludova, L., & Pabo, C. O. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.183 · Cited by 1,053 · see citing works
An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing
Miller, J. C., Holmes, M. C., Wang, J., Guschin, D. Y., Lee, Y.-L., Rupniewski, I., Beausejour, C. M., Waite, A. J., Wang, N. S., Kim, K. A., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1319 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
In vivo gene editing in dystrophic mouse muscle and muscle stem cells
Tabebordbar, M., Zhu, K., Cheng, J. K. W., Chew, W. L., Widrick, J. J., Yan, W. X., Maesner, C., Wu, E. Y., Xiao, R., Ran, F. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad5177 · Cited by 1,046 · see citing works
Niu, Y., Shen, B., Cui, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Wang, L., Kang, Y., Zhao, X., Si, W., Li, W., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.027 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
Effect of genome size on AAV vector packaging
Wu, Z., Yang, H., & Colosi, P. (2010) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2009.255 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature’s Toolbox for Genome Engineering
Wright, A. V., Nuñez, J. K., & Doudna, J. A. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.035 · Cited by 1,001 · see citing works
Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing
Tsai, S. Q., Wyvekens, N., Khayter, C., Foden, J. A., Thapar, V., Reyon, D., Goodwin, M. J., Aryee, M. J., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2908 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype
Yin, H., Xue, W., Chen, S., Bogorad, R. L., Benedetti, E., Grompe, M., Koteliansky, V., Sharp, P. A., Jacks, T., & Anderson, D. G. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2884 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9
Paquet, D., Kwart, D., Chen, A., Sproul, A., Jacob, S., Teo, S., Olsen, K. M., Gregg, A., Noggle, S., & Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17664 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Long, C., Amoasii, L., Mireault, A. A., McAnally, J., Li, H. Z., Sanchez‐Ortiz, E., Bhattacharyya, S., Shelton, J. M., Bassel‐Duby, R., & Olson, E. N. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad5725 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Gene therapy using adeno-associated virus vectors
Daya, S., & Berns, K. I. (2008) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00008-08 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Gene Therapy Death Prompts Review of Adenovirus Vector
Marshall, E. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5448.2244 · Cited by 918 · see citing works
Yin, H., Song, C.-Q., Dorkin, J. R., Zhu, L. J., Li, Y., Wu, Q., Park, A., Yang, J., Suresh, S., Bizhanova, A., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3471 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
Targeted Chromosomal Cleavage and Mutagenesis in Drosophila Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Bibikova, M., Golic, M., Golic, K. G., & Carroll, D. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1169 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
Guilinger, J. P., Thompson, D. B., & Liu, D. R. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2909 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Enhancing Gene Targeting with Designed Zinc Finger Nucleases
Bibikova, M. V., Beumer, K. J., Trautman, J. K., & Carroll, D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079512 · Cited by 824 · see citing works
Mojica, F. J. M., Díez‐Villaseñor, C., Soria, E., & Juez, G. (2000) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing
Esvelt, K. M., Mali, P., Braff, J. L., Moosburner, M., Yaung, S. J., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2681 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
CRISPR-mediated direct mutation of cancer genes in the mouse liver
Xue, W., Chen, S., Yin, H., Tammela, T., Papagiannakopoulos, T., Joshi, N. S., Cai, W., Yang, G., Bronson, R., Crowley, D. G., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13589 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
In vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9
Swiech, L., Heidenreich, M., Banerjee, A., Habib, N., Li, Y., Trombetta, J., Sur, M., & Zhang, F. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3055 · Cited by 772 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many groups have reported success packaging the SpCas9 and sgRNA into two separate AAV particles and using them for co-infection (Swiech et al., 2015; Hung et al., 2016).”
BackgroundLee, K., Conboy, M., Park, H. M., Jiang, F., Kim, H. J., Dewitt, M. A., Mackley, V. A., Chang, K., Rao, A., Skinner, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-017-0137-2 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection
Liang, X., Potter, J., Kumar, S., Zou, Y., Quintanilla, R., Sridharan, M., Carte, J., Chen, W., Roark, N., Ranganathan, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.04.024 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells
Zhou, Y., Zhu, S., Cai, C., Yuan, P., Li, C., Huang, Y., & Wei, W. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13166 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Soldner, F., Laganière, J., Cheng, A. W., Hockemeyer, D., Gao, Q., Alagappan, R., Khurana, V., Golbe, L. I., Myers, R. H., Lindquist, S., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.019 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Prevention of muscular dystrophy in mice by CRISPR/Cas9–mediated editing of germline DNA
Long, C., McAnally, J. R., Shelton, J. M., Mireault, A. A., Bassel-Duby, R., & Olson, E. N. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254445 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Generation of knock-in primary human T cells using Cas9 ribonucleoproteins
Schumann, K., Lin, S., Boyer, E., Simeonov, D. R., Subramaniam, M., Gate, R. E., Haliburton, G. E., Ye, C. J., Bluestone, J. A., Doudna, J. A., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1512503112 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
Hou, Z., Zhang, Y., Propson, N. E., Howden, S. E., Chu, L.-F., Sontheimer, E. J., & Thomson, J. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1313587110 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Gene disruption by cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery of Cas9 protein and guide RNA
Ramakrishna, S., Kwaku Dad, A.-B., Beloor, J., Gopalappa, R., Lee, S.-K., & Kim, H. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.171264.113 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
In vivo engineering of oncogenic chromosomal rearrangements with the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Maddalo, D., Manchado, E., Concepcion, C. P., Bonetti, C., Vidigal, J. A., Han, Y.-C., Ogrodowski, P., Crippa, A., Rekhtman, N., de Stanchina, E., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13902 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Efficacy of Gene Therapy for X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
Hacein‐Bey‐Abina, S., Hauer, J., Lim, A., Pïcard, C., Wang, G. P., Berry, C. C., Martinache, C., Rieux‐Laucat, F., Latour, S., Belohradsky, B. H., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1000164 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
A light-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 system for control of endogenous gene activation
Polstein, L. R., & Gersbach, C. A. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1753 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Self‐assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR–Cas9 for genome editing
Sun, W., Ji, W., Hall, J. M., Hu, Q., Wang, C., Beisel, C. L., & Gu, Z. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201506030 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design
Xu, H., Xiao, T., Chen, C.-H., Li, W., Meyer, C. A., Wu, Q., Wu, D., Cong, L., Zhang, F., Liu, J. S., et al. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.191452.115 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Efficient delivery of genome-editing proteins using bioreducible lipid nanoparticles
Wang, M., Zuris, J. A., Meng, F., Rees, H., Sun, S., Deng, P., Han, Y., Gao, X., Pouli, D., Wu, Q., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1520244113 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
A Multifunctional AAV-CRISPR-Cas9 and Its Host Response
Chew, W. L., Tabebordbar, M., Cheng, J. K. W., Mali, P., Wu, E. Y., Ng, A. H. M., Zhu, K., Wagers, A. J., & Church, G. M. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3993 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9
Wu, Y., Liang, D., Wang, Y., Bai, M., Tang, W., Bao, S., Yan, Z., Li, D., & Li, J. (2013) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.10.016 · Cited by 614 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2014), correction of a cataract-causing mutation in mice (Wu et al., 2013), and correction of a Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)-causing mutation in mice (Long et al.”
BackgroundBroadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition
Kleinstiver, B. P., Prew, M. S., Tsai, S. Q., Nguyen, N. T., Topkar, V. V., Zheng, Z., & Joung, J. K. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3404 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9 for optogenetic genome editing
Nihongaki, Y., Kawano, F., Nakajima, T., & Sato, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3245 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting β-globin and CCR5 genes have substantial off-target activity
Cradick, T. J., Fine, E. J., Antico, C. J., & Bao, G. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt714 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
AAV-Mediated Gene Therapy for Research and Therapeutic Purposes
Samulski, R. J., & Muzyczka, N. (2014) · Annual Review of Virology · doi:10.1146/annurev-virology-031413-085355 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Direct cytosolic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-ribonucleoprotein for efficient gene editing
Mout, R., Ray, M., Yesilbag Tonga, G., Lee, Y.-W., Tay, T., Sasaki, K., & Rotello, V. M. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b07600 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Expression of a site-specific endonuclease stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells.
Rouet, P., Smih, F., & Jasin, M. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.13.6064 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Harnessing the CRISPR/Cas9 system to disrupt latent HIV-1 provirus
Ebina, H., Misawa, N., Kanemura, Y., & Koyanagi, Y. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02510 · Cited by 565 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ebina et al. (2013) used calcium phosphate transfection to deliver plasmid DNA encoding Cas9 and sgRNA into latent HIV-1infected human 293 T cells.”
MethodGeneration of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting
Shen, B., Zhang, J., Wu, H., Wang, J., Ma, K., Li, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, P., & Huang, X. (2013) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2013.46 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Heckl, D., Kowalczyk, M. S., Yudovich, D., Belizaire, R., Puram, R. V., McConkey, M. E., Thielke, A., Aster, J. C., Regev, A., & Ebert, B. L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2951 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
TAL nucleases (TALNs): hybrid proteins composed of TAL effectors and FokI DNA-cleavage domain
Li, T., Huang, S., Jiang, W. Z., Wright, D. A., Spalding, M. H., Weeks, D. P., & Yang, B. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq704 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Expanding the genetic editing tool kit: ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas9
Gupta, R. M., & Musunuru, K. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci72992 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Enhancement of transfection by physical concentration of DNA at the cell surface
Luo, D., & Saltzman, W. M. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/78523 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Miller, J. B., Zhang, S., Kos, P., Xiong, H., Zhou, K., Perelman, S. S., Zhu, H., & Siegwart, D. J. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201610209 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
An unbiased genome-wide analysis of zinc-finger nuclease specificity
Gabriel, R., Lombardo, A., Arens, A., Miller, J. C., Genovese, P., Kaeppel, C., Nowrouzi, A., Bartholomae, C. C., Wang, J., Friedman, G., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1948 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes
John van der, O. O. S. T., Jore, M. M., Westra, E. R., Lundgren, M., & Brouns, S. J. J. (2009) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2009.05.002 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Permanent Alteration of PCSK9 With In Vivo CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing
Ding, Q., Strong, A., Patel, K. M., Ng, S.-L., Gosis, B. S., Regan, S. N., Cowan, C. A., Rader, D. J., & Musunuru, K. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.304351 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-Cas systems
Chylinski, K., Makarova, K. S., Charpentier, E., & Koonin, E. V. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku241 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Lander, E. S. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.041 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
van Soolingen, D., de Haas, P. E., Hermans, P. W. M., Groenen, P. M. W., & van Embden, J. D. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.31.8.1987-1995.1993 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Inducible in vivo genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9
Dow, L. E., Fisher, J., O’Rourke, K. P., Muley, A., Kastenhuber, E. R., Livshits, G., Tschaharganeh, D. F., Socci, N. D., & Lowe, S. W. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3155 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
High-frequency genome editing using ssDNA oligonucleotides with zinc-finger nucleases
Chen, F., Pruett‐Miller, S. M., Huang, Y., Gjoka, M., Duda, K., Taunton, J., Collingwood, T. N., Frödin, M., & Davis, G. D. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1653 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Ousterout, D. G., Kabadi, A. M., Thakore, P. I., Majoros, W. H., Reddy, T. E., & Gersbach, C. A. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7244 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells
Yu, C., Liu, Y., Ma, T., Liu, K., Xu, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., La Russa, M., Xie, M., Ding, S., et al. (2015) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.003 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Revealing off-target cleavage specificities of zinc-finger nucleases by in vitro selection
Pattanayak, V., Ramirez, C. L., Joung, J. K., & Liu, D. R. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1670 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Direct observation of R-loop formation by single RNA-guided Cas9 and Cascade effector complexes
Szczelkun, M. D., Tikhomirova, M. S., Šinkūnas, T., Gasiūnas, G., Karvelis, T., Pschera, P., Šikšnys, V., & Seidel, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1402597111 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Annotation and Classification of CRISPR-Cas Systems
Makarova, K. S., & Koonin, E. V. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2687-9_4 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Crystal Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9
Nishimasu, H., Cong, L., Yan, W. X., Ran, F. A., Zetsche, B., Li, Y., Kurabayashi, A., Ishitani, R., Zhang, F., & Nureki, O. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.007 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Unexpected failure rates for modular assembly of engineered zinc fingers
Ramirez, C. L., Foley, J. E., Wright, D. A., Müller-Lerch, F., Rahman, S. H., Cornu, T. I., Winfrey, R. J., Sander, J. D., Fu, F., Townsend, J. A., et al. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0508-374 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Multicolor CRISPR labeling of chromosomal loci in human cells
Ma, H., Naseri, A., Reyes‐Gutierrez, P., Wolfe, S. A., Zhang, S., & Pederson, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1420024112 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Enhancing zinc-finger-nuclease activity with improved obligate heterodimeric architectures
