CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 82EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

More or less choice? The influence of choice on task motivation and task engagement

Mozgalina, Anastasia·2015·System
DOI 10.1016/j.system.2015.01.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2015.01.004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mozgalina (2015) found that German learners of Russian did not necessarily engage more fully on language learning tasks when they had chosen them themselves.

    “Other recent research has thrown doubt on the view that more choice is always better - Mozgalina (2015) found that German learners of Russian did not necessarily engage more fully on language learning tasks when they had chosen them themselves.”

    From The motivational dimension of language teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Mozgalina (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mozgalina, A.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Mozgalina, Anastasia
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
49
Pages
120-132
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.system.2015.01.004
OpenAlex
W2004338435
Cited by
82
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
33.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
task selection, task motivation, task engagement, autonomy, self-determination theory, task-based language teaching, second language acquisition, Russian as a foreign language, time on task, student motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review