CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116Student Assessment and FeedbackEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class

Shen, Bin, Bai, Barry, Xue, Weihe·2020·Studies in Educational Evaluation
DOI 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Chen, 2006, Shi lun zi zhu xue xi zai wo guo da xue ying yu jiao xue zhong de ding wei [A probe into an orientation of autonomous learning to college English teaching in China], Foreign Language World, 3, 32
  2. Guo, 2010, Yan jiu sheng ying yu zi zhu xue xi neng li ji xiang guan ying xiang yin su de yan jiu [A study of postgraduates’ autonomous English learning competence and influential factors], Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 6, 66
  3. Joordens, 2009, PeerScholar: An evidence-based online peer assessment tool supporting critical thinking and clear communication, Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on E-Learning, 236
  4. Lin, 2018, Foreign Language World, 5, 80
  5. Mo, 2007, Tong ban hu ping: Ti gao da xue sheng xie zuo zi zhu xing [Peer review: Increasing student autonomy in writing], Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 30, 35
  6. Wu, 2013, Tong ban hu ping dui zi wo xiao neng gan de ying xiang——Yi xiang ji yu da xue ying yu xie zuo de shi zheng yan jiu [Effects of peer review on self-efficacy: An empirical study of college English writing], Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 6, 68
  7. Xu, 2000, Ying yu xie zuo zhong xue sheng hu gai de jiao xue fang fa chu tan [A probe into peer review as a teaching method in English writing], Foreign Affairs Review, 4, 86
  8. Xu, 2014, Wo guo da xue sheng ying yu zi zhu xue xi neng li xian zhuang yu si kao [the current situation and reflection on Chinese college students’ autonomous English learning abilities], Language and Education, 2, 2
  9. Zhu, 2007, Fei ying yu zhuan ye da xue ben ke sheng ying yu zi zhu xue xi neng li wen juan diao cha yu fen xi [A survey of non-English major college student’s autonomous learning ability], Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences), 27, 175

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–116 of 116

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Jinshan College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Corresponding author
Bai, Barry
ORCID
Venue
Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
64
Pages
100821
ISSN
0191-491X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821
OpenAlex
W2981452895
Cited by
108
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 3
FWCI
33.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-03-01)
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
peer assessment, learner autonomy, English writing instruction, teacher feedback, college English, learner confidence, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review