Doyon, Y., Vo, T. D., Mendel, M. C., Greenberg, S. G., Wang, J., Xia, D. F., Miller, J. C., Urnov, F. D., Gregory, P. D., & Holmes, M. C. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1539 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Structures of the RNA-guided surveillance complex from a bacterial immune system
Wiedenheft, B., Lander, G. C., Zhou, K., Jore, M. M., Brouns, S. J. J., John van der, O. O. S. T., Doudna, J. A., & Nogales, E. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10402 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
The CRISPR/Cas9 system facilitates clearance of the intrahepatic HBV templates in vivo
Lin, S.-R., Yang, H.-C., Kuo, Y.-T., Liu, C.-J., Yang, T.-Y., Sung, K.-C., Lin, Y.-Y., Wang, H.-Y., Wang, C.-C., Shen, Y.-C., et al. (2014) · Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2014.38 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Multiplex genome engineering in human cells using all-in-one CRISPR/Cas9 vector system
Sakuma, T., Nishikawa, A., Kume, S., Chayama, K., & Yamamoto, T. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05400 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Srivastava, M., Nambiar, M., Sharma, S., Karki, S. S., Goldsmith, G., Hegde, M. B., Kumar, S., Pandey, M., Singh, R. K., Ray, P., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.054 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Development of an intein-mediated split-Cas9 system for gene therapy
Truong, D.-J. J., Kühner, K., Kühn, R., Werfel, S., Engelhardt, S., Wurst, W., & Ortiz, O. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv601 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-based genome engineering from a single lentiviral vector
Kabadi, A. M., Ousterout, D. G., Hilton, I. B., & Gersbach, C. A. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku749 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems
Chylinski, K., Rhun, A. L., & Charpentier, E. (2013) · RNA Biology · doi:10.4161/rna.24321 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Mojica, F. J. M., Juez, G., & Rodríguez‐Valera, F. (1993) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01721.x · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Saturation editing of genomic regions by multiplex homology-directed repair
Findlay, G. M., Boyle, E. A., Hause, R. J., Klein, J. C., & Shendure, J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13695 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
A CRISPR screen defines a signal peptide processing pathway required by flaviviruses
Zhang, R., Miner, J. J., Gorman, M. J., Rausch, K., Ramage, H. R., White, J. P., Zuiani, A., Zhang, P., Fernández, E., Zhang, Q., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18625 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Porous Nanoparticle Supported Lipid Bilayers (Protocells) as Delivery Vehicles
Liu, J., Stace-Naughton, A., Jiang, X., & Brinker, C. J. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja808018y · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Wang, D., Mou, H., Li, S., Li, Y., Hough, S., Tran, K., Li, J., Yin, H., Anderson, D. G., Sontheimer, E. J., et al. (2015) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2015.087 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Efficient Intracellular Delivery of Native Proteins
D’Astolfo, D. S., Pagliero, R. J., Pras, A., Karthaus, W. R., Clevers, H. C., Prasad, V., Lebbink, R. J., Rehmann, H., & Geijsen, N. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.028 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes
Chen, S., Lee, B. J., Lee, A. Y.-F., Modzelewski, A. J., & He, L. (2016) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.733154 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Delivery of proteins into living cells by reversible membrane permeabilization with streptolysin-O
Walev, I., Bhakdi, S. C., Hofmann, F., Djonder, N., Valeva, A., Aktories, K., & Bhakdi, S. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.051429498 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Cocoon-Like Self-Degradable DNA Nanoclew for Anticancer Drug Delivery
Sun, W., Jiang, T., Lü, Y., Reiff, M., Mo, R., & Gu, Z. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5088024 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Hashimoto, M., & Takemoto, T. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11315 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Ye, L., Wang, J., Beyer, A. I., Teque, F., Cradick, T. J., Qi, Z., Chang, J. C., Bao, G., Muench, M. O., Yu, J., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1407473111 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining
Hefferin, M. L., & Tomkinson, A. E. (2005) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.12.005 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Crispo, M., Mulet, A. P., Tesson, L., Barrera, N., Cuadro, F., dos Santos-Neto, P. C., Nguyen, T. H., Crénéguy, A., Brusselle, L., Anegón, I., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136690 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Targeted genomic rearrangements using CRISPR/Cas technology
Choi, P. S., & Meyerson, M. M. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4728 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Gaspar, H., Parsley, K., Howe, S., King, D., Gilmour, K. C., Sinclair, J., Brouns, G., Schmidt, M., von Kalle, C., Barington, T., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17590-9 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Kennedy, E. M., Kornepati, A. V. R., Goldstein, M., Bogerd, H. P., Poling, B. C., Whisnant, A. W., Kastan, M. B., & Cullen, B. R. (2014) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01879-14 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Somatic CRISPR/Cas9-mediated tumour suppressor disruption enables versatile brain tumour modelling
Zuckermann, M., Hovestadt, V., Knobbe-Thomsen, C. B., Zapatka, M., Northcott, P. A., Schramm, K., Belic, J., Jones, D., Tschida, B. R., Moriarity, B. S., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8391 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Check, E. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/420116a · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Mice by Zygote Electroporation of Nuclease
Qin, W., Dion, S., Kutny, P. M., Zhang, Y., Cheng, A. W., Jillette, N., Malhotra, A., Geurts, A. M., Chen, Y., & Wang, H. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.176594 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Genome modification by CRISPR /Cas9
Ma, Y., Zhang, L., & Huang, X. (2014) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.13110 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
CASFISH: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated in situ labeling of genomic loci in fixed cells
Deng, W., Shi, X., Tjian, R., Lionnet, T., & Singer, R. H. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1515692112 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Immunological properties of gold nanoparticles
Dykman, L. A., & Khlebtsov, N. G. (2016) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c6sc03631g · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PK stimulates Cas9-mediated genome editing
Robert, F., Barbeau, M., Ethier, S. D., Dostie, J., & Pelletier, J. (2015) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0215-6 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Wu, Y., Zhou, H., Fan, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., Xie, Z., Bai, M., Yin, Q., Liang, D., et al. (2015) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2014.160 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Targeting hepatitis B virus cccDNA by CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease efficiently inhibits viral replication
