The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The case for recycling: Overview and challenges in the material supply chain for automotive li-ion batteries
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Lithium ion batteries (LIB) continue to gain market share in response to the increasing demand for electric vehicles, consumer electronics, and energy storage. The increased demand for LIB has highlighted potential problems in the supply chain of raw materials needed for their manufacture. Some critical metals used in LIB, namely lithium, cobalt, and graphite are scarce, are not currently mined in large quantities, or are mined in only a few countries whose trade policies could limit availability and impact prices. The environmental and social impacts of mining these materials have also drawn attention as production ramps up to meet the increased demand. Closed-loop systems with recycling at the end-of-life provide a pathway to lower environmental impacts and a source of high value materials that can be used in producing new batteries. Because environmental regulations concerning end-of-life batteries are not fully developed or implemented, most of these batteries currently end up in the landfills, with a very small number of spent batteries sent to the existing recycling facilities. However, with proactive regulations, an increasing supply of spent batteries, and innovations in recycling technologies, end-of-life batteries could supply a significant fraction of the materials needed for manufacturing of new LIB. This paper reviews the current state of the LIB manufacturing supply chain, addresses some issues associated with battery end-of-life, and sheds light on the importance of LIB recycling from the environmental and value chain perspectives. We also discuss the expected benefits of recycling on the global LIB supply chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-ion battery materials: present and future
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 · Cited by 7,389
The development and future of lithium ion batteries
Blomgren, G. E. (2017) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0251701jes · Cited by 1,940
A Critical Review and Analysis on the Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
Lv, W., Wang, Z., Cao, H., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2018) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03811 · Cited by 1,163
Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries
Ordoñez, J., Gago, E. J., & Girard, A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.363 · Cited by 694
Progress in electrolytes for rechargeable Li-based batteries and beyond
Li, Q., Chen, J., Fan, L., Kong, X., & Lu, Y. (2016) · Green Energy & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.gee.2016.04.006 · Cited by 569
Comparative Issues of Cathode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries
Julien, C., Mauger, A., Zaghib, K., & Groult, H. (2014) · Inorganics · doi:10.3390/inorganics2010132 · Cited by 513
The future of automotive lithium-ion battery recycling: Charting a sustainable course
Gaines, L. (2014) · Sustainable Materials and Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2014.10.001 · Cited by 473
By-product metals are technologically essential but have problematic supply
Nassar, N. T., Graedel, T. E., & Harper, E. M. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400180 · Cited by 449
Restoring American Competitiveness
Pisano, G. P., & Shih, W. C. (2009) · Harvard business review · Cited by 430
Current and Prospective Li-Ion Battery Recycling and Recovery Processes
Heelan, J., Gratz, E., Zheng, Z., Wang, Q., Chen, M., Apelian, D., & Wang, Y. (2016) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-016-1994-y · Cited by 297
Cited by
Commercialization of Lithium Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles
Zeng, X., Li, M., Abd El‐Hady, D., Alshitari, W., Al‐Bogami, A. S., Lu, J., & Amine, K. (2019) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201900161 · Cited by 1,542
Opportunities and Challenges for Organic Electrodes in Electrochemical Energy Storage
Poizot, P., Gaubicher, J., Renault, S., Dubois, L., Liang, Y., & Yao, Y. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00482 · Cited by 963
Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries
Xu, C., Dai, Q., Gaines, L., Hu, M., Tukker, A., & Steubing, B. (2020) · Communications Materials · doi:10.1038/s43246-020-00095-x · Cited by 898
Lai, X., Chen, Q., Tang, X., Zhou, Y., Gao, F., Guo, Y., Bhagat, R., & Zheng, Y. (2022) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2022.100169 · Cited by 566
A Perspective on the Sustainability of Cathode Materials used in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Murdock, B. E., Toghill, K. E., & Tapia‐Ruiz, N. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102028 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayyas, A., Steward, D., & Mann, M.
- Venue
- Sustainable Materials and Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- e00087
- ISSN
- 2214-9929 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-9937
- OpenAlex
- W2904085351
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The case for recycling: Overview and challenges in the material supply chain for automotive li-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.susmat.2018.e00087
- The paper
- Mayyas, A., Steward, D., & Mann, M. (2019). The case for recycling: Overview and challenges in the material supply chain for automotive li-ion batteries. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2018.e00087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.