Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Architecture of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with Postfusion Spikes Revealed by Cryo-EM and Cryo-ET

Open access
Liu, Chuang, Mendonça, Luiza, Yang, Yang, Gao, Yuanzhu, Shen, Chenguang, Liu, Jiwei, Ni, Tao, Ju, Bin, Liu, Congcong, Tang, Xian, Wei, Jinli, Ma, Xiaomin, Zhu, Yanan, Liu, Weilong, Xu, Shuman, Liu, Yingxia, Yuan, Jing, Wu, Jing, Liu, Zheng, Zhang, Zheng, Liu, Lei, Wang, Peiyi, Zhang, Peijun·2020·Structure

Abstract

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in December 2019, led to the ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19), which has claimed more than a half million lives in a few months. Enormous efforts are being made in developing vaccines and therapeutic treatment to fight against COVID-19. Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 viruses are currently used as vaccine candidates; therefore, it is important to understand the architecture of SARS-CoV-2. We have propagated and purified a clinical strain of SARS-CoV-2 and genetically and structurally characterized β-propiolactone inactivated viruses. We observed that the virus particles are roughly spherical or moderately pleiomorphic. Although a small fraction of prefusion spikes are observed, the majority of viral spikes appear nail-shaped resembling a postfusion state, where S1 protein of the spike has disassociated. Cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging of these spikes yielded a density map which closely matches the overall structure of SARS-CoV S2 spike and their corresponding glycosylation sites. Our findings have major implications in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine design owing to the critical importance of prefusion immunogens.Funding: This work was supported by the Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality(202002073000002), the National Institutes of Health grant P50AI150481 (P.Z.), the UK Wellcome Trust Investigator Award 206422/Z/17/Z(P.Z.), and the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council grant BB/S003339/1 (P.Z.). Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial or non-financial interests. Ethical Approval: The research received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, China (approval number: 2020-038). The Research Ethics Committee waived the requirement informed consent before the study started because of the urgent need to collect epidemiological and clinical data. We analyzed the data anonymously.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2020.10.001

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Liu, C., Mendonça, L., Yang, Y., Gao, Y., Shen, C., Liu, J., Ni, T., Ju, B., Liu, C., Tang, X., Wei, J., Ma, X., Zhu, Y., Liu, W., Xu, S., Liu, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, J., Liu, Z., Zhang, Z., Liu, L., Wang, P., & Zhang, P.
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
1218-1224.e4
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093184496
Cited by
186
References
6
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Architecture of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with Postfusion Spikes Revealed by Cryo-EM and Cryo-ET. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.str.2020.10.001
The paper
Liu, C., Mendonça, L., Yang, Y., Gao, Y., Shen, C., Liu, J., Ni, T., Ju, B., Liu, C., Tang, X., Wei, J., Ma, X., Zhu, Y., Liu, W., Xu, S., Liu, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, J., Liu, Z., . . . Zhang, P. (2020). The Architecture of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with Postfusion Spikes Revealed by Cryo-EM and Cryo-ET. Structure. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2020.10.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.