Dong, C., Qu, L., Wang, H., Wei, L., Dong, Y., & Xiong, S. (2015) · Antiviral Research · doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.03.015 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Gene Insertion Into Genomic Safe Harbors for Human Gene Therapy
Papapetrou, E. P., & Schambach, A. (2016) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2016.38 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Kogure, K., Moriguchi, R., Sasaki, K., Ueno, M., Futaki, S., & Harashima, H. (2004) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.04.024 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Zhen, S. M., Hua, L., Liu, Y.-H., Gao, L.-C., Fu, J., Wan, D.-Y., Dong, L.-H., Song, H.-F., & Gao, X. (2015) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/gt.2015.2 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Gaspar, H. B., Cooray, S., Gilmour, K. C., Parsley, K. L., Adams, S. P., Howe, S. J., Ghonaium, A. A., Xu‐Bayford, J., Brown, L., Davies, E. G., et al. (2011) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002715 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Liu, Y., Zeng, Y., Liu, L., Zhuang, C., Fu, X., Huang, W., & Cai, Z. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6393 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
RNA-guided endonuclease provides a therapeutic strategy to cure latent herpesviridae infection
Wang, J., & Quake, S. R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1410785111 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Li, C., Guan, X., Du, T., Jin, W., Wu, B., Liu, Y., Wang, P., Hu, B., Griffin, G. E., Shattock, R. J., et al. (2015) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/vir.0.000139 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Durfee, P. N., Lin, Y., Dunphy, D. R., Muñiz, A. J., Butler, K. S., Humphrey, K. R., Lokke, A. J., Agola, J. O., Chou, S. S., Chen, I., et al. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b02819 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
A CRISPR-Based Screen Identifies Genes Essential for West-Nile-Virus-Induced Cell Death
Ma, H., Dang, Y., Wu, Y., Jia, G., Anaya, E., Zhang, J., Abraham, S., Choi, J.-G., Shi, G., Qi, L., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.049 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Su, J., Sun, H., Meng, Q., Zhang, P., Yin, Q., & Li, Y. (2017) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.17259 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Adeno-associated virus vector integration.
Deyle, D. R., & Russell, D. W. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Structural Plasticity of PAM Recognition by Engineered Variants of the RNA-Guided Endonuclease Cas9
Anders, C., Bargsten, K., & Jinek, M. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.020 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Adenoviral Vector Immunity: Its Implications and Circumvention Strategies
Ahi, Y. S., Bangari, D. S., & Mittal, S. K. (2011) · Current Gene Therapy · doi:10.2174/156652311796150372 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
TALENs facilitate targeted genome editing in human cells with high specificity and low cytotoxicity
Mussolino, C., Alzubi, J., Fine, E. J., Morbitzer, R., Cradick, T. J., Lahaye, T., Bao, G., & Cathomen, T. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku305 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Horii, T., Arai, Y., Yamazaki, M., Morita, S., Kimura, M., Itoh, M., Abe, Y., & Hatada, I. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04513 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
A mouse model for adult cardiac-specific gene deletion with CRISPR/Cas9
Carroll, K. J., Makarewich, C. A., McAnally, J., Anderson, D. M., Zentilin, L., Liu, N., Giacca, M., Bassel‐Duby, R., & Olson, E. N. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1523918113 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
RNA-dependent RNA targeting by CRISPR-Cas9
Strutt, S. C., Torrez, R. M., Kaya, E., Negrete, O. A., & Doudna, J. A. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.32724 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Gene silencing as a threat to the success of gene therapy
Bestor, T. H. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci9459 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Carbon nanotubes as vectors for gene therapy: Past achievements, present challenges and future goals
Bates, K., & Kostarelos, K. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2013.10.003 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Guan, Y., Ma, Y., Li, Q., Sun, Z., Ma, L., Wu, L., Wang, L., Zeng, L., Shao, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2016) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201506039 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Cells with Red-Light Photoactivated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles
Mackowiak, S. A., Schmidt, A., Weiß, V., Argyo, C., von Schirnding, C., Bein, T., & Bräuchle, C. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl400681f · Cited by 175 · see citing works
(2002) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/10430340152712629 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Luo, G., Chen, W., Liu, Y., Lei, Q., Zhuo, R., & Zhang, X. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06064 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Structural basis for the altered PAM specificities of engineered CRISPR-cas9
Hirano, S., Nishimasu, H., Ishitani, R., & Nureki, O. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.018 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Sierig, G., Cywes‐Bentley, C., Wessels, M. R., & Ashbaugh, C. D. (2002) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.71.1.446-455.2003 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Engineered Viruses as Genome Editing Devices
Chen, X., & Gonçalves, M. A. F. V. (2015) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2015.164 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Seeking the Cause of Induced Leukemias in X-SCID Trial
Kaiser, J. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.299.5606.495 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Inhibition of HSV-1 Replication by Gene Editing Strategy
Roehm, P. C., Shekarabi, M., Wollebo, H. S., Bellizzi, A., He, L., Salkind, J., & Khalili, K. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep23146 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Delivery and therapeutic applications of gene editing technologies ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9
LaFountaine, J. S., Fathe, K., & Smyth, H. D. C. (2015) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.029 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Structural impact of hydrodynamic injection on mouse liver
Suda, T., Gao, X., Stolz, D. B., & Liu, D. (2006) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3302865 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Radecke, S. M., Radecke, F., Cathomen, T., & Schwarz, K. (2010) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2009.304 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
AAV-mediated CRISPR/cas gene editing of retinal cells in vivo
Hung, S. S. C., Chrysostomou, V., Li, F., Lim, J. K. H., Wang, J.-H., Powell, J. E., Tu, L., Daniszewski, M., Lo, C., Wong, R. C., et al. (2016) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19316 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Hydrodynamic Gene Delivery and Its Applications in Pharmaceutical Research
Bonamassa, B., Hai, L., & Liu, D. (2010) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0338-9 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
DNA-binding-domain fusions enhance the targeting range and precision of Cas9
