Cited by 159DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Biological Computing

Nucleobase Pairing in Expanded Watson-Crick-like Genetic Information Systems

Open access
Geyer, C.Ronald, Battersby, Thomas R., Benner, Steven A.·2003·Structure

Abstract

To guide the design of alternative genetic systems, we measured melting temperatures of DNA duplexes containing matched and mismatched nucleobase pairs from natural and unnatural structures. The pairs were analyzed in terms of structural features, including nucleobase size, number of hydrogen bonds formed, the presence of uncompensated hydrogen bonding functional groups, the nature of the bond joining the nucleobase to the sugar, and nucleobase charge. The results suggest that stability of nucleobase pairs correlates with the number of H-bonds, size complementarity, the presence of uncompensated functional groups, and the presence of charge on a nucleobase. Each of these properties appear to be more significant than the nature of the glycosidic bond and sequence context. The results provide guidelines for constructing stable Watson-Crick like nucleobase pairs with unnatural nucleobases. The experiments also demonstrate that expanded genetic systems can be constructed using size complementary nucleobase pairs that contain three hydrogen bonds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2003.11.008

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another alternative genetic system could also have a genetic polymer with different bases than the four used on Earth or with a different chemical backbone.

    “Another alternative genetic system could also have a genetic polymer (i.e., DNA-like molecule) with different bases than the four used on Earth or with a different chemical backbone (Geyer et al., 2003; Benner et al., 2004).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Geyer et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geyer, C. R., Battersby, T. R., & Benner, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Geyer, C.Ronald
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
1485-1498
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054436276
Cited by
159
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-54048, R01GM054048)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
Keywords
nucleobase pairing, unnatural nucleobases, Watson-Crick base pairing, mismatched base pairs, hydrogen bonding, glycosidic linkage
MeSH terms
DNA, Hydrogen Bonding, Information Systems, Models, Chemical, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Conformation, Purines, Pyrimidines, Temperature, Thermodynamics, Base Pairing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review