Cited by 98Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

On the origin of the canonical nucleobases: an assessment of selection pressures across chemical and early biological evolution

Open access
Rios, Andro C., Tor, Yitzhak·2013·Israel Journal of Chemistry

Abstract

The native bases of RNA and DNA are prominent examples of the narrow selection of organic molecules upon which life is based. How did nature “decide” upon these specific heterocycles? Evidence suggests that many types of heterocycles could have been present on the early Earth. It is therefore likely that the contemporary composition of nucleobases is a result of multiple selection pressures that operated during early chemical and biological evolution. The persistence of the fittest heterocycles in the prebiotic environment towards, for example, hydrolytic and photochemical assaults, may have given some nucleobases a selective advantage for incorporation into the first informational polymers. The prebiotic formation of polymeric nucleic acids employing the native bases remains, however, a challenging problem to reconcile. Hypotheses have proposed that the emerging RNA world may have included many types of nucleobases. This is supported by the extensive utilization of non‐canonical nucleobases in extant RNA and the resemblance of many of the modified bases to heterocycles generated in simulated prebiotic chemistry experiments. Selection pressures in the RNA world could have therefore narrowed the composition of the nucleic acid bases. Two such selection pressures may have been related to genetic fidelity and duplex stability. Considering these possible selection criteria, the native bases along with other related heterocycles seem to exhibit a certain level of fitness. We end by discussing the strength of the N‐glycosidic bond as a potential fitness parameter in the early DNA world, which may have played a part in the refinement of the alphabetic bases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijch.201300009

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The four canonical RNA bases were proposed as a more stable replacement for an earlier more irregular set.

    “with the four canonical RNA bases proposed as a more stable replacement for an earlier more irregular set [39].”

    From The RNA world as a model system to study the origin of life (2015) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [6]a) Rae PMM Steele RE Biosystems 1978 10 37 b) Gommers-Ampt J Borst P FASEB J 1995 9 1034 7649402
  2. [8]Rich A Horizons in Biochemistry Kasha M Pullman B Academic Press New York 1962 103
  3. [15]a) Botta O Bada JL Surv Geophys 2002 23 411 b) Callahan MP Smith KE Cleaves HJ Ruzicka J Stern JC Glavin DP House CH Dworkin JP Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011 108 13995 21836052 PMC3161613
  4. [42]a) Cleaves HJ II Bada J Genesis – In The Beginning 22 Seckbach J Springer Netherlands 2012 3 b) Engelhart AE Hud NV Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 2010 2 a002196 PMC2982173 20462999
  5. [49]Benner SA Burgstaller P Battersby TR Jurczyk S The RNA World 2 Gesteland RF Cech TR Atkins JF Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor 1999 163

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rios, A. C., & Tor, Y.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Tor, Yitzhak
Venue
Israel Journal of Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-17
Volume
53
Issue
6-7
Pages
469-483
ISSN
  • 0021-2148 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-5868
OpenAlex
W1993449464
Cited by
98
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Israel Journal of Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM069773)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
prebiotic chemistry, selection pressure, RNA world, heterocyclic compounds, genetic fidelity, duplex stability, N-glycosidic bond, origin of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review