Bolukbasi, M. F., Gupta, A., Oikemus, S., Derr, A. G., Garber, M. G., Brodsky, M. H., Zhu, L. J., & Wolfe, S. A. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3624 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Efficient gene editing in adult mouse livers via adenoviral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9
Cheng, R., Jin, P. K., Yan, Y., Cao, P., Wang, J., Qiu, C., Tang, L., Liu, D., Tang, L., Jin, J., et al. (2014) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2014.09.008 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 233 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Deyle DR, 2009, Curr Opin Mol Ther, 11, 442
- Garrett RA, 2015, Life (Basel, Switzerland), 5, 783
- Tomkinson AE, 2013, Translational Cancer Res, 2, 1219
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review
Raza, A., Razzaq, A., Mehmood, S. S., Zou, X., Zhang, X., Lv, Y., & Xu, J. (2019) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants8020034 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
“CRISPR/Cas9 is a modern genome editing strategy based on the prokaryotic defense mechanism triggered by type II RNA organization that offers pr tection to prokaryotes against attacking viruses [146,235,236].”
BackgroundCRISPR technology: A decade of genome editing is only the beginning
Wang, J. Y., & Doudna, J. A. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add8643 · Cited by 1,058 · see citing works
mRNA-based therapeutics: powerful and versatile tools to combat diseases
Qin, S., Tang, X., Chen, Y., Chen, K., Fan, N., Xiao, W., Zheng, Q., Li, G., Teng, Y., Wu, M., et al. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01007-w · Cited by 801 · see citing works
CRISPR Gene Therapy: Applications, Limitations, and Implications for the Future
Uddin, F. Z., Rudin, C. M., & Sen, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01387 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas9 DNA Base-Editing and Prime-Editing
Kantor, A., McClements, M. E., & MacLaren, R. E. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21176240 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Current applications and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in cancer
Wang, S.-W., Gao, C., Zheng, Y.-M., Yi, L., Lu, J.-C., Huang, X.-Y., Cai, J.-B., Zhang, P.-F., Cui, Y.-H., & Ke, A.-W. (2022) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-022-01518-8 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Latest Developed Strategies to Minimize the Off-Target Effects in CRISPR-Cas-Mediated Genome Editing
Naeem, M., Majeed, S., Hoque, M. Z., & Ahmad, I. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071608 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Mechanism and Applications of CRISPR/Cas-9-Mediated Genome Editing
Mengstie, M. A., & Wondimu, B. Z. (2021) · Biologics · doi:10.2147/btt.s326422 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing
Xue, C., & Greene, E. C. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Polymeric Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids
Kumar, R., Chalarca, C. F. S., Bockman, M. R., Bruggen, C. V., Grimme, C. J., Dalal, R. J., Hanson, M. G., Hexum, J. K., & Reineke, T. M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00997 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Karvelis, T., Bigelyte, G., Young, J. K., Hou, Z., Žedaveinytė, R., Budre, K., Paulraj, S., Djukanovic, V., Gasior, S. L., Šilanskas, A., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa208 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing
Gupta, D., Bhattacharjee, O., Mandal, D., Sen, M. K., Dey, D., Dasgupta, A., Kazi, T. A., Gupta, R. K., Sinharoy, S., Acharya, K., et al. (2019) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116636 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy
Abou-el-Enein, M., Elsallab, M., Feldman, S. A., Fesnak, A. D., Heslop, H. E., Marks, P., Till, B. G., Bauer, G., & Savoldo, B. (2021) · Blood Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0084 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Recent Advances in CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Strategies
Yip, B. H. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10060839 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas9: A Preclinical and Clinical Perspective for the Treatment of Human Diseases
Sharma, G., Sharma, A. R., Bhattacharya, M., Lee, S., & Chakraborty, C. (2020) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.09.028 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
The genome editing revolution: review
Khalil, A. M. (2020) · Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s43141-020-00078-y · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Viral Delivery Systems for CRISPR
Xu, C. L., Ruan, M. Z. C., Mahajan, V. B., & Tsang, S. H. (2019) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v11010028 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Delivery of CRISPR-Cas tools for in vivo genome editing therapy: Trends and challenges
Taha, E. A., Lee, J., & Hotta, A. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.013 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Chehelgerdi, M., Chehelgerdi, M., Khorramian-Ghahfarokhi, M., Shafieizadeh, M., Mahmoudi, E., Eskandari, F., Rashidi, M., Arshi, A., & Mokhtari-Farsani, A. (2024) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01925-5 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Chondrocyte-specific genomic editing enabled by hybrid exosomes for osteoarthritis treatment
Liang, Y., Xu, X., Xu, L., Iqbal, Z., Ouyang, K., Zhang, H., Wen, C., Duan, L., & Xia, J. (2022) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.69368 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in Crop Quality Improvement
Liu, Q., Yang, F., Zhang, J., Liu, H., Rahman, S., Islam, S., Ma, W., & She, M. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22084206 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Recent advances in the CRISPR genome editing tool set
Moon, S. B., Kim, D. Y., Ko, J., & Kim, Y.-S. (2019) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-019-0339-7 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Various Aspects of a Gene Editing System—CRISPR–Cas9
Janik, E., Niemcewicz, M., Ceremuga, M., Krzowski, Ł., Saluk, J., & Bijak, M. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21249604 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Prime editing: advances and therapeutic applications
Zhao, Z., Shang, P., Mohanraju, P., & Geijsen, N. (2023) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.03.004 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
CRISPR Cpf1 proteins: structure, function and implications for genome editing
Safari, F., Zare, K., Negahdaripour, M., Barekati‐Mowahed, M., & Ghasemi, Y. (2019) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-019-0298-7 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas Tools and Their Application in Genetic Engineering of Human Stem Cells and Organoids
Hendriks, D. F. G., Clevers, H. C., & Artegiani, B. (2020) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.014 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Gene editing and CRISPR in the clinic: current and future perspectives
Hirakawa, M. P., Krishnakumar, R., Timlin, J. A., Carney, J. P., & Butler, K. S. (2020) · Bioscience Reports · doi:10.1042/bsr20200127 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationA review of emerging physical transfection methods for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing
Fajrial, A. K., He, Q., Wirusanti, N. I., Slansky, J. E., & Ding, X. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.43465 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Where Do We Stand in 2023?
