The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: It's time to randomize
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
Wente, M. N., Veit, J. A., Bassi, C., Dervenis, C., Fingerhut, A., Gouma, D. J., Izbicki, J. R., Neoptolemos, J. P., Padbury, R. T., Sarr, M. G., et al. (2007) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001 · Cited by 2,616
Self-citationDiener, M. K., Seiler, C. M., Rossion, I., Kleeff, J., Glanemann, M., Butturini, G., Tomazic, A., Bruns, C. J., Busch, O. R., Farkas, S., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60237-7 · Cited by 554
Self-citationVenkat, R., Edil, B. H., Schulick, R. D., Lidor, A. O., Makary, M. A., & Wolfgang, C. L. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318251ee09 · Cited by 502
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: New Gold Standard
Smith, C. D., Weber, C. J., & Amerson, J. R. (1999) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/pl00012314 · Cited by 399
Left-sided Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
Kooby, D. A., Gillespie, T., Bentrem, D., Nakeeb, A., Schmidt, M. C., Merchant, N. B., Parikh, A. A., Martin, R. C. G., Scoggins, C. R., Ahmad, S., et al. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318185a990 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Kleeff, J., Korc, M., Apte, M., La Vecchia, C., Johnson, C. D., Biankin, A. V., Neale, R. E., Tempero, M., Tuveson, D. A., Hruban, R. H., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.22 · Cited by 1,982
European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms
The European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316027 · Cited by 1,417
Port site infection in laparoscopic surgery: a review of its management
Sasmal, P. K. (2015) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v3.i10.864 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehrabi, A., Hafezi, M., Arvin, J., Esmaeilzadeh, M., Garoussi, C., Emami, G., Kössler-Ebs, J., Müller-Stich, B. P., Büchler, M. W., Hackert, T., & Diener, M. K.
- Venue
- Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-55
- ISSN
- 0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045574573
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: It's time to randomize. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.081
- The paper
- Mehrabi, A., Hafezi, M., Arvin, J., Esmaeilzadeh, M., Garoussi, C., Emami, G., Kössler-Ebs, J., Müller-Stich, B. P., Büchler, M. W., Hackert, T., & Diener, M. K. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: It's time to randomize. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
