The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries
Open accessAbstract
LiBs pose a very specific threat, given that they contain a high percentage of dangerous heavy metals. From the 4000t of used lithium-ion batteries collected in 2005, 1100t of heavy metals and more than 200t of toxic electrolytes were generated. This is why a lot of attention has been paid to the development of the technology necessary to recover and recycle LiBs in order not only to protect the environment but also to conserve resources. The recovery of major spent cell components is beneficial both in terms of environmental protection and also for the provision of raw materials. The authors of this article carried out a state of the art on the technologies used in the recycling and regeneration of industrial lithium-ion batteries. The main objective of such technologies is to enable the recycling of valuable elements present in the batteries, such as cobalt, nickel and copper, in a way which is both profitable and environmentally friendly. All the technologies used in the manufacture of lithium-ion batteries are constantly changing makes subsequent changes to the research into recycling and recovery technologies necessary. This does not mean merely finding ways to recover the precious metals, but also to recover other materials which may harm the environment, in order to dispose of them appropriately. The discussion of this research clearly reflects that:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Toxicity of lithium to humans and the environment—A literature review
Aral, H., & Vecchio-Sadus, A. (2008) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.02.026 · Cited by 546
Mishra, D., Kim, D.-J., Ralph, D. E., Ahn, J.-G., & Rhee, Y.-H. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.010 · Cited by 413
Zhang, T., He, Y., Wang, F., Ge, L., Zhu, X., & Li, H. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.002 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries in view of lithium recovery: A critical review
Liu, C., Lin, J., Cao, H., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.304 · Cited by 789
Novel approaches for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines: A review
Liu, G., Zhao, Z., & Ghahreman, A. (2019) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.05.005 · Cited by 465
A comprehensive review on the pretreatment process in lithium-ion battery recycling
Kim, S., Bang, J., Yoo, J., Shin, Y., Bae, J., Jeong, J., Kim, K., Dong, P., & Kwon, K. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126329 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Ordoñez, J., Gago, E. J., & Girard, A.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 195-205
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2290880407
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 45.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.363
- The paper
- Ordoñez, J., Gago, E. J., & Girard, A. (2016). Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.