Lundstrom, K. H. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15030698 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Rational designs of in vivo CRISPR-Cas delivery systems
Xu, C., Chen, G., Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, G., Lu, Z.-D., Czarna, A., Gu, Z., & Wang, J. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.11.005 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Nucleic acid drugs: recent progress and future perspectives
Sun, X., Setrerrahmane, S., Li, C., Hu, J., & Xu, H. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02035-4 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Advances in CRISPR therapeutics
Chavez, M., Chen, X., Finn, P. B., & Qi, L. S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-022-00636-2 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Lung and liver editing by lipid nanoparticle delivery of a stable CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein
Chen, K., Han, H., Zhao, S., Xu, B., Yin, B., Lawanprasert, A., Trinidad, M. I., Burgstone, B. W., Murthy, N., & Doudna, J. A. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02437-3 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
A catalogue of biochemically diverse CRISPR-Cas9 orthologs
Gasiūnas, G., Young, J. K., Karvelis, T., Kazlauskas, D., Urbaitis, T., Jasnauskaitė, M., Grusyte, M. M., Paulraj, S., Wang, P.-H., Hou, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19344-1 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Applications and challenges of CRISPR-Cas gene-editing to disease treatment in clinics
Liu, W., Li, L., Jiang, J., Wu, M., & Lin, P. (2021) · Precision Clinical Medicine · doi:10.1093/pcmedi/pbab014 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Sandweiss, A. J., Brandt, V. L., & Zoghbi, H. Y. (2020) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30217-9 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Rasul, M. F., Hussen, B. M., Salihi, A. B., Ismael, B. S., Jalal, P. J., Zanichelli, A., Jamali, E., Baniahmad, A., Ghafouri‐Fard, S., Basiri, A., et al. (2022) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-021-01487-4 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Targeted homology-directed repair in blood stem and progenitor cells with CRISPR nanoformulations
Shahbazi, R., Sghia-Hughes, G., Reid, J. L., Kubek, S., Haworth, K. G., Humbert, O., Kiem, H., & Adair, J. E. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0385-5 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas for genome editing: Classification, mechanism, designing and applications
Bhatia, S. K., ., P., & Yadav, S. K. (2023) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124054 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Aljabali, A. A. A., El‐Tanani, M., & Tambuwala, M. M. (2024) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105338 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
The application of the CRISPR-Cas system in antibiotic resistance
Tao, S., Chen, H., Li, N., & Liang, W. (2022) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s370869 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococcus and Staphylococcus aureus
Li, G., Walker, M. J., & Oliveira, D. M. P. D. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11010024 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Recent advances and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 in cancer immunotherapy
Liu, Z., Shi, M., Ren, Y., Xu, H., Weng, S., Ning, W., Ge, X., Liu, L., Guo, C., Duo, M., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01738-6 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Strategies for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease: Beyond Dopamine
Iarkov, A., Barreto, G. E., Grizzell, J. A., & Echeverrı́a, V. (2020) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2020.00004 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Viral Vectors for the in Vivo Delivery of CRISPR Components: Advances and Challenges
Mengstie, M. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.895713 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Construct design for CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in plants
Hassan, M. M., Zhang, Y., Yuan, G., De, K., Chen, J., Muchero, W., Tuskan, G. A., Qi, Y., & Yang, X. (2021) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.06.015 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Hamilton, P. J., & Nestler, E. J. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.05.005 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Wei, T., Cheng, Q., Farbiak, L., Anderson, D. G., Langer, R., & Siegwart, D. J. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c04707 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
An Outlook on Global Regulatory Landscape for Genome-Edited Crops
Ahmad, A., Munawar, N., Khan, Z., Qumsani, A. T., Khan, S. H., Jamil, A., Ashraf, S., Ghouri, M. Z., Aslam, S., Mubarik, M. S., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222111753 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: a new approach for overcoming drug resistance in cancer
Vaghari‐Tabari, M., Hassanpour, P., Sadeghsoltani, F., Malakoti, F., Alemi, F., Qujeq, D., Asemi, Z., & Yousefi, B. (2022) · Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters · doi:10.1186/s11658-022-00348-2 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Dengue Detection: Advances in Diagnostic Tools from Conventional Technology to Point of Care
Kabir, M. A., Zilouchian, H., Younas, M. A., & Asghar, W. (2021) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios11070206 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Khoshandam, M., Soltaninejad, H., Mousazadeh, M., Hamidieh, A. A., & Hosseinkhani, S. (2023) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2023.02.027 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated genome editing: From basic research to translational medicine
Jacinto, F. V., Link, W., & Ferreira, B. I. (2020) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/jcmm.14916 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Lin, W., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Qiu, X., Huang, Q., Wan, F., Le, Z., Geng, S., Zhang, A., Qiu, S., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35710-7 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
In vivo CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of fusion oncogenes for selective elimination of cancer cells
