Nicotine dose–concentration relationship and pregnancy outcomes in rat: Biologic plausibility and implications for future research
Abstract
Cigarette smoke (CS) exposure during pregnancy can lead to profound adverse effects on fetal development. Although CS contains several thousand chemicals, nicotine has been widely used as its surrogate as well as in its own right as a neuroteratogen. The justification for the route and dose of nicotine administration is largely based on inferential data suggesting that nicotine 6 mg/kg/day infused continuously via osmotic mini pumps (OMP) would mimic maternal CS exposure. We provide evidence that 6 mg/kg/day nicotine dose as commonly administered to pregnant rats leads to plasma nicotine concentrations that are 3-10-fold higher than those observed in moderate to heavy smokers and pregnant mothers, respectively. Furthermore, the cumulative daily nicotine dose exceeds by several hundred fold the amount consumed by human heavy smokers. Our study does not support the widely accepted notion that regardless of the nicotine dose, a linear nicotine dose-concentration relationship exists in a steady-state OMP model. We also show that total nicotine clearance increases with advancing pregnancy but no significant change is observed between the 2nd and 3rd trimester. Furthermore, nicotine infusion even at this extremely high dose has little effect on a number of maternal and fetal biologic variables and pregnancy outcome suggesting that CS constituents other than nicotine mediate the fetal growth restriction in infants born to smoking mothers. Our current study has major implications for translational research in developmental toxicology and pharmacotherapy using nicotine replacement treatment as an aid to cessation of cigarette smoking in pregnant mothers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Animal models using nicotine alone do not show a consistent effect on fetal growth at exposures that model typical smokers.
“animal models utilizing nicotine alone do not demonstrate any consistent effect on fetal growth at exposures modeling those in typical smokers.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cnattingius, S. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200410001669187 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Guidelines on nicotine dose selection for in vivo research
Matta, S. G., Balfour, D. J., Benowitz, N. L., Boyd, R. T., Buccafusco, J. J., Caggiula, A. R., Craig, C. R., Collins, A. C., Damaj, M. I., Donny, E. C., et al. (2007) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0441-0 · Cited by 824 · see citing works
Luck, W., Nau, H., Hansen, R., & Steldinger, R. (2017) · Developmental Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1159/000457063 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Blood Volume Changes in Normal Pregnancy
Hytten, F. (1985) · Clinics in Haematology · doi:10.1016/s0308-2261(21)00496-3 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Risks and Benefits of Nicotine to Aid Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy
Dempsey, D. A., & Benowitz, N. L. (2001) · Drug Safety · doi:10.2165/00002018-200124040-00005 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Slotkin, T. A. (2008) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2007.09.002 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
England, L. J., Aagaard, K., Bloch, M., Conway, K., Cosgrove, K., Grana, R., Gould, T. J., Hatsukami, D., Jensen, F., Kandel, D., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.013 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Carmines, E. L., & Rajendran, N. (2008) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn009 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Respiratory control in neonatal rats exposed to prenatal cigarette smoke
Pendlebury, J. D., Wilson, R. J. A., Bano, S., Lumb, K. J., Schneider, J. M., & Hasan, S. U. (2008) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200711-1739oc · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- HUSSEIN, J., FARKAS, S., MACKINNON, Y., ARIANO, R., SITAR, D., & HASAN, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- HASAN, S
- Venue
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 218
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0041-008X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995112691
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Calgary
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
- Keywords
- nicotine, dose-concentration relationship, pregnancy outcomes, cigarette smoke exposure, nicotine clearance, fetal growth restriction, nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation during pregnancy, developmental toxicology, rat model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Corticosterone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Research Design, Smoking, Time Factors, Infusion Pumps, Implantable, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Risk Assessment, Toxicity Tests, Nicotinic Agonists, Maternal Exposure, Fetal Development, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review