Martínez-Lage, M., Torres-Ruiz, R., Puig-Serra, P., Moreno-Gaona, P., Martín, M. C., Moya, F., Bustamante, O. Q., Garcı́a-Silva, S., Carcaboso, A. M., Petazzi, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18875-x · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Genetic Therapy for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Roh, E., Darai, A., Kyung, J. W., Choi, H., Kwon, S. Y., Bhujel, B., Kim, K., & Han, I. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22041579 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Liu, N., Zhao, J., Du, J., Hou, C., Zhou, X., Chen, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174237 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Macrophage Modification Strategies for Efficient Cell Therapy
Poltavets, A. S., Vishnyakova, P., Elchaninov, A. V., Sukhikh, G. T., & Fatkhudinov, T. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9061535 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Ex vivo cell-based CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for therapeutic applications
Li, Y., Glass, Z., Huang, M., Chen, Z., & Xu, Q. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119711 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Quantitating Endosomal Escape of a Library of Polymers for mRNA Delivery
Jiang, Y., Qiao, L., Wang, Y., Xu, E., Ho, A. S. L., Singh, P., Wang, Y., Jiang, Z., Yang, F., Tietjen, G. T., et al. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04426 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Banakar, R., Eggenberger, A. L., Lee, K., Wright, D. A., Murugan, K., Zarecor, S., Lawrence‐Dill, C. J., Sashital, D. G., & Wang, K. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55681-y · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Jubair, L., Fallaha, S., & McMillan, N. A. J. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.08.012 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Mukai, H., Ogawa, K., Kato, N., & Kawakami, S. (2022) · Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1016/j.dmpk.2022.100450 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Comparison of the Feasibility, Efficiency, and Safety of Genome Editing Technologies
Castro, N. G. G., Bjelic, J., Malhotra, G., Huang, C., & Alsaffar, S. H. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms221910355 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
The miniature CRISPR-Cas12m effector binds DNA to block transcription
Wu, W. Y., Mohanraju, P., Liao, C., Adiego-Pérez, B., Creutzburg, S. C. A., Makarova, K. S., Keessen, K., Lindeboom, T. A., Khan, T. S., Prinsen, S. H. P., et al. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.11.003 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Acharya, S., Mishra, A., Paul, D., Ansari, A. H., Azhar, M., Kumar, M., Rauthan, R., Sharma, N., Aich, M., Sinha, D., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1818461116 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Mashel, T., Tarakanchikova, Y., Muslimov, A., Zyuzin, M., Timin, A., Lepik, K., & Fehse, B. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120282 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Genetic glycoengineering in mammalian cells
Narimatsu, Y., Büll, C., Chen, Y., Wandall, H. H., Yang, Z., & Clausen, H. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100448 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Delivery technologies for T cell gene editing: Applications in cancer immunotherapy
Atsavapranee, E., Billingsley, M. M., & Mitchell, M. J. (2021) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103354 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Challenges in delivery systems for CRISPR-based genome editing and opportunities of nanomedicine
Sioson, V. A., Kim, M., & Joo, J. (2021) · Biomedical Engineering Letters · doi:10.1007/s13534-021-00199-4 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Ready for Repair? Gene Editing Enters the Clinic for the Treatment of Human Disease
Ernst, M. P. T., Broeders, M., Herrero-Hernandez, P., Oussoren, E., van der Ploeg, A. T., & Pijnappel, W. W. M. P. (2020) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2020.06.022 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
An engineered hypercompact CRISPR-Cas12f system with boosted gene-editing activity
Wu, T., Liu, C., Zou, S., Lyu, R., Yang, B., Yan, H., Zhao, M., & Tang, W. (2023) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-023-01380-9 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Green Revolution to Gene Revolution: Technological Advances in Agriculture to Feed the World
Hamdan, M. F., Noor, S. N. M., Abd-Aziz, N., Pua, T., & Tan, B. C. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11101297 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
RNA therapeutics in the clinic
Curreri, A. M., Sankholkar, D., Mitragotri, S., & Zhao, Z. (2022) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10374 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
A Review on Advanced CRISPR-Based Genome-Editing Tools: Base Editing and Prime Editing
Sichani, A. S., Ranjbar, M., Baneshi, M., Zadeh, F. T., & Fallahi, J. (2022) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-022-00639-1 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Uncultured Naive Mouse T Cells for In Vivo Studies
Nüssing, S., House, I. G., Kearney, C. J., Chen, A. X. Y., Vervoort, S. J., Beavis, P. A., Oliaro, J., Johnstone, R. W., Trapani, J. A., & Parish, I. A. (2020) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1901396 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Dua, K., Rapalli, V. K., Shukla, S. D., Singhvi, G., Shastri, M. D., Chellappan, D. K., Satija, S., Mehta, M., Gulati, M., Pinto, T. D. J. A., et al. (2018) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.101 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
CRISPR/Cas systems: Delivery and application in gene therapy
Huang, J., Zhou, Y., Li, J., Lü, A., & Liang, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.942325 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Targeting miRNA by CRISPR/Cas in cancer: advantages and challenges
Hussen, B. M., Rasul, M. F., Abdullah, S. R., Hidayat, H. J., Faraj, G. S. H., Ali, F. A., Salihi, A. B., Baniahmad, A., Ghafouri‐Fard, S., Rahman, M., et al. (2023) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-023-00468-6 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Drug delivery using gold nanoparticles
Dykman, L. A., Khlebtsov, B. N., & Khlebtsov, N. G. (2024) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2024.115481 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Dubrot, J., Lane-Reticker, S. K., Kessler, E., Ayer, A., Mishra, G., Wolfe, C. H., Zimmer, M. D., Du, P. P., Mahapatra, A., Ockerman, K. M., et al. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.01.001 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Biomaterials as vectors for the delivery of CRISPR–Cas9
Eoh, J. H., & Gu, L. (2019) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c8bm01310a · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Phage delivered CRISPR-Cas system to combat multidrug-resistant pathogens in gut microbiome
Nath, A., Bhattacharjee, R., Nandi, A., Sinha, A., Kar, S., Manoharan, N., Mitra, S., Mojumdar, A., Panda, P. K., Patro, S., et al. (2022) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113122 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Adenovirus Vector System: Construction, History and Therapeutic Applications
Syyam, A., Nawaz, A., Ijaz, A., Sajjad, U., Fazil, A., Irfan, S., Muzaffar, A., Shahid, M., Idrees, M., Malik, K. A., et al. (2022) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/btn-2022-0051 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Biomaterials-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery: recent challenges and opportunities in gene therapy
Dubey, A. K., & Mostafavi, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2023.1259435 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Recent updates on innovative approaches to overcome drug resistance for better outcomes in cancer
Sharma, M., Bakshi, A. K., Mittapelly, N., Gautam, S., Marwaha, D., Rai, N., Singh, N., Tiwari, P., Agarwal, N., Kumar, A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.007 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Exosome/Liposome-like Nanoparticles: New Carriers for CRISPR Genome Editing in Plants
Alghuthaymi, M. A., Ahmad, A., Khan, Z., Khan, S. H., Ahmed, F. K., Faiz, S., Nepovimova, E., Kuča, K., & Abd-Elsalam, K. A. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22147456 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“By coating the nanoclew with polymer polyethylenimine (PEI) to induce endosomal escape, the group demonstrated roughly 36% efficiency in the delivery of CRISPR/Cas9:RNP with the nanoclew (compared with 5% with bare Cas9:sgRNA and PEI).”
BackgroundInfluentialRecent advances in the delivery and applications of nonviral CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
Sinclair, F., Begum, A. A., Dai, C. C., Tóth, I., & Moyle, P. M. (2023) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-023-01320-z · Cited by 88 · see citing works
RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases
Zhao, W., Hou, X., Vick, O. G., & Dong, Y. (2019) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119291 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Harnessing nanoparticles for the efficient delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Rahimi, H., Salehiabar, M., Charmi, J., Barsbay, M., Ghaffarlou, M., Razlighi, M. R., Davaran, S., Khalilov, R. I., Sugiyama, M., Nosrati, H., et al. (2020) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100895 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Recent advances in liposome formulations for breast cancer therapeutics
Yang, B., Song, B.-P., Shankar, S., Guller, A., & Deng, W. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03850-6 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Engineering approaches for RNA-based and cell-based osteoarthritis therapies
DeJulius, C. R., Walton, B. L., Colazo, J. M., d’Arcy, R., Francini, N., Brunger, J. M., & Duvall, C. L. (2024) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-023-01067-4 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Qiao, J., Sun, W., Lin, S., Jin, R., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c9cc00010k · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Microgels: From Biomolecules to Functionality
Xu, Y., Zhu, H., Denduluri, A. J., Ou, Y., Erkamp, N. A., Qi, R., Shen, Y., & Knowles, T. P. J. (2022) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202200180 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Drug delivery challenges and formulation aspects of proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTACs)
Saraswat, A. L., Vartak, R., Hegazy, R. R., Patel, A., & Patel, K. R. (2022) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2022.103387 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Disease mechanisms and gene therapy for Usher syndrome
Géléoc, G. S. G., & El-Amraoui, A. (2020) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2020.107932 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Silicon‐Nanotube‐Mediated Intracellular Delivery Enables Ex Vivo Gene Editing
Chen, Y., Aslanoglou, S., Murayama, T., Gervinskas, G., FitzGerald, L. I., Sriram, S., Tian, J. M., Johnston, A. P. R., Morikawa, Y., Suu, K., et al. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202000036 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Current approaches in CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene editing for biomedical and therapeutic applications
Bhattacharjee, G., Gohil, N., Khambhati, K., Mani, I., Maurya, R., Karapurkar, J. K., Gohil, J., Chu, D., Vu‐Thi, H., Alzahrani, K. J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.02.005 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Evolution of plant mutagenesis tools: a shifting paradigm from random to targeted genome editing
Shelake, R. M., Pramanik, D., & Kim, J. (2019) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-019-00562-z · Cited by 77 · see citing works
CRISPR/Cas-Based Modifications for Therapeutic Applications: A Review
Bharathkumar, N., Abraham, S., Meera, P., Aksah, S., Muthu, K., Saravanan, K. M., & Anand, T. (2021) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-021-00422-8 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lino, C. A., Harper, J. C., Carney, J. P., & Timlin, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Sandia National Laboratories (US)
- Corresponding author
- Timlin, Jerilyn A.
- ORCID
- Timlin, Jerilyn A.
- Venue
- Drug Delivery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1234-1257
- ISSN
- 1071-7544 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0464
- PMC
- PMC6058482
- OpenAlex
- W2804566227
- Semantic Scholar
- 4323701c82b00327c9d78ad5bf360877de31d0dd
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 233
- Citations by year
- 2026: 101 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 183 · 2021: 177 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 10 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Drug Delivery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Sandia National Laboratories
- US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (DE-NA0003525)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, gene therapy, genome editing, CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, adeno-associated virus vectors, adenoviral vector, lentiviral vectors, liposomes, polyplexes, gold nanoparticles, electroporation, microinjection, zinc finger nucleases, TALEN, in vivo gene therapy
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Animals, Humans, Genetic Therapy, Gene Transfer Techniques, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review